Yang Gao, Heping Zhang (2018)
Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory
Similarity:
The Clar number of a fullerene graph with n vertices is bounded above by ⌊n/6⌋ − 2 and this bound has been improved to ⌊n/6⌋ − 3 when n is congruent to 2 modulo 6. We can construct at least one fullerene graph attaining the upper bounds for every even number of vertices n ≥ 20 except n = 22 and n = 30.
Abdollah Alimadadi, Doost Ali Mojdeh, Nader Jafari Rad (2016)
Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory
Similarity:
Let G = (V,E) be a graph. A set S ⊆ V is a dominating set if Uv∈S N[v] = V , where N[v] is the closed neighborhood of v. Let L ⊆ V be a dominating set, and let v be a designated vertex in V (an intruder vertex). Each vertex in L ∩ N[v] can report that v is the location of the intruder, but (at most) one x ∈ L ∩ N[v] can report any w ∈ N[x] as the intruder location or x can indicate that there is no intruder in N[x]. A dominating set L is called a liar’s dominating set if every v ∈ V...
Sergio Bermudo, Juan C. Hernández-Gómez, José M. Sigarreta (2018)
Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory
Similarity:
Let G = (V, E) be a graph; a set S ⊆ V is a total k-dominating set if every vertex v ∈ V has at least k neighbors in S. The total k-domination number γkt(G) is the minimum cardinality among all total k-dominating sets. In this paper we obtain several tight bounds for the total k-domination number of a graph. In particular, we investigate the relationship between the total k-domination number of a graph and the order, the size, the girth, the minimum and maximum degree, the diameter,...
Teresa W. Haynes, Michael A. Henning, Lora S. Hopkins (2004)
Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory
Similarity:
A set S of vertices in a graph G = (V,E) is a total dominating set of G if every vertex of V is adjacent to a vertex in S. The total domination number of G is the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G. The total domination subdivision number of G is the minimum number of edges that must be subdivided (where each edge in G can be subdivided at most once) in order to increase the total domination number. First we establish bounds on the total domination subdivision number...
Allan Bickle (2013)
Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory
Similarity:
A set of vertices of a graph G is a total dominating set if each vertex of G is adjacent to a vertex in the set. The total domination number of a graph Υt (G) is the minimum size of a total dominating set. We provide a short proof of the result that Υt (G) ≤ 2/3n for connected graphs with n ≥ 3 and a short characterization of the extremal graphs.
Hamideh Aram, Sepideh Norouzian, Seyed Mahmoud Sheikholeslami (2013)
Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory
Similarity:
Let k be a positive integer, and let G be a simple graph with vertex set V (G). A k-distance Roman dominating function on G is a labeling f : V (G) → {0, 1, 2} such that for every vertex with label 0, there is a vertex with label 2 at distance at most k from each other. The weight of a k-distance Roman dominating function f is the value w(f) =∑v∈V f(v). The k-distance Roman domination number of a graph G, denoted by γkR (D), equals the minimum weight of a k-distance Roman dominating...
Diana Avella-Alaminos, Magda Dettlaff, Magdalena Lemańska, Rita Zuazua (2015)
Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory
Similarity:
The domination multisubdivision number of a nonempty graph G was defined in [3] as the minimum positive integer k such that there exists an edge which must be subdivided k times to increase the domination number of G. Similarly we define the total domination multisubdivision number msdγt (G) of a graph G and we show that for any connected graph G of order at least two, msdγt (G) ≤ 3. We show that for trees the total domination multisubdi- vision number is equal to the known total domination...
S. Fitzpatrick, B. Hartnell (1998)
Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory
Similarity:
We are interested in dominating sets (of vertices) with the additional property that the vertices in the dominating set can be paired or matched via existing edges in the graph. This could model the situation of guards or police where each has a partner or backup. This paper will focus on those graphs in which the number of matched pairs of a minimum dominating set of this type equals the size of some maximal matching in the graph. In particular, we characterize the leafless graphs of...
Hansberg, Adriana, Meierling, Dirk, Volkmann, Lutz (2007)
The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics [electronic only]
Similarity:
Włodzimierz Ulatowski (2009)
Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory
Similarity:
In this paper we show upper bounds for the sum and the product of the lower domination parameters and the chromatic index of a graph. We also present some families of graphs for which these upper bounds are achieved. Next, we give a lower bound for the sum of the upper domination parameters and the chromatic index. This lower bound is a function of the number of vertices of a graph and a new graph parameter which is defined here. In this case we also characterize graphs for which a respective...
Vladimir Samodivkin (2008)
Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory
Similarity:
The domination number γ(G) of a graph G is the minimum number of vertices in a set D such that every vertex of the graph is either in D or is adjacent to a member of D. Any dominating set D of a graph G with |D| = γ(G) is called a γ-set of G. A vertex x of a graph G is called: (i) γ-good if x belongs to some γ-set and (ii) γ-bad if x belongs to no γ-set. The bondage number b(G) of a nonempty graph G is the cardinality of a smallest set of edges whose removal from G results in a graph...
Wyatt J. Desormeaux, Teresa W. Haynes, Michael A. Henning (2018)
Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory
Similarity:
A dominating set in a graph G is a set S of vertices such that every vertex in V (G) S is adjacent to at least one vertex in S, and the domination number of G is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set of G. Placing constraints on a dominating set yields different domination parameters, including total, connected, restrained, and clique domination numbers. In this paper, we study relationships among domination parameters of a graph and its complement.
Anders Sune Pedersen (2005)
Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory
Similarity:
The domination number γ(G) of a graph G is the minimum cardinality of a subset D of V(G) with the property that each vertex of V(G)-D is adjacent to at least one vertex of D. For a graph G with n vertices we define ε(G) to be the number of leaves in G minus the number of stems in G, and we define the leaf density ζ(G) to equal ε(G)/n. We prove that for any graph G with no isolated vertex, γ(G) ≤ n(1- ζ(G))/2 and we characterize the extremal graphs for this bound. Similar results are...
Joanna Raczek (2011)
Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory
Similarity:
Let G = (V,E) be a graph. The distance between two vertices u and v in a connected graph G is the length of the shortest (u-v) path in G. A set D ⊆ V(G) is a dominating set if every vertex of G is at distance at most 1 from an element of D. The domination number of G is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set of G. A set D ⊆ V(G) is a 2-distance dominating set if every vertex of G is at distance at most 2 from an element of D. The 2-distance domination number of G is the minimum...
Sanming Zhou (2004)
Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory
Similarity:
We prove the following Gallai-type equality γₜ(G) + εₜ(G) = p for any graph G with no isolated vertex, where p is the number of vertices of G, γₜ(G) is the total domination number of G, and εₜ(G) is the maximum integer s such that there exists a spanning forest F with s the number of pendant edges of F minus the number of star components of F.
DeLaViña, Ermelinda, Waller, Bill (2008)
The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics [electronic only]
Similarity:
Majid Hajian, Nader Jafari Rad (2017)
Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory
Similarity:
A Roman dominating function (or just RDF) on a graph G = (V,E) is a function f : V → {0, 1, 2} satisfying the condition that every vertex u for which f(u) = 0 is adjacent to at least one vertex v for which f(v) = 2. The weight of an RDF f is the value f(V (G)) = Pu2V (G) f(u). The Roman domination number of a graph G, denoted by R(G), is the minimum weight of a Roman dominating function on G. A graph G is Roman domination stable if the Roman domination number of G remains unchanged under...
A.P. Santhakumaran, P. Titus (2012)
Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory
Similarity:
For a connected graph G of order p ≥ 2 and a vertex x of G, a set S ⊆ V(G) is an x-monophonic set of G if each vertex v ∈ V(G) lies on an x -y monophonic path for some element y in S. The minimum cardinality of an x-monophonic set of G is defined as the x-monophonic number of G, denoted by mₓ(G). An x-monophonic set of cardinality mₓ(G) is called a mₓ-set of G. We determine bounds for it and characterize graphs which realize these bounds. A connected graph of order p with vertex monophonic...
Maria Kwaśnik, Maciej Zwierzchowski (2001)
Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory
Similarity:
This paper contains a number of estimations of the split domination number and the maximal domination number of a graph with a deleted subset of edges which induces a complete subgraph Kₚ. We discuss noncomplete graphs having or not having hanging vertices. In particular, for p = 2 the edge deleted graphs are considered. The motivation of these problems comes from [2] and [6], where the authors, among other things, gave the lower and upper bounds on irredundance, independence and domination...
Richard Brewster, Christina Mynhardt, Laura Teshima (2013)
Open Mathematics
Similarity:
A dominating broadcast on a graph G = (V, E) is a function f: V → {0, 1, ..., diam G} such that f(v) ≤ e(v) (the eccentricity of v) for all v ∈ V and such that each vertex is within distance f(v) from a vertex v with f(v) > 0. The cost of a broadcast f is σ(f) = Σv∈V f(v), and the broadcast number λ b (G) is the minimum cost of a dominating broadcast. A set X ⊆ V(G) is said to be irredundant if each x ∈ X dominates a vertex y that is not dominated by any other vertex in X; possibly...