Spanning trees with leaves bounded by independence number.
Sun, Ling-li (2007)
Applied Mathematics E-Notes [electronic only]
Similarity:
Sun, Ling-li (2007)
Applied Mathematics E-Notes [electronic only]
Similarity:
Kyohei Kozawa, Yota Otachi (2011)
Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory
Similarity:
Let G be a connected graph and T be a spanning tree of G. For e ∈ E(T), the congestion of e is the number of edges in G joining the two components of T - e. The congestion of T is the maximum congestion over all edges in T. The spanning tree congestion of G is the minimum congestion over all its spanning trees. In this paper, we determine the spanning tree congestion of the rook's graph Kₘ ☐ Kₙ for any m and n.
Hajime Matsumura (2015)
Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory
Similarity:
A k-tree is a tree with maximum degree at most k. In this paper, we give a degree sum condition for a graph to have a spanning k-tree in which specified vertices have degree less than k. We denote by σk(G) the minimum value of the degree sum of k independent vertices in a graph G. Let k ≥ 3 and s ≥ 0 be integers, and suppose G is a connected graph and σk(G) ≥ |V (G)|+s−1. Then for any s specified vertices, G contains a spanning k-tree in which every specified vertex has degree less than...
Masayoshi Matsushita, Yota Otachi, Toru Araki (2015)
Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory
Similarity:
Two spanning trees T1 and T2 of a graph G are completely independent if, for any two vertices u and v, the paths from u to v in T1 and T2 are internally disjoint. For a graph G, we denote the maximum number of pairwise completely independent spanning trees by cist(G). In this paper, we consider cist(G) when G is a partial k-tree. First we show that [k/2] ≤ cist(G) ≤ k − 1 for any k-tree G. Then we show that for any p ∈ {[k/2], . . . , k − 1}, there exist infinitely many k-trees G such...
Norbert Polat (1991)
Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal
Similarity:
Michael Poschen, Lutz Volkmann (2006)
Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory
Similarity:
Let ir(G) and γ(G) be the irredundance number and domination number of a graph G, respectively. The number of vertices and leaves of a graph G are denoted by n(G) and n₁(G). If T is a tree, then Lemańska [4] presented in 2004 the sharp lower bound γ(T) ≥ (n(T) + 2 - n₁(T))/3. In this paper we prove ir(T) ≥ (n(T) + 2 - n₁(T))/3. for an arbitrary tree T. Since γ(T) ≥ ir(T) is always valid, this inequality is an extension and improvement of...
Mirko Vujošević, Milan Stanojević (2003)
The Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research
Similarity:
Damir Vukičević (2009)
Kragujevac Journal of Mathematics
Similarity:
Zsakó, László (2006)
Annales Mathematicae et Informaticae
Similarity:
You Lu, Xinmin Hou, Jun-Ming Xu, Ning Li (2010)
Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory
Similarity:
Let γₜ(G) and γ₂(G) be the total domination number and the 2-domination number of a graph G, respectively. It has been shown that: γₜ(T) ≤ γ₂(T) for any tree T. In this paper, we provide a constructive characterization of those trees with equal total domination number and 2-domination number.
Pop, Petrică Claudiu (2005)
Acta Universitatis Apulensis. Mathematics - Informatics
Similarity: