The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

Displaying similar documents to “Two versions of Nakayama lemma for multiplication modules.”

On Matlis dualizing modules.

Enochs, Edgar E., López-Ramos, J.A., Torrecillas, B. (2002)

International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences

Similarity:

Rad-supplemented modules

Engin Büyükaşik, Engin Mermut, Salahattin Özdemir (2010)

Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova

Similarity:

Comultiplication modules over a pullback of Dedekind domains

Reza Ebrahimi Atani, Shahabaddin Ebrahimi Atani (2009)

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal

Similarity:

First, we give complete description of the comultiplication modules over a Dedekind domain. Second, if R is the pullback of two local Dedekind domains, then we classify all indecomposable comultiplication R -modules and establish a connection between the comultiplication modules and the pure-injective modules over such domains.