The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

Displaying 41 – 60 of 208

Showing per page

Reflecting Lindelöf and converging ω₁-sequences

Alan Dow, Klaas Pieter Hart (2014)

Fundamenta Mathematicae

We deal with a conjectured dichotomy for compact Hausdorff spaces: each such space contains a non-trivial converging ω-sequence or a non-trivial converging ω₁-sequence. We establish that this dichotomy holds in a variety of models; these include the Cohen models, the random real models and any model obtained from a model of CH by an iteration of property K posets. In fact in these models every compact Hausdorff space without non-trivial converging ω₁-sequences is first-countable and, in addition,...

Reflection implies the SCH

Saharon Shelah (2008)

Fundamenta Mathematicae

We prove that, e.g., if μ > cf(μ) = ℵ₀ and μ > 2 and every stationary family of countable subsets of μ⁺ reflects in some subset of μ⁺ of cardinality ℵ₁, then the SCH for μ⁺ holds (moreover, for μ⁺, any scale for μ⁺ has a bad stationary set of cofinality ℵ₁). This answers a question of Foreman and Todorčević who get such a conclusion from the simultaneous reflection of four stationary sets.

Currently displaying 41 – 60 of 208