The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

Displaying 2201 – 2220 of 3651

Showing per page

Operators preserving orthogonality of polynomials

Francisco Marcellán, Franciszek Szafraniec (1996)

Studia Mathematica

Let S be a degree preserving linear operator of ℝ[X] into itself. The question is if, preserving orthogonality of some orthogonal polynomial sequences, S must necessarily be an operator of composition with some affine function of ℝ. In [2] this problem was considered for S mapping sequences of Laguerre polynomials onto sequences of orthogonal polynomials. Here we improve substantially the theorems of [2] as well as disprove the conjecture proposed there. We also consider the same questions for polynomials...

Optimal estimates for the fractional Hardy operator

Yoshihiro Mizuta, Aleš Nekvinda, Tetsu Shimomura (2015)

Studia Mathematica

Let A α f ( x ) = | B ( 0 , | x | ) | - α / n B ( 0 , | x | ) f ( t ) d t be the n-dimensional fractional Hardy operator, where 0 < α ≤ n. It is well-known that A α is bounded from L p to L p α with p α = n p / ( α p - n p + n ) when n(1-1/p) < α ≤ n. We improve this result within the framework of Banach function spaces, for instance, weighted Lebesgue spaces and Lorentz spaces. We in fact find a ’source’ space S α , Y , which is strictly larger than X, and a ’target’ space T Y , which is strictly smaller than Y, under the assumption that A α is bounded from X into Y and the Hardy-Littlewood maximal operator...

Optimality of the range for which equivalence between certain measures of smoothness holds

Z. Ditzian (2010)

Studia Mathematica

Recently it was proved for 1 < p < ∞ that ω m ( f , t ) p , a modulus of smoothness on the unit sphere, and K ̃ ( f , t m ) p , a K-functional involving the Laplace-Beltrami operator, are equivalent. It will be shown that the range 1 < p < ∞ is optimal; that is, the equivalence ω m ( f , t ) p K ̃ ( f , t r ) p does not hold either for p = ∞ or for p = 1.

Currently displaying 2201 – 2220 of 3651