On signpost systems and connected graphs

Ladislav Nebeský

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal (2005)

  • Volume: 55, Issue: 2, page 283-293
  • ISSN: 0011-4642

Abstract

top
By a signpost system we mean an ordered pair ( W , P ) , where W is a finite nonempty set, P W × W × W and the following statements hold: if ( u , v , w ) P , then ( v , u , u ) P and ( v , u , w ) P , for all u , v , w W ; if u v , i then there exists r W such that ( u , r , v ) P , for all u , v W . We say that a signpost system ( W , P ) is smooth if the folowing statement holds for all u , v , x , y , z W : if ( u , v , x ) , ( u , v , z ) , ( x , y , z ) P , then ( u , v , y ) P . We say thay a signpost system ( W , P ) is simple if the following statement holds for all u , v , x , y W : if ( u , v , x ) , ( x , y , v ) P , then ( u , v , y ) , ( x , y , u ) P . By the underlying graph of a signpost system ( W , P ) we mean the graph G with V ( G ) = W and such that the following statement holds for all distinct u , v W : u and v are adjacent in G if and only if ( u , v , v ) P . The main result of this paper is as follows: If G is a graph, then the following three statements are equivalent: G is connected; G is the underlying graph of a simple smooth signpost system; G is the underlying graph of a smooth signpost system.

How to cite

top

Nebeský, Ladislav. "On signpost systems and connected graphs." Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal 55.2 (2005): 283-293. <http://eudml.org/doc/30945>.

@article{Nebeský2005,
abstract = {By a signpost system we mean an ordered pair $(W, P)$, where $W$ is a finite nonempty set, $P \subseteq W \times W \times W$ and the following statements hold: \[ \text\{if \} (u, v, w) \in P, \text\{ then \} (v, u, u) \in P\text\{ and \} (v, u, w) \notin P,\text\{ for all \}u, v, w \in W; \text\{ if \} u \ne v,i \text\{ then there exists \} r \in W \text\{ such that \} (u, r, v) \in P,\text\{ for all \} u, v \in W. \] We say that a signpost system $(W, P)$ is smooth if the folowing statement holds for all $u, v, x, y, z \in W$: if $(u, v, x), (u, v, z), (x, y, z) \in P$, then $(u, v, y) \in P$. We say thay a signpost system $(W, P)$ is simple if the following statement holds for all $u, v, x, y \in W$: if $(u, v, x), (x, y, v) \in P$, then $(u, v, y), (x, y, u) \in P$. By the underlying graph of a signpost system $(W, P)$ we mean the graph $G$ with $V(G) = W$ and such that the following statement holds for all distinct $u, v \in W$: $u$ and $v$ are adjacent in $G$ if and only if $(u,v, v) \in P$. The main result of this paper is as follows: If $G$ is a graph, then the following three statements are equivalent: $G$ is connected; $G$ is the underlying graph of a simple smooth signpost system; $G$ is the underlying graph of a smooth signpost system.},
author = {Nebeský, Ladislav},
journal = {Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal},
keywords = {connected graph; signpost system; connected graph; signpost system},
language = {eng},
number = {2},
pages = {283-293},
publisher = {Institute of Mathematics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic},
title = {On signpost systems and connected graphs},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/30945},
volume = {55},
year = {2005},
}

TY - JOUR
AU - Nebeský, Ladislav
TI - On signpost systems and connected graphs
JO - Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal
PY - 2005
PB - Institute of Mathematics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic
VL - 55
IS - 2
SP - 283
EP - 293
AB - By a signpost system we mean an ordered pair $(W, P)$, where $W$ is a finite nonempty set, $P \subseteq W \times W \times W$ and the following statements hold: \[ \text{if } (u, v, w) \in P, \text{ then } (v, u, u) \in P\text{ and } (v, u, w) \notin P,\text{ for all }u, v, w \in W; \text{ if } u \ne v,i \text{ then there exists } r \in W \text{ such that } (u, r, v) \in P,\text{ for all } u, v \in W. \] We say that a signpost system $(W, P)$ is smooth if the folowing statement holds for all $u, v, x, y, z \in W$: if $(u, v, x), (u, v, z), (x, y, z) \in P$, then $(u, v, y) \in P$. We say thay a signpost system $(W, P)$ is simple if the following statement holds for all $u, v, x, y \in W$: if $(u, v, x), (x, y, v) \in P$, then $(u, v, y), (x, y, u) \in P$. By the underlying graph of a signpost system $(W, P)$ we mean the graph $G$ with $V(G) = W$ and such that the following statement holds for all distinct $u, v \in W$: $u$ and $v$ are adjacent in $G$ if and only if $(u,v, v) \in P$. The main result of this paper is as follows: If $G$ is a graph, then the following three statements are equivalent: $G$ is connected; $G$ is the underlying graph of a simple smooth signpost system; $G$ is the underlying graph of a smooth signpost system.
LA - eng
KW - connected graph; signpost system; connected graph; signpost system
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/30945
ER -

References

top
  1. The Interval Function of a Graph. Math. Centre Tracts 132, Math. Centre, Amsterdam, 1980. (1980) MR0605838
  2. 10.7151/dmgt.1204, Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory 23 (2003), 309–324. (2003) MR2070159DOI10.7151/dmgt.1204
  3. 10.1023/A:1022404624515, Czechoslovak Math.  J. 47(122) (1997), 149–161. (1997) MR1435613DOI10.1023/A:1022404624515
  4. 10.1023/A:1022472700080, Czechoslovak Math.  J. 50(125) (2000), 3–14. (2000) MR1745453DOI10.1023/A:1022472700080
  5. 10.1023/A:1022401506441, Czechoslovak Math.  J. 50(125) (2000), 121–133. (2000) MR1745467DOI10.1023/A:1022401506441
  6. 10.1023/B:CMAJ.0000042383.98585.97, Czechoslovak Math.  J. 54(129) (2004), 445–456. (2004) MR2059265DOI10.1023/B:CMAJ.0000042383.98585.97

NotesEmbed ?

top

You must be logged in to post comments.

To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.

Only the controls for the widget will be shown in your chosen language. Notes will be shown in their authored language.

Tells the widget how many notes to show per page. You can cycle through additional notes using the next and previous controls.

    
                

Note: Best practice suggests putting the JavaScript code just before the closing </body> tag.