Displaying similar documents to “Mac Neille completion of centers and centers of Mac Neille completions of lattice effect algebras”

On central atoms of Archimedean atomic lattice effect algebras

Martin Kalina (2010)

Kybernetika

Similarity:

If element z of a lattice effect algebra ( E , , 0 , 1 ) is central, then the interval [ 0 , z ] is a lattice effect algebra with the new top element z and with inherited partial binary operation . It is a known fact that if the set C ( E ) of central elements of E is an atomic Boolean algebra and the supremum of all atoms of C ( E ) in E equals to the top element of E , then E is isomorphic to a direct product of irreducible effect algebras ([16]). In [10] Paseka and Riečanová published as open problem whether C ( E ) is...

Some non-multiplicative properties are l -invariant

Vladimir Vladimirovich Tkachuk (1997)

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

Similarity:

A cardinal function ϕ (or a property 𝒫 ) is called l -invariant if for any Tychonoff spaces X and Y with C p ( X ) and C p ( Y ) linearly homeomorphic we have ϕ ( X ) = ϕ ( Y ) (or the space X has 𝒫 ( X 𝒫 ) iff Y 𝒫 ). We prove that the hereditary Lindelöf number is l -invariant as well as that there are models of Z F C in which hereditary separability is l -invariant.

Sharp estimates for bubbling solutions of a fourth order mean field equation

Chang-Shou Lin, Juncheng Wei (2007)

Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa - Classe di Scienze

Similarity:

We consider a sequence of multi-bubble solutions u k of the following fourth order equation Δ 2 u k = ρ k h ( x ) e u k Ω h e u k in Ω , u k = Δ u k = 0 on Ω , ( * ) where h is a C 2 , β positive function, Ω is a bounded and smooth domain in 4 , and ρ k is a constant such that ρ k C . We show that (after extracting a subsequence), lim k + ρ k = 32 σ 3 m for some positive integer m 1 , where σ 3 is the area of the unit sphere in 4 . Furthermore, we obtain the following sharp estimates for  ρ k : ρ k - 32 σ 3 m = c 0 j = 1 m ϵ k , j 2 l j Δ G 4 ( p j , p l ) + Δ R 4 ( p j , p j ) + 1 32 σ 3 Δ log h ( p j ) + o j = 1 m ϵ k , j 2 where c 0 > 0 , log 64 ϵ k , j 4 = max x B δ ( p j ) u k ( x ) - log ( Ω h e u k ) and u k 32 σ 3 j = 1 m G 4 ( · , p j ) in C loc 4 ( Ω { p 1 , ... , p m } ) . This yields a bound of solutions as...