Displaying similar documents to “On entropy of patterns given by interval maps”

Minor cycles for interval maps

Michał Misiurewicz (1994)

Fundamenta Mathematicae

Similarity:

For continuous maps of an interval into itself we consider cycles (periodic orbits) that are non-reducible in the sense that there is no non-trivial partition into blocks of consecutive points permuted by the map. Among them we identify the miror ones. They are those whose existence does not imply existence of other non-reducible cycles of the same period. Moreover, we find minor patterns of a given period with minimal entropy.

Choice principles in Węglorz’ models

N. Brunner, Paul Howard, Jean Rubin (1997)

Fundamenta Mathematicae

Similarity:

Węglorz' models are models for set theory without the axiom of choice. Each one is determined by an atomic Boolean algebra. Here the algebraic properties of the Boolean algebra are compared to the set theoretic properties of the model.

Topological entropy on zero-dimensional spaces

Jozef Bobok, Ondřej Zindulka (1999)

Fundamenta Mathematicae

Similarity:

Let X be an uncountable compact metrizable space of topological dimension zero. Given any a ∈[0,∞] there is a homeomorphism on X whose topological entropy is a.

Homeomorphisms of inverse limit spaces of one-dimensional maps

Marcy Barge, Beverly Diamond (1995)

Fundamenta Mathematicae

Similarity:

We present a new technique for showing that inverse limit spaces of certain one-dimensional Markov maps are not homeomorphic. In particular, the inverse limit spaces for the three maps from the tent family having periodic kneading sequence of length five are not homeomorphic.

The Arkhangel’skiĭ–Tall problem: a consistent counterexample

Gary Gruenhage, Piotr Koszmider (1996)

Fundamenta Mathematicae

Similarity:

We construct a consistent example of a normal locally compact metacompact space which is not paracompact, answering a question of A. V. Arkhangel’skiĭ and F. Tall. An interplay between a tower in P(ω)/Fin, an almost disjoint family in [ ω ] ω , and a version of an (ω,1)-morass forms the core of the proof. A part of the poset which forces the counterexample can be considered a modification of a poset due to Judah and Shelah for obtaining a Q-set by a countable support iteration.