Préface. Anthropologie et philosophie : l’empirique et le principiel
Isabelle Delpla (2002)
Philosophia Scientiae
Similarity:
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
Isabelle Delpla (2002)
Philosophia Scientiae
Similarity:
Isabelle Delpla (2002)
Philosophia Scientiae
Similarity:
The principle of charity is here analysed as one form of interpretive benevolence whose aim is to give others credit and not to take them for idiots. In this very aim, however, it is in competition with other maxims, each of which fights against one kind of stupidity. That being the case, we must criticize the false alternatives between charity and contempt, on the one hand, and charity and nonsense, on the other. The principle of charity cannot be granted legitimacy as a principle specific...
Gérard Lenclud (2002)
Philosophia Scientiae
Similarity:
This article defends the position that anthropological interpretation is necessarily charitable to others. Nevertheless, given that charity seems to imply that others should systematically be absolved–in advance–of the mistakes they (like the interpreter) are likely to make and that these mistakes are significant (just as those of the interpreter are), it may be preferable to evoke a “Postulate of Equality” rather than the “Principle of Charity”.
Sandra Laugier (2002)
Philosophia Scientiae
Similarity:
The article examines the anthropological relevance of Quine’s indeterminacy of translation thesis, and shows how this thesis questions relativism, but also a species of universalism. This is demonstrated through an analysis of Quine’s critique of the idea of prelogicity, in connection with which he specifically devised the principle of charity, which was later taken over by Davidson. Examining the uses and scope of this principle, as well as comparing it to the claims of Lévy-Bruhl,...
Jean-Pierre Cometti (1997)
Philosophia Scientiae
Similarity:
Roger Pouivet (1997)
Philosophia Scientiae
Similarity:
Michael Esfeld (2005)
Philosophia Scientiae
Similarity:
L’objectif de cet article est de présenter une position dans le cadre du pragmatisme contemporain : le but est d’esquisser comment une théorie pragmatique peut expliquer la détermination du contenu conceptuel de nos croyances. La première partie expose la motivation d’une théorie pragmatiste du contenu conceptuel — à savoir notamment apporter une solution au problème de suivre des règles. La deuxième partie introduit l’idée d’une sémantique inférentielle. La troisième partie retrace...
Vincent Descombes (2002)
Philosophia Scientiae
Similarity:
This article, which emphasizes the hermeneutic origin of the principle of charity, attempts to resituate the contemporary theories within a tradition of reflection about the anthropological problem (how can we claim to reach an understanding of other types of human lives?). These doctrines actually propose a philosophy of common sense, in other words a solution to the problem of exercising rationality. Due to a failure to relate this common sense to any particular form of social life,...
Alain Boyer (2007)
Philosophia Scientiae
Similarity:
Le maître mot de la philosophie poppérienne est l’ouverture. Cette conception de la rationalité, fondée sur le thème de la faillibilité, échappe à la mise en question de la clôture de la raison moderne dominatrice. La rationalité n’est pas tant un ensemble de techniques qu’une attitude morale d’ouverture à l’autre, reposant sur l’idée qu’à la violence peut être substitué un jeu polémique, la discussion critique, codifiée par des règles. «Vous pouvez avoir raison et je peux avoir tort,...
Fabien Schang (2005)
Philosophia Scientiae
Similarity:
La position résolument extensionaliste de Quine a été appuyée par des arguments de nature différente, dans ses multiples articles destinés à rejeter le projet de logique modale. On peut classer ces arguments en trois catégories : un argument , où l’auteur tente de baser le langage scientifique sur une notation tâchée de décrire la “structure ultime de la réalité” ; un argument , où Quine fait allusion à des raisons de clarté et d’efficacité démonstrative pour privilégier la théorie des...