Displaying similar documents to “Linear elliptic equations with BMO coefficients”

BMO-scale of distribution on n

René Erlín Castillo, Julio C. Ramos Fernández (2008)

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal

Similarity:

Let S ' be the class of tempered distributions. For f S ' we denote by J - α f the Bessel potential of f of order α . We prove that if J - α f B M O , then for any λ ( 0 , 1 ) , J - α ( f ) λ B M O , where ( f ) λ = λ - n f ( φ ( λ - 1 · ) ) , φ S . Also, we give necessary and sufficient conditions in order that the Bessel potential of a tempered distribution of order α > 0 belongs to the V M O space.

On the H p - L q boundedness of some fractional integral operators

Pablo Rocha, Marta Urciuolo (2012)

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal

Similarity:

Let A 1 , , A m be n × n real matrices such that for each 1 i m , A i is invertible and A i - A j is invertible for i j . In this paper we study integral operators of the form T f ( x ) = k 1 ( x - A 1 y ) k 2 ( x - A 2 y ) k m ( x - A m y ) f ( y ) d y , k i ( y ) = j 2 j n / q i ϕ i , j ( 2 j y ) , 1 q i < , 1 / q 1 + 1 / q 2 + + 1 / q m = 1 - r , 0 r < 1 , and ϕ i , j satisfying suitable regularity conditions. We obtain the boundedness of T : H p ( n ) L q ( n ) for 0 < p < 1 / r and 1 / q = 1 / p - r . We also show that we can not expect the H p - H q boundedness of this kind of operators.

Korn's First Inequality with variable coefficients and its generalization

Waldemar Pompe (2003)

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

Similarity:

If Ω n is a bounded domain with Lipschitz boundary Ω and Γ is an open subset of Ω , we prove that the following inequality Ω | A ( x ) u ( x ) | p d x 1 / p + Γ | u ( x ) | p d n - 1 ( x ) 1 / p c u W 1 , p ( Ω ) holds for all u W 1 , p ( Ω ; m ) and 1 < p < , where ( A ( x ) u ( x ) ) k = i = 1 m j = 1 n a k i j ( x ) u i x j ( x ) ( k = 1 , 2 , ... , r ; r m ) defines an elliptic differential operator of first order with continuous coefficients on Ω ¯ . As a special case we obtain Ω u ( x ) F ( x ) + ( u ( x ) F ( x ) ) T p d x c Ω | u ( x ) | p d x , ( * ) for all u W 1 , p ( Ω ; n ) vanishing on Γ , where F : Ω ¯ M n × n ( ) is a continuous mapping with det F ( x ) μ > 0 . Next we show that ( * ) is not valid if n 3 , F L ( Ω ) and det F ( x ) = 1 , but does hold if p = 2 , Γ = Ω and F ( x ) is symmetric and positive definite in Ω .