Total domination versus paired domination

Oliver Schaudt

Displaying similar documents to “Total domination versus paired domination”

On the total k-domination number of graphs

Adel P. Kazemi (2012)

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory

Similarity:

Let k be a positive integer and let G = (V,E) be a simple graph. The k-tuple domination number $γ_{\times k} (G)$ of G is the minimum cardinality of a k-tuple dominating set S, a set that for every vertex v ∈ V, $| N_{G} [v] \cap S | \geq k$ . Also the total k-domination number $γ_{\times k, t} (G)$ of G is the minimum cardinality of a total k -dominating set S, a set that for every vertex v ∈ V, $| N_{G} (v) \cap S | \geq k$ . The k-transversal number τₖ(H) of a hypergraph H is the minimum size of a subset S ⊆ V(H) such that |S ∩e | ≥ k for every edge e ∈ E(H). We know that for...

Graphs with large double domination numbers

Michael A. Henning (2005)

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory

Similarity:

Domination Subdivision Numbers

Teresa W. Haynes, Sandra M. Hedetniemi, Stephen T. Hedetniemi, David P. Jacobs, James Knisely, Lucas C. van der Merwe (2001)

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory

Similarity:

A set S of vertices of a graph G = (V,E) is a dominating set if every vertex of V-S is adjacent to some vertex in S. The domination number γ(G) is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set of G, and the domination subdivision number $s d_{γ} (G)$ is the minimum number of edges that must be subdivided (each edge in G can be subdivided at most once) in order to increase the domination number. Arumugam conjectured that $1 \leq s d_{γ} (G) \leq 3$ for any graph G. We give a counterexample to this conjecture. On the other hand,...

On locating-domination in graphs

Mustapha Chellali, Malika Mimouni, Peter J. Slater (2010)

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory

Similarity:

A set D of vertices in a graph G = (V,E) is a locating-dominating set (LDS) if for every two vertices u,v of V-D the sets N(u)∩ D and N(v)∩ D are non-empty and different. The locating-domination number $γ_{L} (G)$ is the minimum cardinality of a LDS of G, and the upper locating-domination number, $Γ_{L} (G)$ is the maximum cardinality of a minimal LDS of G. We present different bounds on $Γ_{L} (G)$ and $γ_{L} (G)$ .

Secure domination and secure total domination in graphs

William F. Klostermeyer, Christina M. Mynhardt (2008)

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory

Similarity:

A secure (total) dominating set of a graph G = (V,E) is a (total) dominating set X ⊆ V with the property that for each u ∈ V-X, there exists x ∈ X adjacent to u such that $(X - x) \cup u$ is (total) dominating. The smallest cardinality of a secure (total) dominating set is the secure (total) domination number $γ_{s} (G) (γ_{s t} (G))$ . We characterize graphs with equal total and secure total domination numbers. We show that if G has minimum degree at least two, then $γ_{s t} (G) \leq γ_{s} (G)$ . We also show that $γ_{s t} (G)$ is at most twice the clique covering...

Roman bondage in graphs

Nader Jafari Rad, Lutz Volkmann (2011)

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory

Similarity:

A Roman dominating function on a graph G is a function f:V(G) → 0,1,2 satisfying the condition that every vertex u for which f(u) = 0 is adjacent to at least one vertex v for which f(v) = 2. The weight of a Roman dominating function is the value $f (V (G)) = \sum_{u \in V (G)} f (u)$ . The Roman domination number, $γ_{R} (G)$ , of G is the minimum weight of a Roman dominating function on G. In this paper, we define the Roman bondage $b_{R} (G)$ of a graph G with maximum degree at least two to be the minimum cardinality of all sets E’ ⊆ E(G)...

A remark on the (2,2)-domination number

Torsten Korneffel, Dirk Meierling, Lutz Volkmann (2008)

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory

Similarity:

A subset D of the vertex set of a graph G is a (k,p)-dominating set if every vertex v ∈ V(G)∖D is within distance k to at least p vertices in D. The parameter $γ_{k, p} (G)$ denotes the minimum cardinality of a (k,p)-dominating set of G. In 1994, Bean, Henning and Swart posed the conjecture that $γ_{k, p} (G) \leq (p / (p + k)) n (G)$ for any graph G with δₖ(G) ≥ k+p-1, where the latter means that every vertex is within distance k to at least k+p-1 vertices other than itself. In 2005, Fischermann and Volkmann confirmed this conjecture...

Maximal k-independent sets in graphs

Mostafa Blidia, Mustapha Chellali, Odile Favaron, Nacéra Meddah (2008)

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory

Similarity:

A subset of vertices of a graph G is k-independent if it induces in G a subgraph of maximum degree less than k. The minimum and maximum cardinalities of a maximal k-independent set are respectively denoted iₖ(G) and βₖ(G). We give some relations between βₖ(G) and $β_{j} (G)$ and between iₖ(G) and $i_{j} (G)$ for j ≠ k. We study two families of extremal graphs for the inequality i₂(G) ≤ i(G) + β(G). Finally we give an upper bound on i₂(G) and a lower bound when G is a cactus.

Paired domination in prisms of graphs

Christina M. Mynhardt, Mark Schurch (2011)

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory

Similarity:

The paired domination number $γ_{p r} (G)$ of a graph G is the smallest cardinality of a dominating set S of G such that ⟨S⟩ has a perfect matching. The generalized prisms πG of G are the graphs obtained by joining the vertices of two disjoint copies of G by |V(G)| independent edges. We provide characterizations of the following three classes of graphs: $γ_{p r} (π G) = 2 γ_{p r} (G)$ for all πG; $γ_{p r} (K ₂ ☐ G) = 2 γ_{p r} (G)$ ; $γ_{p r} (K ₂ ☐ G) = γ_{p r} (G)$ .

Domination and independence subdivision numbers of graphs

Teresa W. Haynes, Sandra M. Hedetniemi, Stephen T. Hedetniemi (2000)

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory

Similarity:

The domination subdivision number $s d_{γ} (G)$ of a graph is the minimum number of edges that must be subdivided (where an edge can be subdivided at most once) in order to increase the domination number. Arumugam showed that this number is at most three for any tree, and conjectured that the upper bound of three holds for any graph. Although we do not prove this interesting conjecture, we give an upper bound for the domination subdivision number for any graph G in terms of the minimum degrees of...

Upper bounds for the domination numbers of toroidal queens graphs

Christina M. Mynhardt (2003)

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory

Similarity:

We determine upper bounds for $γ (Q n^{t})$ and $i (Q ₙ^{t})$ , the domination and independent domination numbers, respectively, of the graph $Q ₙ^{t}$ obtained from the moves of queens on the n×n chessboard drawn on the torus.

Signed total domination number of a graph

Bohdan Zelinka (2001)

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal

Similarity:

The signed total domination number of a graph is a certain variant of the domination number. If $v$ is a vertex of a graph $G$ , then $N (v)$ is its oper neighbourhood, i.e. the set of all vertices adjacent to $v$ in $G$ . A mapping $f : V (G) \to {- 1, 1}$ , where $V (G)$ is the vertex set of $G$ , is called a signed total dominating function (STDF) on $G$ , if $\sum_{x \in N (v)} f (x) \geq 1$ for each $v \in V (G)$ . The minimum of values $\sum_{x \in V (G)} f (x)$ , taken over all STDF’s of $G$ , is called the signed total domination number of $G$ and denoted by $γ_{s t} (G)$ . A theorem stating lower bounds for $γ_{s t} (G)$ is...

Domination in partitioned graphs

Zsolt Tuza, Preben Dahl Vestergaard (2002)

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory

Similarity:

Let V₁, V₂ be a partition of the vertex set in a graph G, and let $γ_{i}$ denote the least number of vertices needed in G to dominate $V_{i}$ . We prove that γ₁+γ₂ ≤ [4/5]|V(G)| for any graph without isolated vertices or edges, and that equality occurs precisely if G consists of disjoint 5-paths and edges between their centers. We also give upper and lower bounds on γ₁+γ₂ for graphs with minimum valency δ, and conjecture that γ₁+γ₂ ≤ [4/(δ+3)]|V(G)| for δ ≤ 5. As δ gets large, however, the largest...

On double domination in graphs

Jochen Harant, Michael A. Henning (2005)

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory

Similarity:

In a graph G, a vertex dominates itself and its neighbors. A subset S ⊆ V(G) is a double dominating set of G if S dominates every vertex of G at least twice. The minimum cardinality of a double dominating set of G is the double domination number $γ_{\times 2} (G)$ . A function f(p) is defined, and it is shown that $γ_{\times 2} (G) = m i n f (p)$ , where the minimum is taken over the n-dimensional cube $C ⁿ = p = (p ₁, . . ., p ₙ) | p_{i} \in I R, 0 \leq p_{i} \leq 1, i = 1, . . ., n$ . Using this result, it is then shown that if G has order n with minimum degree δ and average degree d, then $γ_{\times 2} (G) \leq ((l n (1 + d) + l n δ + 1) / δ) n$ .

Full domination in graphs

Robert C. Brigham, Gary Chartrand, Ronald D. Dutton, Ping Zhang (2001)

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory

Similarity:

For each vertex v in a graph G, let there be associated a subgraph $H_{v}$ of G. The vertex v is said to dominate $H_{v}$ as well as dominate each vertex and edge of $H_{v}$ . A set S of vertices of G is called a full dominating set if every vertex of G is dominated by some vertex of S, as is every edge of G. The minimum cardinality of a full dominating set of G is its full domination number $γ_{F H} (G)$ . A full dominating set of G of cardinality $γ_{F H} (G)$ is called a $γ_{F H}$ -set of G. We study three types of full domination in...

A note on periodicity of the 2-distance operator

Bohdan Zelinka (2000)

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory

Similarity:

The paper solves one problem by E. Prisner concerning the 2-distance operator T₂. This is an operator on the class $C_{f}$ of all finite undirected graphs. If G is a graph from $C_{f}$ , then T₂(G) is the graph with the same vertex set as G in which two vertices are adjacent if and only if their distance in G is 2. E. Prisner asks whether the periodicity ≥ 3 is possible for T₂. In this paper an affirmative answer is given. A result concerning the periodicity 2 is added.

A characterization of locating-total domination edge critical graphs

Mostafa Blidia, Widad Dali (2011)

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory

Similarity:

For a graph G = (V,E) without isolated vertices, a subset D of vertices of V is a total dominating set (TDS) of G if every vertex in V is adjacent to a vertex in D. The total domination number γₜ(G) is the minimum cardinality of a TDS of G. A subset D of V which is a total dominating set, is a locating-total dominating set, or just a LTDS of G, if for any two distinct vertices u and v of V(G)∖D, $N_{G} (u) \cap D \neq N_{G} (v) \cap D$ . The locating-total domination number $γ_{L}^{t} (G)$ is the minimum cardinality of a locating-total...

The k-rainbow domatic number of a graph

Seyyed Mahmoud Sheikholeslami, Lutz Volkmann (2012)

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory

Similarity:

For a positive integer k, a k-rainbow dominating function of a graph G is a function f from the vertex set V(G) to the set of all subsets of the set 1,2, ...,k such that for any vertex v ∈ V(G) with f(v) = ∅ the condition ⋃u ∈ N(v)f(u) = 1,2, ...,k is fulfilled, where N(v) is the neighborhood of v. The 1-rainbow domination is the same as the ordinary domination. A set $f ₁, f ₂, . . ., f_{d}$ of k-rainbow dominating functions on G with the property that $\sum_{i = 1}^{d} | f_{i} (v) | \leq k$ for each v ∈ V(G), is called a k-rainbow dominating...

The geodetic number of strong product graphs

A.P. Santhakumaran, S.V. Ullas Chandran (2010)

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory

Similarity:

For two vertices u and v of a connected graph G, the set $I_{G} [u, v]$ consists of all those vertices lying on u-v geodesics in G. Given a set S of vertices of G, the union of all sets $I_{G} [u, v]$ for u,v ∈ S is denoted by $I_{G} [S]$ . A set S ⊆ V(G) is a geodetic set if $I_{G} [S] = V (G)$ and the minimum cardinality of a geodetic set is its geodetic number g(G) of G. Bounds for the geodetic number of strong product graphs are obtainted and for several classes improved bounds and exact values are obtained.