Displaying similar documents to “Normal integral bases and tameness conditions for Kummer extensions”

Relative Bogomolov extensions

Robert Grizzard (2015)

Acta Arithmetica

Similarity:

A subfield K ⊆ ℚ̅ has the Bogomolov property if there exists a positive ε such that no non-torsion point of K × has absolute logarithmic height below ε. We define a relative extension L/K to be Bogomolov if this holds for points of L × K × . We construct various examples of extensions which are and are not Bogomolov. We prove a ramification criterion for this property, and use it to show that such extensions can always be constructed if some rational prime has bounded ramification index in K. ...

Ergodicity of ℤ² extensions of irrational rotations

Yuqing Zhang (2011)

Studia Mathematica

Similarity:

Let = [0,1) be the additive group of real numbers modulo 1, α ∈ be an irrational number and t ∈ . We study ergodicity of skew product extensions T : × ℤ² → × ℤ², T ( x , s , s ) = ( x + α , s + 2 χ [ 0 , 1 / 2 ) ( x ) - 1 , s + 2 χ [ 0 , 1 / 2 ) ( x + t ) - 1 ) .

The power set of ω Elementary submodels and weakenings of CH

István Juhász, Kenneth Kunen (2001)

Fundamenta Mathematicae

Similarity:

We define a new principle, SEP, which is true in all Cohen extensions of models of CH, and explore the relationship between SEP and other such principles. SEP is implied by each of CH*, the weak Freeze-Nation property of (ω), and the (ℵ₁,ℵ₀)-ideal property. SEP implies the principle C s ( ω ) , but does not follow from C s ( ω ) , or even C s ( ω ) .

Preservation of properties of a map by forcing

Akira Iwasa (2022)

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

Similarity:

Let f : X Y be a continuous map such as an open map, a closed map or a quotient map. We study under what circumstances f remains an open, closed or quotient map in forcing extensions.

On the compositum of all degree d extensions of a number field

Itamar Gal, Robert Grizzard (2014)

Journal de Théorie des Nombres de Bordeaux

Similarity:

We study the compositum k [ d ] of all degree d extensions of a number field k in a fixed algebraic closure. We show k [ d ] contains all subextensions of degree less than d if and only if d 4 . We prove that for d > 2 there is no bound c = c ( d ) on the degree of elements required to generate finite subextensions of k [ d ] / k . Restricting to Galois subextensions, we prove such a bound does not exist under certain conditions on divisors of d , but that one can take c = d when d is prime. This question was inspired by work of...

Polynomial Imaginary Decompositions for Finite Separable Extensions

Adam Grygiel (2008)

Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences. Mathematics

Similarity:

Let K be a field and let L = K[ξ] be a finite field extension of K of degree m > 1. If f ∈ L[Z] is a polynomial, then there exist unique polynomials u , . . . , u m - 1 K [ X , . . . , X m - 1 ] such that f ( j = 0 m - 1 ξ j X j ) = j = 0 m - 1 ξ j u j . A. Nowicki and S. Spodzieja proved that, if K is a field of characteristic zero and f ≠ 0, then u , . . . , u m - 1 have no common divisor in K [ X , . . . , X m - 1 ] of positive degree. We extend this result to the case when L is a separable extension of a field K of arbitrary characteristic. We also show that the same is true for a formal power series in several...

A characterization of Eisenstein polynomials generating extensions of degree p 2 and cyclic of degree p 3 over an unramified 𝔭 -adic field

Maurizio Monge (2014)

Journal de Théorie des Nombres de Bordeaux

Similarity:

Let p 2 be a prime. We derive a technique based on local class field theory and on the expansions of certain resultants allowing to recover very easily Lbekkouri’s characterization of Eisenstein polynomials generating cyclic wild extensions of degree p 2 over p , and extend it to when the base fields K is an unramified extension of p . When a polynomial satisfies a subset of such conditions the first unsatisfied condition characterizes the Galois group of the normal closure. We...

Troesch complexes and extensions of strict polynomial functors

Antoine Touzé (2012)

Annales scientifiques de l'École Normale Supérieure

Similarity:

We develop a new approach of extension calculus in the category of strict polynomial functors, based on Troesch complexes. We obtain new short elementary proofs of numerous classical Ext -computations as well as new results. In particular, we get a cohomological version of the “fundamental theorems” from classical invariant theory for  G L n for  n big enough (and we give a conjecture for smaller values of  n ). We also study the “twisting spectral sequence” E s , t ( F , G , r ) converging to the extension groups...

Symbolic extensions in intermediate smoothness on surfaces

David Burguet (2012)

Annales scientifiques de l'École Normale Supérieure

Similarity:

We prove that 𝒞 r maps with r > 1 on a compact surface have symbolic extensions, i.e., topological extensions which are subshifts over a finite alphabet. More precisely we give a sharp upper bound on the so-called symbolic extension entropy, which is the infimum of the topological entropies of all the symbolic extensions. This answers positively a conjecture of S. Newhouse and T. Downarowicz in dimension two and improves a previous result of the author [11].

Extension operators on balls and on spaces of finite sets

Antonio Avilés, Witold Marciszewski (2015)

Studia Mathematica

Similarity:

We study extension operators between spaces of continuous functions on the spaces σ ( 2 X ) of subsets of X of cardinality at most n. As an application, we show that if B H is the unit ball of a nonseparable Hilbert space H equipped with the weak topology, then, for any 0 < λ < μ, there is no extension operator T : C ( λ B H ) C ( μ B H ) .

On sentences provable in impredicative extensions of theories

Zygmunt Ratajczyk

Similarity:

CONTENTS0. Introduction.......................................................................... 51. Preliminaries............................................................................... 72. Basic facts to be used in the sequel....................................... 113. Predicates OD(.,.) and CL(.,.).................................................... 174. Predicate Sels............................................................................. 185. Strong n 1 -collection...........................................................