This work deals with the analysis pertaining some dynamic behavior of vector solutions of first order two-dimensional neutral delay differential systems of the form $$\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}t}\left[\begin{array}{c}u\left(t\right)+pu(t-\tau )\\ v\left(t\right)+pv(t-\tau )\end{array}\right]=\left[\begin{array}{cc}a& b\\ c& d\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{c}u(t-\alpha )\\ v(t-\beta )\end{array}\right].$$ The effort has been made to study $$\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}t}\left[\begin{array}{c}x\left(t\right)-p\left(t\right)h_1\left(x(t-\tau )\right)\\ y\left(t\right)-p\left(t\right)h_2\left(y(t-\tau )\right)\end{array}\right]+\left[\begin{array}{cc}a\left(t\right)& b\left(t\right)\\ c\left(t\right)& d\left(t\right)\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{c}{f}_1\left(x(t-\alpha )\right)\\ f_2\left(y(t-\beta )\right)\end{array}\right]=0,$$ where $p,a,b,c,d,h_1,h_2,f_1,f_2\in C(ℝ,ℝ)$; $\alpha ,\beta ,\tau \in {ℝ}^{+}$. We verify our results with the examples.

For positive integers $n$, Euler’s phi function and Dedekind’s psi function are given by $$\phi \left(n\right)=n\prod _{\begin{array}{c}p\mid n\\ p\mathrm{prime}\end{array}}\left(1-\frac{1}{p}\right)\text{and}\psi \left(n\right)=n\prod _{\begin{array}{c}p\mid n\\ p\mathrm{prime}\end{array}}\left(1+\frac{1}{p}\right),$$ respectively. We prove that for all $n\ge 2$ we have $${\left(1-\frac{1}{n}\right)}^{n-1}{\left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)}^{n+1}\le {\left(\frac{\phi \left(n\right)}{n}\right)}^{\phi \left(n\right)}{\left(\frac{\psi \left(n\right)}{n}\right)}^{\psi \left(n\right)}$$ and $${\left(\frac{\phi \left(n\right)}{n}\right)}^{\psi \left(n\right)}{\left(\frac{\psi \left(n\right)}{n}\right)}^{\phi \left(n\right)}\le {\left(1-\frac{1}{n}\right)}^{n+1}{\left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)}^{n-1}.$$ The sign of equality holds if and only if $n$ is a prime. The first inequality refines results due to Atanassov (2011) and Kannan & Srikanth (2013).

Let $f$ be a continuous function on $I$ and $A$, $B\in {\mathrm{𝒮𝒜}}_I\left(H\right)$, the convex set of selfadjoint operators with spectra in $I$. If $A\ne B$ and $f$, as an operator function, is Gateaux differentiable on $$[A,B]:=\left\{(1-t)A+tB\mid t\in \left[0,1\right]\right\},$$ while $p:\left[0,1\right]\to ℝ$ is Lebesgue integrable, then we have the inequalities $$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill \parallel {\int }_0^{1}p\left(\tau \right)& f\left(\left(1-\tau \right)A+\tau B\right)d\tau -{\int }_0^{1}p\left(\tau \right)d\tau {\int }_0^{1}f\left(\left(1-\tau \right)A+\tau B\right)d\tau \parallel \hfill \\ & \le {\int }_0^1\tau (1-\tau )|\frac{{\int }_{\tau }^{1}p\left(s\right)ds}{1-\tau }-\frac{{\int }_0^{\tau }p\left(s\right)ds}{\tau }|∥\nabla f_{\left(1-\tau \right)A+\tau B}\left(B-A\right)∥d\tau \hfill \\ & \le \frac{1}{4}{\int }_0^1|\frac{{\int }_{\tau }^{1}p\left(s\right)ds}{1-\tau }-\frac{{\int }_0^{\tau }p\left(s\right)ds}{\tau }|∥\nabla f_{\left(1-\tau \right)A+\tau B}\left(B-A\right)∥d\tau ,\hfill \end{array}$$ where $\nabla f$ is the Gateaux derivative of $f$.

Let p > 3 be a prime, and let Rₚ be the set of rational numbers whose denominator is not divisible by p. Let Pₙ(x) be the Legendre polynomials. In this paper we mainly show that for m,n,t ∈ Rₚ with m≢ 0 (mod p), $P_{[p/6]}\left(t\right)\equiv -(3/p){\sum }_{x=0}^{p-1}((x³-3x+2t)/p)\left(modp\right)$ and $\left({\sum }_{x=0}^{p-1}((x³+mx+n)/p)\right)²\equiv ((-3m)/p){\sum }_{k=0}^{[p/6]}\left(\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{2k}{k}\right)\left(\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{3k}{k}\right)\left(\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{6k}{3k}\right){((4m³+27n²)/\left(12³·4m³\right))}^k\left(modp\right)$, where (a/p) is the Legendre symbol and [x] is the greatest integer function. As an application we solve some conjectures of Z. W. Sun and the author concerning ${\sum }_{k=0}^{p-1}\left(\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{2k}{k}\right)\left(\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{3k}{k}\right)\left(\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{6k}{3k}\right)/m^k\left(modp²\right)$, where m is an integer not divisible by p.

The purpose of the present paper is to determine lower bounds for $\Re \left\}\frac{{ℰ}_{k}f\left(z\right)}{{\left({ℰ}_{k}f\right)}_m\left(z\right)}\right\{$, $\Re \left\}\frac{{\left({ℰ}_{k}f\right)}_m\left(z\right)}{{ℰ}_{k}f\left(z\right)}\right\{,\Re \left\}\frac{{ℰ}_k^{\text{'}}f\left(z\right)}{{\left({ℰ}_{k}f\right)}_m^{\text{'}}\left(z\right)}\right\{$ and $\Re \left\}\frac{{\left({ℰ}_{k}f\right)}_m^{\text{'}}\left(z\right)}{{ℰ}_k^{\text{'}}f\left(z\right)}\right\{$, where ${ℰ}_{k}f$ is the generalized normalized error function of the form ${ℰ}_{k}f\left(z\right)=z+{\sum }_{n=2}^{\infty }\frac{{\left(-1\right)}^{n-1}}{(\left(n-1\right)k+1)\left(n-1\right)!}{z}^n$ and ${\left({ℰ}_{k}f\right)}_m$ its partial sum. Furthermore, we give lower bounds for $\Re \left\}\frac{𝕀\left[{ℰ}_{k}f\right]\left(z\right)}{{\left(𝕀\left[{ℰ}_{k}f\right]\right)}_m\left(z\right)}\right\{$ and $\Re \left\}\frac{{\left(𝕀\left[{ℰ}_{k}f\right]\right)}_m\left(z\right)}{𝕀\left[{ℰ}_{k}f\right]\left(z\right)}\right\{$, where $𝕀\left[{ℰ}_{k}f\right]$ is the Alexander transform of ${ℰ}_{k}f$. Several examples of the main results are also considered.

This Note is the continuation of a previous paper with the same title. Here (Part II) we show that for every choice of the sequence $u{}_a(\cdot )$, ${\mathrm{\Sigma }}_a$'s trajectory $l_a$ after the instant $d+\eta a$ tends in a certain natural sense, as $a\to \mathrm{\infty }$, to a certain geodesic $l$ of $V_d$, with origin at $\left(\overline{q},\overline{u}\right)$. Incidentally $l$ is independent of the choice of applied forces in a neighbourhood of $\left(\overline{q},\overline{u}\right)$ arbitrarily prefixed.