This work deals with the analysis pertaining some dynamic behavior of vector solutions of first order two-dimensional neutral delay differential systems of the form $$\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}t}\left[\begin{array}{c}u\left(t\right)+pu(t-\tau )\\ v\left(t\right)+pv(t-\tau )\end{array}\right]=\left[\begin{array}{cc}a& b\\ c& d\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{c}u(t-\alpha )\\ v(t-\beta )\end{array}\right].$$ The effort has been made to study $$\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}t}\left[\begin{array}{c}x\left(t\right)-p\left(t\right)h_1\left(x(t-\tau )\right)\\ y\left(t\right)-p\left(t\right)h_2\left(y(t-\tau )\right)\end{array}\right]+\left[\begin{array}{cc}a\left(t\right)& b\left(t\right)\\ c\left(t\right)& d\left(t\right)\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{c}{f}_1\left(x(t-\alpha )\right)\\ f_2\left(y(t-\beta )\right)\end{array}\right]=0,$$ where $p,a,b,c,d,h_1,h_2,f_1,f_2\in C(ℝ,ℝ)$; $\alpha ,\beta ,\tau \in {ℝ}^{+}$. We verify our results with the examples.

For positive integers $n$, Euler’s phi function and Dedekind’s psi function are given by $$\phi \left(n\right)=n\prod _{\begin{array}{c}p\mid n\\ p\mathrm{prime}\end{array}}\left(1-\frac{1}{p}\right)\text{and}\psi \left(n\right)=n\prod _{\begin{array}{c}p\mid n\\ p\mathrm{prime}\end{array}}\left(1+\frac{1}{p}\right),$$ respectively. We prove that for all $n\ge 2$ we have $${\left(1-\frac{1}{n}\right)}^{n-1}{\left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)}^{n+1}\le {\left(\frac{\phi \left(n\right)}{n}\right)}^{\phi \left(n\right)}{\left(\frac{\psi \left(n\right)}{n}\right)}^{\psi \left(n\right)}$$ and $${\left(\frac{\phi \left(n\right)}{n}\right)}^{\psi \left(n\right)}{\left(\frac{\psi \left(n\right)}{n}\right)}^{\phi \left(n\right)}\le {\left(1-\frac{1}{n}\right)}^{n+1}{\left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)}^{n-1}.$$ The sign of equality holds if and only if $n$ is a prime. The first inequality refines results due to Atanassov (2011) and Kannan & Srikanth (2013).

Let $f$ be a continuous function on $I$ and $A$, $B\in {\mathrm{𝒮𝒜}}_I\left(H\right)$, the convex set of selfadjoint operators with spectra in $I$. If $A\ne B$ and $f$, as an operator function, is Gateaux differentiable on $$[A,B]:=\left\{(1-t)A+tB\mid t\in \left[0,1\right]\right\},$$ while $p:\left[0,1\right]\to ℝ$ is Lebesgue integrable, then we have the inequalities $$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill \parallel {\int }_0^{1}p\left(\tau \right)& f\left(\left(1-\tau \right)A+\tau B\right)d\tau -{\int }_0^{1}p\left(\tau \right)d\tau {\int }_0^{1}f\left(\left(1-\tau \right)A+\tau B\right)d\tau \parallel \hfill \\ & \le {\int }_0^1\tau (1-\tau )|\frac{{\int }_{\tau }^{1}p\left(s\right)ds}{1-\tau }-\frac{{\int }_0^{\tau }p\left(s\right)ds}{\tau }|∥\nabla f_{\left(1-\tau \right)A+\tau B}\left(B-A\right)∥d\tau \hfill \\ & \le \frac{1}{4}{\int }_0^1|\frac{{\int }_{\tau }^{1}p\left(s\right)ds}{1-\tau }-\frac{{\int }_0^{\tau }p\left(s\right)ds}{\tau }|∥\nabla f_{\left(1-\tau \right)A+\tau B}\left(B-A\right)∥d\tau ,\hfill \end{array}$$ where $\nabla f$ is the Gateaux derivative of $f$.

Let p > 3 be a prime, and let Rₚ be the set of rational numbers whose denominator is not divisible by p. Let Pₙ(x) be the Legendre polynomials. In this paper we mainly show that for m,n,t ∈ Rₚ with m≢ 0 (mod p), $P_{[p/6]}\left(t\right)\equiv -(3/p){\sum }_{x=0}^{p-1}((x³-3x+2t)/p)\left(modp\right)$ and $\left({\sum }_{x=0}^{p-1}((x³+mx+n)/p)\right)²\equiv ((-3m)/p){\sum }_{k=0}^{[p/6]}\left(\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{2k}{k}\right)\left(\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{3k}{k}\right)\left(\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{6k}{3k}\right){((4m³+27n²)/\left(12³·4m³\right))}^k\left(modp\right)$, where (a/p) is the Legendre symbol and [x] is the greatest integer function. As an application we solve some conjectures of Z. W. Sun and the author concerning ${\sum }_{k=0}^{p-1}\left(\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{2k}{k}\right)\left(\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{3k}{k}\right)\left(\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{6k}{3k}\right)/m^k\left(modp²\right)$, where m is an integer not divisible by p.

This Note is the continuation of a previous paper with the same title. Here (Part II) we show that for every choice of the sequence $u{}_a(\cdot )$, ${\mathrm{\Sigma }}_a$'s trajectory $l_a$ after the instant $d+\eta a$ tends in a certain natural sense, as $a\to \mathrm{\infty }$, to a certain geodesic $l$ of $V_d$, with origin at $\left(\overline{q},\overline{u}\right)$. Incidentally $l$ is independent of the choice of applied forces in a neighbourhood of $\left(\overline{q},\overline{u}\right)$ arbitrarily prefixed.

Suppose that in a ballot candidate $A$ scores $a$ votes and candidate $B$ scores $b$ votes and that all possible $\left(a+ba\right)$ voting sequences are equally probable. Denote by ${\alpha }_r$ and by ${\beta }_r$ the number of votes registered for $A$ and for $B$, respectively, among the first $r$ votes recorded, $r=1,\cdots ,a+b$. The purpose of this paper is to derive, for $a\ge b-c$, the probability distributions of the random variables defined as the number of subscripts $r=1,\cdots ,a+b$ for which (i) ${\alpha }_r={\beta }_r-c$, (ii) ${\alpha }_r={\beta }_r-c$ but ${\alpha }_{r-1}={\beta }_{r-1}-c\pm 1$, (iii) ${\alpha }_r={\beta }_r-c$ but ${\alpha }_{r-1}={\beta }_{r-1}-c\pm 1$ and ${\alpha }_{r+1}={\beta }_{r+1}-c\pm 1$, where $c=0,\pm 1,\pm 2,\cdots$.

Let [...] f(z)=∑n=0∞αnzn $f\left(z\right)={\sum }_{n=0}^{\infty }{\alpha }_n{z}^n$ be a function defined by power series with complex coefficients and convergent on the open disk D (0, R) ⊂ ℂ, R > 0. For any x, y ∈ ℬ, a Banach algebra, with ‖x‖, ‖y‖ < R we show among others that [...] ‖f(y)−f(x)‖≤‖y−x‖∫01fa′(‖(1−t)x+ty‖)dt $$∥f\left(y\right)-f\left(x\right)∥\le ∥y-x∥{\int }_0^1{f}_a^{\text{'}}\left(∥(1-t)x+ty∥\right)dt$$ where [...] fa(z)=∑n=0∞|αn| zn $f_a\left(z\right)={\sum }_{n=0}^{\infty }|{\alpha }_n|z^n$ . Inequalities for the commutator such as [...] ‖f(x)f(y)−f(y)f(x)‖≤2fa(M)fa′(M)‖y−x‖, $$∥f\left(x\right)f\left(y\right)-f\left(y\right)f\left(x\right)∥\le 2f_a\left(M\right)f_a^{\text{'}}\left(M\right)∥y-x∥,$$ if ‖x‖, ‖y‖ ≤ M < R, as well as some inequalities of Hermite–Hadamard type are also provided. ...

Let $x=x_0{x}_1\cdots$ be a fixed point of a substitution on the alphabet $\left\{a,b\right\},$ and let $U_a=\left(\begin{array}{cc}\hfill -1& \hfill -1\\ \hfill 0& \hfill 1\end{array}\right)$ and $U_b=\left(\begin{array}{cc}\hfill 1& \hfill 1\\ \hfill 0& \hfill 1\end{array}\right)$. We give a complete classification of the substitutions $\sigma :{\left\{a,b\right\}}^{☆}$ according to whether the sequence of matrices ${\left(U_{x_0}{U}_{x_1}\cdots U_{x_n}\right)}_{n=0}^{\infty }$ is bounded or unbounded. This corresponds to the boundedness or unboundedness of the oriented walks generated by the substitutions.