Displaying similar documents to “Rings with divisibility on descending chains of ideals”

On a theorem of McCoy

Rajendra K. Sharma, Amit B. Singh (2024)

Mathematica Bohemica

Similarity:

We study McCoy’s theorem to the skew Hurwitz series ring ( HR , ω ) for some different classes of rings such as: semiprime rings, APP rings and skew Hurwitz serieswise quasi-Armendariz rings. Moreover, we establish an equivalence relationship between a right zip ring and its skew Hurwitz series ring in case when a ring R satisfies McCoy’s theorem of skew Hurwitz series.

A unified approach to the Armendariz property of polynomial rings and power series rings

Tsiu-Kwen Lee, Yiqiang Zhou (2008)

Colloquium Mathematicae

Similarity:

A ring R is called Armendariz (resp., Armendariz of power series type) if, whenever ( i 0 a i x i ) ( j 0 b j x j ) = 0 in R[x] (resp., in R[[x]]), then a i b j = 0 for all i and j. This paper deals with a unified generalization of the two concepts (see Definition 2). Some known results on Armendariz rings are extended to this more general situation and new results are obtained as consequences. For instance, it is proved that a ring R is Armendariz of power series type iff the same is true of R[[x]]. For an injective endomorphism...

An intermediate ring between a polynomial ring and a power series ring

M. Tamer Koşan, Tsiu-Kwen Lee, Yiqiang Zhou (2013)

Colloquium Mathematicae

Similarity:

Let R[x] and R[[x]] respectively denote the ring of polynomials and the ring of power series in one indeterminate x over a ring R. For an ideal I of R, denote by [R;I][x] the following subring of R[[x]]: [R;I][x]: = i 0 r i x i R [ [ x ] ] : ∃ 0 ≤ n∈ ℤ such that r i I , ∀ i ≥ n. The polynomial and power series rings over R are extreme cases where I = 0 or R, but there are ideals I such that neither R[x] nor R[[x]] is isomorphic to [R;I][x]. The results characterizing polynomial rings or power series rings with...

Commutativity of associative rings through a Streb's classification

Mohammad Ashraf (1997)

Archivum Mathematicum

Similarity:

Let m 0 , r 0 , s 0 , q 0 be fixed integers. Suppose that R is an associative ring with unity 1 in which for each x , y R there exist polynomials f ( X ) X 2 Z Z [ X ] , g ( X ) , h ( X ) X Z Z [ X ] such that { 1 - g ( y x m ) } [ x , x r y - x s f ( y x m ) x q ] { 1 - h ( y x m ) } = 0 . Then R is commutative. Further, result is extended to the case when the integral exponents in the above property depend on the choice of x and y . Finally, commutativity of one sided s-unital ring is also obtained when R satisfies some related ring properties.

Commutativity of rings through a Streb’s result

Moharram A. Khan (2000)

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal

Similarity:

In this paper we investigate commutativity of rings with unity satisfying any one of the properties: { 1 - g ( y x m ) } [ y x m - x r f ( y x m ) x s , x ] { 1 - h ( y x m ) } = 0 , { 1 - g ( y x m ) } [ x m y - x r f ( y x m ) x s , x ] { 1 - h ( y x m ) } = 0 , y t [ x , y n ] = g ( x ) [ f ( x ) , y ] h ( x ) a n d [ x , y n ] y t = g ( x ) [ f ( x ) , y ] h ( x ) for some f ( X ) in X 2 [ X ] and g ( X ) , h ( X ) in [ X ] , where m 0 , r 0 , s 0 , n > 0 , t > 0 are non-negative integers. We also extend these results to the case when integral exponents in the underlying conditions are no longer fixed, rather they depend on the pair of ring elements x and y for their values. Further, under different appropriate constraints on commutators, commutativity of rings has been studied. These results...

A commutativity theorem for associative rings

Mohammad Ashraf (1995)

Archivum Mathematicum

Similarity:

Let m > 1 , s 1 be fixed positive integers, and let R be a ring with unity 1 in which for every x in R there exist integers p = p ( x ) 0 , q = q ( x ) 0 , n = n ( x ) 0 , r = r ( x ) 0 such that either x p [ x n , y ] x q = x r [ x , y m ] y s or x p [ x n , y ] x q = y s [ x , y m ] x r for all y R . In the present paper it is shown that R is commutative if it satisfies the property Q ( m ) (i.e. for all x , y R , m [ x , y ] = 0 implies [ x , y ] = 0 ).