Let $P(\lambda ,D)={\sum }_{\left|\alpha \right|\le m}{a}_{\alpha }\left(\lambda \right)D^{\alpha }$ be a differential operator with constant coefficients $a_{\alpha }$ depending analytically on a parameter $\lambda$. Assume that the family $\{$ P($\lambda$,D)$\}$ is of constant strength. We investigate the equation $P(\lambda ,D){𝔣}_{\lambda }\equiv g_{\lambda }$ where ${𝔤}_{\lambda }$ is a given analytic function of $\lambda$ with values in some space of distributions and the solution ${𝔣}_{\lambda }$ is required to depend analytically on $\lambda$, too. As a special case we obtain a regular fundamental solution of P($\lambda$,D) which depends analytically on $\lambda$. This result answers a question of L. Hörmander. ...

Given an embeddable $CR$ manifold $M$ and a non-characteristic hypersurface $S\subset M$ we present a necessary condition for the tangential Cauchy-Riemann operator ${\overline{\partial }}_M$ on $M$ to be locally solvable near a point $x_0\in S$ determined by $S$.

For $a\in {\mathbf{R}}^n\setminus \left\{0\right\}$ and $\Omega$ an open bounded subset of ${\mathbf{R}}^n$ definie $L^p(\Omega ,a)$ as the closed subset of $L^p\left(\Omega \right)$ consisting of all functions that are constant almost everywhere on almost all lines parallel to $a$. For a given set of directions $a^{\nu }\in {\mathbf{R}}^n\setminus \left\{0\right\}$, $\nu =1,...,m$, we study for which $\Omega$ it is true that the vector space $$(*)L^p(\Omega ,a^1)+\cdots +L^p(\Omega ,a^m)\text{is}\text{a}\text{closed}\text{subspace}\text{of}{L}^p\left(\Omega \right).$$ This problem arizes naturally in the study of image reconstruction from projections (tomography). An essentially equivalent problem is to decide whether a certain matrix-valued differential operator...

$C^k$ estimates for convex domains of finite type in ${ℂ}^n$ are known from [] for $k=0$ and from [] for $k\>0$. We want to show the same result for concave domains of finite type. As in the case of strictly pseudoconvex domain, we fit the method used in the convex case to the concave one by switching $z$ and $\zeta$ in the integral kernel of the operator used in the convex case. However the kernel will not have the same behavior on the boundary as in the Diederich-Fischer-Fornæss-Alexandre work....

Let $M$ be a free module over a noetherian ring. For ${\omega }_1,...,{\omega }_k\in M$, let $𝒜$ be the ideal generated by coefficients of ${\omega }_1\wedge ...\wedge {\omega }_k$. For an element $\omega \in {\bigwedge }^{p}M$ with $p\<\mathrm{prof}.𝒜$, if $\omega \wedge {\omega }_1\wedge ...\wedge {\omega }_k=0$, there exists ${\eta }_1,...,{\eta }_k\in {\bigwedge }^{p-1}M$ such that $\omega ={\sum }_{i=1}^k{\eta }_i\wedge {\omega }_i$. This is a generalization of a lemma on the division of forms due to de Rham (Comment. Math. Helv., 28 (1954)) and has some applications to the study of singularities.

Let $Q={\left(Q_k\right)}_{k\ge 0},Q_0=1,Q_{k+1}=q_k{Q}_k,q_k\ge 2$, be a Cantor scale, ${𝐙}_Q$ the compact projective limit group of the groups $𝐙/Q_k𝐙$, identified to ${\prod }_{0\le j\le k-1}𝐙/q_j𝐙$, and let $\mu$ be its normalized Haar measure. To an element $x=\{a_0,a_1,a_2,\cdots \},0\le a_k\le q_{k+1}-1$, of ${𝐙}_Q$ we associate the sequence of integral valued random variables $x_k={\sum }_{0\le j\le k}{a}_j{Q}_j$. The main result of this article is that, given a complex $𝐐$-multiplicative function $g$ of modulus $1$, we have $$\underset{x_k\to x}{lim}(\frac{1}{x_k}\sum _{n\le x_k-1}g\left(n\right)-\prod _{0\le j\le k}\frac{1}{q_j}\sum _{0\le a\le q_j}g\left(a{Q}_j\right))=0\mu \text{-a.e}.$$