Displaying 321 – 340 of 729

Showing per page

On monadic quantale algebras: basic properties and representation theorems

Sergey A. Solovyov (2010)

Discussiones Mathematicae - General Algebra and Applications

Motivated by the concept of quantifier (in the sense of P. Halmos) on different algebraic structures (Boolean algebras, Heyting algebras, MV-algebras, orthomodular lattices, bounded distributive lattices) and the resulting notion of monadic algebra, the paper introduces the concept of a monadic quantale algebra, considers its properties and provides several representation theorems for the new structures.

On Monk’s questions

Saharon Shelah (1996)

Fundamenta Mathematicae

We deal with Boolean algebras and their cardinal functions: π-weight π and π-character πχ. We investigate the spectrum of π-weights of subalgebras of a Boolean algebra B. Next we show that the π-character of an ultraproduct of Boolean algebras may be different from the ultraproduct of the π-characters of the factors.

On MPT-implication functions for fuzzy logic.

Enric Trillas, Claudi Alsina, Ana Pradera (2004)

RACSAM

This paper deals with numerical functions J : [0,1] x [0,1] → [0,1] able to functionally express operators →: [0,1]X x [0,1]Y → [0,1]XxY defined as (μ → σ)(x,y) = J(μ(x),σ(y)), and verifying either Modus Ponens or Modus Tollens, or both. The concrete goal of the paper is to search for continuous t-norms T and strong-negation functions N for which it is either T(a, J(a,b)) ≤ b (Modus Ponens) or T(N(b), J(a,b)) ≤ N(a) (Modus Tollens), or both, for all a,b in [0,1] and a given J. Functions J are taken...

On Multiset Ordering

Grzegorz Bancerek (2016)

Formalized Mathematics

Formalization of a part of [11]. Unfortunately, not all is possible to be formalized. Namely, in the paper there is a mistake in the proof of Lemma 3. It states that there exists x ∈ M1 such that M1(x) > N1(x) and (∀y ∈ N1)x ⊀ y. It should be M1(x) ⩾ N1(x). Nevertheless we do not know whether x ∈ N1 or not and cannot prove the contradiction. In the article we referred to [8], [9] and [10].

On n × m-valued Łukasiewicz-Moisil algebras

Claudia Sanza (2008)

Open Mathematics

n×m-valued Łukasiewicz algebras with negation were introduced and investigated in [20, 22, 23]. These algebras constitute a non trivial generalization of n-valued Łukasiewicz-Moisil algebras and in what follows, we shall call them n×m-valued Łukasiewicz-Moisil algebras (or LM n×m -algebras). In this paper, the study of this new class of algebras is continued. More precisely, a topological duality for these algebras is described and a characterization of LM n×m -congruences in terms of special subsets...

On NIP and invariant measures

Ehud Hrushovski, Anand Pillay (2011)

Journal of the European Mathematical Society

We study forking, Lascar strong types, Keisler measures and definable groups, under an assumption of NIP (not the independence property), continuing aspects of the paper [16]. Among key results are (i) if p = tp ( b / A ) does not fork over A then the Lascar strong type of b over A coincides with the compact strong type of b over A and any global nonforking extension of p is Borel definable over bdd ( A ) , (ii) analogous statements for Keisler measures and definable groups, including the fact that G 000 = G 00 for G definably amenable,...

On nonmeasurable images

Robert Rałowski, Szymon Żeberski (2010)

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal

Let ( X , 𝕀 ) be a Polish ideal space and let T be any set. We show that under some conditions on a relation R T 2 × X it is possible to find a set A T such that R ( A 2 ) is completely 𝕀 -nonmeasurable, i.e, it is 𝕀 -nonmeasurable in every positive Borel set. We also obtain such a set A T simultaneously for continuum many relations ( R α ) α < 2 ω . Our results generalize those from the papers of K. Ciesielski, H. Fejzić, C. Freiling and M. Kysiak.

Currently displaying 321 – 340 of 729