The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

Page 1 Next

Displaying 1 – 20 of 68

Showing per page

A note on Δ₁ induction and Σ₁ collection

Neil Thapen (2005)

Fundamenta Mathematicae

Slaman recently proved that Σₙ collection is provable from Δₙ induction plus exponentiation, partially answering a question of Paris. We give a new version of this proof for the case n = 1, which only requires the following very weak form of exponentiation: " x y exists for some y sufficiently large that x is smaller than some primitive recursive function of y".

An application of a reflection principle

Zofia Adamowicz, Leszek Aleksander Kołodziejczyk, Paweł Zbierski (2003)

Fundamenta Mathematicae

We define a recursive theory which axiomatizes a class of models of IΔ₀ + Ω ₃ + ¬ exp all of which share two features: firstly, the set of Δ₀ definable elements of the model is majorized by the set of elements definable by Δ₀ formulae of fixed complexity; secondly, Σ₁ truth about the model is recursively reducible to the set of true Σ₁ formulae of fixed complexity.

Currently displaying 1 – 20 of 68

Page 1 Next