Invariance for multiples of the twisted canonical bundle

Benoît Claudon[1]

  • [1] Université Nancy 1 Institut Elie Cartan BP 239 54506 Vandœuvre–lès–Nancy Cedex (France)

Annales de l’institut Fourier (2007)

  • Volume: 57, Issue: 1, page 289-300
  • ISSN: 0373-0956

Abstract

top
Let 𝒳 Δ a smooth projective family and ( L , h ) a pseudo-effective line bundle on 𝒳 (i.e. with a non-negative curvature current Θ h L ). In its works on invariance of plurigenera, Y.-T. Siu was interested in extending sections of m K 𝒳 0 + L (defined over the central fiber of the family 𝒳 0 ) to sections of m K 𝒳 + L . In this article we consider the following problem: to extend sections of m ( K 𝒳 + L ) . More precisely, we show the following result: assuming the triviality of the multiplier ideal sheaf ( 𝒳 0 , h | 𝒳 0 ) , any section of m ( K 𝒳 0 + L ) extends to 𝒳  ; in other words, the restriction map: H 0 ( 𝒳 , m ( K 𝒳 + L ) ) H 0 ( 𝒳 0 , m ( K 𝒳 0 + L ) ) is surjective.At the end of this paper, we compare this result to the case of projective manifolds: in this situation an analogous statement (due to S. Takayama) is given to extend (twisted) pluricanonical sections. This lead us to discuss the different positivity assumptions required in extension results.

How to cite

top

Claudon, Benoît. "Invariance for multiples of the twisted canonical bundle." Annales de l’institut Fourier 57.1 (2007): 289-300. <http://eudml.org/doc/10222>.

@article{Claudon2007,
abstract = {Let $\mathcal\{X\}\rightarrow \Delta $ a smooth projective family and $(L,h)$ a pseudo-effective line bundle on $\mathcal\{X\}$ (i.e. with a non-negative curvature current $\Theta \{h\}\{L\}$). In its works on invariance of plurigenera, Y.-T. Siu was interested in extending sections of $mK_\{\mathcal\{X\}_0\}+L$ (defined over the central fiber of the family $\mathcal\{X\}_0$) to sections of $mK_\mathcal\{X\}+L$. In this article we consider the following problem: to extend sections of $m(K_\mathcal\{X\}+L)$. More precisely, we show the following result: assuming the triviality of the multiplier ideal sheaf $\mathcal\{I\}(\mathcal\{X\}_0,h_\{\vert \mathcal\{X\}_0\})$, any section of $m(K_\{\mathcal\{X\}_0\}+L)$ extends to $\mathcal\{X\}$ ; in other words, the restriction map:\[H^0(\mathcal\{X\},m(K\_\{\mathcal\{X\}\}+L))\rightarrow H^0(\mathcal\{X\}\_0,m(K\_\{\mathcal\{X\}\_0\}+L))\]is surjective.At the end of this paper, we compare this result to the case of projective manifolds: in this situation an analogous statement (due to S. Takayama) is given to extend (twisted) pluricanonical sections. This lead us to discuss the different positivity assumptions required in extension results.},
affiliation = {Université Nancy 1 Institut Elie Cartan BP 239 54506 Vandœuvre–lès–Nancy Cedex (France)},
author = {Claudon, Benoît},
journal = {Annales de l’institut Fourier},
keywords = {Extensions of pluricanonical sections; invariance of plurigenera; pseudoeffective line bundle; singular metric; multiplier ideal sheaf; extensions of pluricanonical sections; pseudo-effective line bundle},
language = {eng},
number = {1},
pages = {289-300},
publisher = {Association des Annales de l’institut Fourier},
title = {Invariance for multiples of the twisted canonical bundle},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/10222},
volume = {57},
year = {2007},
}

TY - JOUR
AU - Claudon, Benoît
TI - Invariance for multiples of the twisted canonical bundle
JO - Annales de l’institut Fourier
PY - 2007
PB - Association des Annales de l’institut Fourier
VL - 57
IS - 1
SP - 289
EP - 300
AB - Let $\mathcal{X}\rightarrow \Delta $ a smooth projective family and $(L,h)$ a pseudo-effective line bundle on $\mathcal{X}$ (i.e. with a non-negative curvature current $\Theta {h}{L}$). In its works on invariance of plurigenera, Y.-T. Siu was interested in extending sections of $mK_{\mathcal{X}_0}+L$ (defined over the central fiber of the family $\mathcal{X}_0$) to sections of $mK_\mathcal{X}+L$. In this article we consider the following problem: to extend sections of $m(K_\mathcal{X}+L)$. More precisely, we show the following result: assuming the triviality of the multiplier ideal sheaf $\mathcal{I}(\mathcal{X}_0,h_{\vert \mathcal{X}_0})$, any section of $m(K_{\mathcal{X}_0}+L)$ extends to $\mathcal{X}$ ; in other words, the restriction map:\[H^0(\mathcal{X},m(K_{\mathcal{X}}+L))\rightarrow H^0(\mathcal{X}_0,m(K_{\mathcal{X}_0}+L))\]is surjective.At the end of this paper, we compare this result to the case of projective manifolds: in this situation an analogous statement (due to S. Takayama) is given to extend (twisted) pluricanonical sections. This lead us to discuss the different positivity assumptions required in extension results.
LA - eng
KW - Extensions of pluricanonical sections; invariance of plurigenera; pseudoeffective line bundle; singular metric; multiplier ideal sheaf; extensions of pluricanonical sections; pseudo-effective line bundle
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/10222
ER -

References

top
  1. J.-P. Demailly, private communication 
  2. J.-P. Demailly, T. Peternell, M. Schneider, Compact complex manifolds with numerically effective tangent bndles, J. Alg. Geom. 3 (1994), 295-345 Zbl0827.14027MR1257325
  3. T. Oshawa, K. Takegoshi, On the extension of L 2 holomorphic functions, Math. Z. 195 (1987), 197-204 Zbl0625.32011MR892051
  4. M. Paun, Siu’s Invariance of Plurigenera : a One-Tower Proof, preprint (2005) Zbl1122.32014
  5. Y.-T. Siu, Extension of pluricanonical sections with plurisubharmonic weight and invariance of semipositively twisted plurigenera for manifolds not necessarily of general type, Complex Geometry (2002), 223-277, springer Zbl1007.32010MR1922108
  6. S. Takayama, Pluricanonical systems on algebraic varieties of general type, preprint (2005) Zbl1108.14031

NotesEmbed ?

top

You must be logged in to post comments.

To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.

Only the controls for the widget will be shown in your chosen language. Notes will be shown in their authored language.

Tells the widget how many notes to show per page. You can cycle through additional notes using the next and previous controls.

    
                

Note: Best practice suggests putting the JavaScript code just before the closing </body> tag.