The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
De nombreux travaux se sont efforcés au cours des années récentes de calculer la probabilité des paradoxes ou des difficultés que la théorie des choix collectifs a mis en évidence. On passe en revue dans cette note les principaux modèles de calcul utilisés dans ces travaux. On applique en outre l'un des modèles présentés au calcul de la probabilité de quelques paradoxes bien connus de la théorie du vote.
Sequential scoring rules are multi-stage social choice tules that
work as follows: at each stage of the process, a score
is computed for each alternative by taking into account its position
in the individual preference rankings, and the
alternative with the lowest score is eliminated. The current paper
studies the ability of these rules for choosing the
Condorcet winner (or the strong Condorcet winner) when individual
preferences are single-peaked.
Download Results (CSV)