On some distributional multiplicative products
Let , , , , . We prove under these conditions, the formula of interchange of the Fourier transformation of convolution of into the product of their Fourier trasforms: (see, for the definitions of these notations, formulae (1), (1') and Theorem). As an immediate consequence of formula (2) we obtain where , , , . It may be observed that, in the particular case , , the distributions turn out to be the elliptic M. Riesz kernel of which they are "causal" ("anticausal") analogues; and...
We give a sense to certain divergent convolutions of the form (see, for the definition of these notations, formulae (2), (4), (5)). As an application of our formulae we obtain the explicit value of a constant which appears in a formula of Fuglede (see [1], p. 7, Lemma 3.1). We observe that many of the "divergences" appearing in quantum field theory are precisely divergent convolutions of the form (see [2], pp. 151-183).
We evaluate (formula (2,2)) the Hankel transform of the distribution . As a consequence of (2,2) we obtain where designates the area of the unit sphere in . We also give a direct proof of this formula, which plays a role in the theory of the spherical summability of Fourier integrals.
Let and be fixed integers; even ; . Let , , be differentiable and such that . We prove that, under these conditions, the integral equation (2) admits the solution (4). In the particular case , (which is important in the quantum theory of fields) the reciprocal formulae (2) and (4) have already been obtained (on the basis of heuristical considerations) by Källen [1].
The distributions (formula (1)) share many properties with the Bessel kernel, of which they are "causal" ("anticausal") analogues. In particular (Theorem 1), , , . The essential tool for the proof of this formula is the multiplication formula (4), namely which is valid for every . It follows from Theorem (1) that , is, for , , a causal (anticausal) elementary solution of the n-dimensional Klein-Gordon operator, iterated times (Theorem 2). The particular case , is important in the...
As a generalization of formula (1,3), due to Guerra (cfr. [3]), which is useful in quantum theory of fields, we prove formula (3,1).
Page 1