Displaying similar documents to “How subadditive are subadditive capacities?”

Ordered spaces with special bases

Harold Bennett, David Lutzer (1998)

Fundamenta Mathematicae

Similarity:

We study the roles played by four special types of bases (weakly uniform bases, ω-in-ω bases, open-in-finite bases, and sharp bases) in the classes of linearly ordered and generalized ordered spaces. For example, we show that a generalized ordered space has a weakly uniform base if and only if it is quasi-developable and has a G δ -diagonal, that a linearly ordered space has a point-countable base if and only if it is first-countable and has an ω-in-ω base, and that metrizability in a generalized...

Are initially ω 1 -compact separable regular spaces compact?

Alan Dow, Istvan Juhász (1997)

Fundamenta Mathematicae

Similarity:

We investigate the question of the title. While it is immediate that CH yields a positive answer we discover that the situation under the negation of CH holds some surprises.

Analytic gaps

Stevo Todorčević (1996)

Fundamenta Mathematicae

Similarity:

We investigate when two orthogonal families of sets of integers can be separated if one of them is analytic.

Borel and Baire reducibility

Harvey Friedman (2000)

Fundamenta Mathematicae

Similarity:

We prove that a Borel equivalence relation is classifiable by countable structures if and only if it is Borel reducible to a countable level of the hereditarily countable sets. We also prove the following result which was originally claimed in [FS89]: the zero density ideal of sets of natural numbers is not classifiable by countable structures.

Each nowhere dense nonvoid closed set in Rn is a σ-limit set

Andrei Sivak (1996)

Fundamenta Mathematicae

Similarity:

We discuss main properties of the dynamics on minimal attraction centers (σ-limit sets) of single trajectories for continuous maps of a compact metric space into itself. We prove that each nowhere dense nonvoid closed set in ℝ n , n ≥ 1, is a σ-limit set for some continuous map.

Connected covers and Neisendorfer's localization theorem

C. McGibbon, J. Møller (1997)

Fundamenta Mathematicae

Similarity:

Our point of departure is J. Neisendorfer's localization theorem which reveals a subtle connection between some simply connected finite complexes and their connected covers. We show that even though the connected covers do not forget that they came from a finite complex their homotopy-theoretic properties are drastically different from those of finite complexes. For instance, connected covers of finite complexes may have uncountable genus or nontrivial SNT sets, their Lusternik-Schnirelmann...

The σ-ideal of closed smooth sets does not have the covering property

Carlos Uzcátegui (1996)

Fundamenta Mathematicae

Similarity:

We prove that the σ-ideal I(E) (of closed smooth sets with respect to a non-smooth Borel equivalence relation E) does not have the covering property. In fact, the same holds for any σ-ideal containing the closed transversals with respect to an equivalence relation generated by a countable group of homeomorphisms. As a consequence we show that I(E) does not have a Borel basis.