The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

Displaying similar documents to “Intuitionistic double negation as a necessity operator.”

From Intuitionism to Brouwer's Modal Logic

Zofia Kostrzycka (2020)

Bulletin of the Section of Logic

Similarity:

We try to translate the intuitionistic propositional logic INT into Brouwer's modal logic KTB. Our translation is motivated by intuitions behind Brouwer's axiom p →☐◊p The main idea is to interpret intuitionistic implication as modal strict implication, whereas variables and other positive sentences remain as they are. The proposed translation preserves fragments of the Rieger-Nishimura lattice which is the Lindenbaum algebra of monadic formulas in INT. Unfortunately, INT is not embedded...

New Modification of the Subformula Property for a Modal Logic

Mitio Takano (2020)

Bulletin of the Section of Logic

Similarity:

A modified subformula property for the modal logic KD with the additionalaxiom □ ◊(A ∨ B) ⊃ □ ◊ A ∨ □ ◊B is shown. A new modification of the notion of subformula is proposed for this purpose. This modification forms a natural extension of our former one on which modified subformula property for the modal logics K5, K5D and S4.2 has been shown ([2] and [4]). The finite model property as well as decidability for the logic follows from this.

Semantical Proof of Subformula Property for the Modal Logics K4.3, KD4.3, and S4.3

Daishi Yazaki (2019)

Bulletin of the Section of Logic

Similarity:

The main purpose of this paper is to give alternative proofs of syntactical and semantical properties, i.e. the subformula property and the nite model property, of the sequent calculi for the modal logics K4.3, KD4.3, and S4.3. The application of the inference rules is said to be acceptable, if all the formulas in the upper sequents are subformula of the formulas in lower sequent. For some modal logics, Takano analyzed the relationships between the acceptable inference rules and semantical...

A Modified Subformula Property for the Modal Logic S4.2

Mitio Takano (2019)

Bulletin of the Section of Logic

Similarity:

The modal logic S4.2 is S4 with the additional axiom ◊□A ⊃ □◊A. In this article, the sequent calculus GS4.2 for this logic is presented, and by imposing an appropriate restriction on the application of the cut-rule, it is shown that, every GS4.2-provable sequent S has a GS4.2-proof such that every formula occurring in it is either a subformula of some formula in S, or the formula □¬□B or ¬□B, where □B occurs in the scope of some occurrence of □ in some formula of S. These are just the...

Intuitionistic logic considered as an extension of classical logic : some critical remarks

Javier Legris, Jorge A. Molina (2001)

Philosophia Scientiae

Similarity:

In this paper we analyze the consideration of intuitionistic logic as an extension of classical logic. This — at first sight surprising — point of view has been sustained explicitly by Jan Łukasiewicz on the basis of a mapping of classical propositional logic into intuitionistic propositional logic by Kurt Gödel in 1933. Simultaneously with Gödel, Gerhard Gentzen had proposed another mapping of Peano´s arithmetic into Heyting´s arithmetic. We shall discuss these mappings in connection...

Useful Four-Valued Extension of the Temporal Logic KtT4

Vincent Degauquier (2018)

Bulletin of the Section of Logic

Similarity:

The temporal logic KtT4 is the modal logic obtained from the minimal temporal logic Kt by requiring the accessibility relation to be reflexive (which corresponds to the axiom T) and transitive (which corresponds to the axiom 4). This article aims, firstly, at providing both a model-theoretic and a proof-theoretic characterisation of a four-valued extension of the temporal logic KtT4 and, secondly, at identifying some of the most useful properties of this extension in the context of partial...

Universality of Logic

Jan Woleński (2017)

Bulletin of the Section of Logic

Similarity:

This paper deals with the problem of universality property of logic. At first, this property is analyzed in the context of first-order logic. Three senses of the universality property are distinguished: universal applicability, topical neutrality and validity (truth in all models). All theses senses can be proved to be justified. The fourth understanding, namely the amount of expressive power, is connected with the criticism of the first-order thesis: first-order logic is the logic....