-Amalgams IV
We relate some features of Bruhat-Tits buildings and their compactifications to tropical geometry. If G is a semisimple group over a suitable non-Archimedean field, the stabilizers of points in the Bruhat-Tits building of G and in some of its compactifications are described by tropical linear algebra. The compactifications we consider arise from algebraic representations of G. We show that the fan which is used to compactify an apartment in this theory is given by the weight polytope of the representation...
We investigate Bruhat-Tits buildings and their compactifications by means of Berkovich analytic geometry over complete non-Archimedean fields. For every reductive group over a suitable non-Archimedean field we define a map from the Bruhat-Tits building to the Berkovich analytic space associated with . Composing this map with the projection of to its flag varieties, we define a family of compactifications of . This generalizes results by Berkovich in the case of split groups. Moreover,...
Let be a building of arbitrary type. A compactification of the set of spherical residues of is introduced. We prove that it coincides with the horofunction compactification of endowed with a natural combinatorial distance which we call the root-distance. Points of admit amenable stabilisers in and conversely, any amenable subgroup virtually fixes a point in . In addition, it is shown that, provided is transitive enough, this compactification also coincides with the group-theoretic...
La notion de complète réductibilité d’une représentation linéaire peut se définir en termes de l’action de sur l’immeuble de Tits de . Cela suggère une notion analogue pour tous les immeubles sphériques, et donc aussi pour tous les groupes réductifs. On verra comment cette notion se traduit en termes topologiques et quelles applications on peut en tirer.
We consider for an affine building of type Helgason's conjecture with respect to Laplace operators defined over different types of vertices. We prove that there are cases in which the conjecture fails, since there exist eigenfunctions which are not the Poisson transform of finitely additive measures at the maximal boundary of the building.