The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
Displaying 1701 –
1720 of
3896
Let be a multiplicative monoid. If is a non-singular ring such that the class of all non-singular -modules is a cover class, then the class of all non-singular -modules is a cover class. These two conditions are equivalent whenever is a well-ordered cancellative monoid such that for all elements with there is such that . For a totally ordered cancellative monoid the equalities and hold, being Goldie’s torsion theory.
Weakly associative lattice rings (wal-rings) are non-transitive generalizations of lattice ordered rings (l-rings). As is known, the class of l-rings which are subdirect products of linearly ordered rings (i.e. the class of f-rings) plays an important role in the theory of l-rings. In the paper, the classes of wal-rings representable as subdirect products of to-rings and ao-rings (both being non-transitive generalizations of the class of f-rings) are characterized and the class of wal-rings having...
We consider algebras determined by all normal identities of basic algebras. For such algebras, we present a representation based on a q-lattice, i.e., the normalization of a lattice.
We consider algebras determined by all normal identities of -algebras, i.e. algebras of many-valued logics. For such algebras, we present a representation based on a normalization of a sectionally involutioned lattice, i.e. a -lattice, and another one based on a normalization of a lattice-ordered group.
We get an interrelation between an algebraic closure system and its conjugated interior system. We introduce the concept of algebraic interior system and we get its representation.
In this note, we point out that Theorem 3.1 as well as Theorem 3.5 in G. D. Çaylı and F. Karaçal (Kybernetika 53 (2017), 394-417) contains a superfluous condition. We have also generalized them by using closure (interior, resp.) operators.
Currently displaying 1701 –
1720 of
3896