Let $G$ be a graph of order $n$ and $\lambda \left(G\right)$ the spectral radius of its adjacency matrix. We extend some recent results on sufficient conditions for Hamiltonian paths and cycles in $G$. One of the main results of the paper is the following theorem: Let $k\ge 2,$ $n\ge k^3+k+4,$ and let $G$ be a graph of order $n$, with minimum degree $\delta \left(G\right)\ge k.$ If $$\lambda \left(G\right)\ge n-k-1,$$ then $G$ has a Hamiltonian cycle, unless $G=K_1\vee (K_{n-k-1}+K_k)$ or $G=K_k\vee (K_{n-2k}+{\overline{K}}_k).$

An orientation of a simple graph is referred to as an oriented graph. Caccetta and Häggkvist conjectured that any digraph on $n$ vertices with minimum outdegree $d$ contains a directed cycle of length at most $\lceil n/d\rceil$. In this paper, we consider short cycles in oriented graphs without directed triangles. Suppose that ${\alpha }_0$ is the smallest real such that every $n$-vertex digraph with minimum outdegree at least ${\alpha }_{0}n$ contains a directed triangle. Let $ϵ<(3-2{\alpha }_0)/(4-2{\alpha }_0)$ be a positive real. We show that if $D$ is an oriented graph...

The Ramsey number $R(G,H)$ for a pair of graphs $G$ and $H$ is defined as the smallest integer $n$ such that, for any graph $F$ on $n$ vertices, either $F$ contains $G$ or $\overline{F}$ contains $H$ as a subgraph, where $\overline{F}$ denotes the complement of $F$. We study Ramsey numbers for some subgraphs of generalized wheels versus cycles and paths and determine these numbers for some cases. We extend many known results studied in [5, 14, 18, 19, 20]. In particular we count the numbers $R(K_1+L_n,P_m)$ and $R(K_1+L_n,C_m)$ for some integers $m$, $n$, where $L_n$ is...

A proper vertex coloring of a graph $G$ is acyclic if there is no bicolored cycle in $G$. In other words, each cycle of $G$ must be colored with at least three colors. Given a list assignment $L=\left\{L\right(v):v\in V\}$, if there exists an acyclic coloring $\pi$ of $G$ such that $\pi \left(v\right)\in L\left(v\right)$ for all $v\in V$, then we say that $G$ is acyclically $L$-colorable. If $G$ is acyclically $L$-colorable for any list assignment $L$ with $\left|L\right(v\left)\right|\ge k$ for all $v\in V$, then $G$ is acyclically $k$-choosable. In 2006, Montassier, Raspaud and Wang conjectured that every planar graph without...

The line graph of a graph $G$, denoted by $L\left(G\right)$, has $E\left(G\right)$ as its vertex set, where two vertices in $L\left(G\right)$ are adjacent if and only if the corresponding edges in $G$ have a vertex in common. For a graph $H$, define ${\overline{\sigma }}_2\left(H\right)=min\{d\left(u\right)+d\left(v\right):uv\in E\left(H\right)\}$. Let $H$ be a 2-connected claw-free simple graph of order $n$ with $\delta \left(H\right)\ge 3$. We show that, if ${\overline{\sigma }}_2\left(H\right)\ge \frac{1}{7}(2n-5)$ and $n$ is sufficiently large, then either $H$ is traceable or the Ryjáček’s closure $\mathrm{cl}\left(H\right)=L\left(G\right)$, where $G$ is an essentially $2$-edge-connected triangle-free graph that can be contracted to one of the two graphs of order 10...

Let $ex(n,G)$ denote the maximum number of edges in a graph on $n$ vertices which does not contain $G$ as a subgraph. Let $P_i$ denote a path consisting of $i$ vertices and let $m{P}_i$ denote $m$ disjoint copies of $P_i$. In this paper we count $ex(n,3P_4)$.

A graph $G$ is $H$-saturated if it contains no $H$ as a subgraph, but does contain $H$ after the addition of any edge in the complement of $G$. The saturation number, $\mathrm{sat}(n,H)$, is the minimum number of edges of a graph in the set of all $H$-saturated graphs of order $n$. We determine the saturation number $\mathrm{sat}(n,P_6+t{P}_2)$ for $n\ge \frac{10}{3}t+10$ and characterize the extremal graphs for $n>\frac{10}{3}t+20$.

An even factor of a graph is a spanning subgraph in which each vertex has a positive even degree. Let $G$ be a bridgeless simple graph with minimum degree at least $3$. Jackson and Yoshimoto (2007) showed that $G$ has an even factor containing two arbitrary prescribed edges. They also proved that $G$ has an even factor in which each component has order at least four. Moreover, Xiong, Lu and Han (2009) showed that for each pair of edges $e_1$ and $e_2$ of $G$, there is an even factor containing $e_1$ and $e_2$...

A directed Cayley graph $C(\Gamma ,X)$ is specified by a group $\Gamma$ and an identity-free generating set $X$ for this group. Vertices of $C(\Gamma ,X)$ are elements of $\Gamma$ and there is a directed edge from the vertex $u$ to the vertex $v$ in $C(\Gamma ,X)$ if and only if there is a generator $x\in X$ such that $ux=v$. We study graphs $C(\Gamma ,X)$ for the direct product $Z_m\times Z_n$ of two cyclic groups $Z_m$ and $Z_n$, and the generating set $X=\left\{\right(0,1),(1,0),(2,0),\cdots ,(p,0\left)\right\}$. We present resolving sets which yield upper bounds on the metric dimension of these graphs for $p=2$ and $3$.

A graph $X$, with a group $G$ of automorphisms of $X$, is said to be $(G,s)$-transitive, for some $s\ge 1$, if $G$ is transitive on $s$-arcs but not on $(s+1)$-arcs. Let $X$ be a connected $(G,s)$-transitive graph of prime valency $p\ge 5$, and $G_v$ the vertex stabilizer of a vertex $v\in V\left(X\right)$. Suppose that $G_v$ is solvable. Weiss (1974) proved that $|G_v{|\mid p(p-1)}^2$. In this paper, we prove that $G_v\cong ({\mathbb{Z}}_p⋊{\mathbb{Z}}_m)\times {\mathbb{Z}}_n$ for some positive integers $m$ and $n$ such that $ndivm$ and $m\mid p-1$.

The generalized $k$-connectivity ${\kappa }_k\left(G\right)$ of a graph $G$ was introduced by Chartrand et al. in 1984. As a natural counterpart of this concept, Li et al. in 2011 introduced the concept of generalized $k$-edge-connectivity which is defined as ${\lambda }_k\left(G\right)=min\{\lambda \left(S\right):S\subseteq V\left(G\right)$ and $\left|S\right|=k\}$, where $\lambda \left(S\right)$ denotes the maximum number $\ell$ of pairwise edge-disjoint trees $T_1,T_2,...,T_{\ell }$ in $G$ such that $S\subseteq V\left(T_i\right)$ for $1\le i\le \ell$. In this paper we prove that for any two connected graphs $G$ and $H$ we have ${\lambda }_3(G\square H)\ge {\lambda }_3\left(G\right)+{\lambda }_3\left(H\right)$, where $G\square H$ is the Cartesian product of $G$ and $H$. Moreover, the bound is sharp. We also...