Displaying similar documents to “Filter factors of truncated TLS regularization with multiple observations”

Relative co-annihilators in lattice equality algebras

Sogol Niazian, Mona Aaly Kologani, Rajab Ali Borzooei (2024)

Mathematica Bohemica

Similarity:

We introduce the notion of relative co-annihilator in lattice equality algebras and investigate some important properties of it. Then, we obtain some interesting relations among -irreducible filters, positive implicative filters, prime filters and relative co-annihilators. Given a lattice equality algebra 𝔼 and 𝔽 a filter of 𝔼 , we define the set of all 𝔽 -involutive filters of 𝔼 and show that by defining some operations on it, it makes a BL-algebra.

Balcar's theorem on supports

Lev Bukovský (2018)

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

Similarity:

In A theorem on supports in the theory of semisets [Comment. Math. Univ. Carolinae 14 (1973), no. 1, 1–6] B. Balcar showed that if σ D M is a support, M being an inner model of ZFC, and 𝒫 ( D σ ) M = r ` ` σ with r M , then r determines a preorder " " of D such that σ becomes a filter on ( D , ) generic over M . We show that if the relation r is replaced by a function 𝒫 ( D σ ) M = f - 1 ( σ ) , then there exists an equivalence relation " " on D and a partial order on D / such that D / is a complete Boolean algebra, σ / is a generic filter and [ f ( u ) ] = - ( u / ) for...

P λ -sets and skeletal mappings

Aleksander Błaszczyk, Anna Brzeska (2013)

Colloquium Mathematicae

Similarity:

We prove that if the topology on the set Seq of all finite sequences of natural numbers is determined by P λ -filters and λ ≤ , then Seq is a P λ -set in its Čech-Stone compactification. This improves some results of Simon and of Juhász and Szymański. As a corollary we obtain a generalization of a result of Burke concerning skeletal maps and we partially answer a question of his.

G -supplemented property in the lattices

Shahabaddin Ebrahimi Atani (2022)

Mathematica Bohemica

Similarity:

Let L be a lattice with the greatest element 1 . Following the concept of generalized small subfilter, we define g -supplemented filters and investigate the basic properties and possible structures of these filters.

On preimages of ultrafilters in ZF

Horst Herrlich, Paul Howard, Kyriakos Keremedis (2016)

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

Similarity:

We show that given infinite sets X , Y and a function f : X Y which is onto and n -to-one for some n , the preimage of any ultrafilter of Y under f extends to an ultrafilter. We prove that the latter result is, in some sense, the best possible by constructing a permutation model with a set of atoms A and a finite-to-one onto function f : A ω such that for each free ultrafilter of ω its preimage under f does not extend to an ultrafilter. In addition, we show that in there exists an ultrafilter compact...

On the mappings 𝒵 A and A in intermediate rings of C ( X )

Mehdi Parsinia (2018)

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

Similarity:

In this article, we investigate new topological descriptions for two well-known mappings 𝒵 A and A defined on intermediate rings A ( X ) of C ( X ) . Using this, coincidence of each two classes of z -ideals, 𝒵 A -ideals and A -ideals of A ( X ) is studied. Moreover, we answer five questions concerning the mapping A raised in [J. Sack, S. Watson, C and C * among intermediate rings, Topology Proc. 43 (2014), 69–82].

Coherent ultrafilters and nonhomogeneity

Jan Starý (2015)

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

Similarity:

We introduce the notion of a coherent P -ultrafilter on a complete ccc Boolean algebra, strengthening the notion of a P -point on ω , and show that these ultrafilters exist generically under 𝔠 = 𝔡 . This improves the known existence result of Ketonen [On the existence of P -points in the Stone-Čech compactification of integers, Fund. Math. 92 (1976), 91–94]. Similarly, the existence theorem of Canjar [On the generic existence of special ultrafilters, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 110 (1990), no. 1,...

On the real X -ranks of points of n ( ) with respect to a real variety X n

Edoardo Ballico (2010)

Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska, sectio A – Mathematica

Similarity:

Let  X n be an integral and non-degenerate m -dimensional variety defined over . For any P n ( ) the real X -rank r X , ( P ) is the minimal cardinality of S X ( ) such that P S . Here we extend to the real case an upper bound for the X -rank due to Landsberg and Teitler.

Theoretical analysis for 1 - 2 minimization with partial support information

Haifeng Li, Leiyan Guo (2025)

Applications of Mathematics

Similarity:

We investigate the recovery of k -sparse signals using the 1 - 2 minimization model with prior support set information. The prior support set information, which is believed to contain the indices of nonzero signal elements, significantly enhances the performance of compressive recovery by improving accuracy, efficiency, reducing complexity, expanding applicability, and enhancing robustness. We assume k -sparse signals 𝐱 with the prior support T which is composed of g true indices and b wrong...

(Generalized) filter properties of the amalgamated algebra

Yusof Azimi (2022)

Archivum Mathematicum

Similarity:

Let R and S be commutative rings with unity, f : R S a ring homomorphism and J an ideal of S . Then the subring R f J : = { ( a , f ( a ) + j ) a R and j J } of R × S is called the amalgamation of R with S along J with respect to f . In this paper, we determine when R f J is a (generalized) filter ring.

Possible isolation number of a matrix over nonnegative integers

LeRoy B. Beasley, Young Bae Jun, Seok-Zun Song (2018)

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal

Similarity:

Let + be the semiring of all nonnegative integers and A an m × n matrix over + . The rank of A is the smallest k such that A can be factored as an m × k matrix times a k × n matrix. The isolation number of A is the maximum number of nonzero entries in A such that no two are in any row or any column, and no two are in a 2 × 2 submatrix of all nonzero entries. We have that the isolation number of A is a lower bound of the rank of A . For A with isolation number k , we investigate the possible values of the...

Factorization of CP-rank- 3 completely positive matrices

Jan Brandts, Michal Křížek (2016)

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal

Similarity:

A symmetric positive semi-definite matrix A is called completely positive if there exists a matrix B with nonnegative entries such that A = B B . If B is such a matrix with a minimal number p of columns, then p is called the cp-rank of A . In this paper we develop a finite and exact algorithm to factorize any matrix A of cp-rank 3 . Failure of this algorithm implies that A does not have cp-rank 3 . Our motivation stems from the question if there exist three nonnegative polynomials of degree at...

Cardinalities of DCCC normal spaces with a rank 2-diagonal

Wei-Feng Xuan, Wei-Xue Shi (2016)

Mathematica Bohemica

Similarity:

A topological space X has a rank 2-diagonal if there exists a diagonal sequence on X of rank 2 , that is, there is a countable family { 𝒰 n : n ω } of open covers of X such that for each x X , { x } = { St 2 ( x , 𝒰 n ) : n ω } . We say that a space X satisfies the Discrete Countable Chain Condition (DCCC for short) if every discrete family of nonempty open subsets of X is countable. We mainly prove that if X is a DCCC normal space with a rank 2-diagonal, then the cardinality of X is at most 𝔠 . Moreover, we prove that if X is a first...

Repdigits in the base b as sums of four balancing numbers

Refik Keskin, Faticko Erduvan (2021)

Mathematica Bohemica

Similarity:

The sequence of balancing numbers ( B n ) is defined by the recurrence relation B n = 6 B n - 1 - B n - 2 for n 2 with initial conditions B 0 = 0 and B 1 = 1 . B n is called the n th balancing number. In this paper, we find all repdigits in the base b , which are sums of four balancing numbers. As a result of our theorem, we state that if B n is repdigit in the base b and has at least two digits, then ( n , b ) = ( 2 , 5 ) , ( 3 , 6 ) . Namely, B 2 = 6 = ( 11 ) 5 and B 3 = 35 = ( 55 ) 6 .