The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
Displaying 421 –
440 of
663
A dominating set in a graph is a connected dominating set of if it induces a connected subgraph of . The connected domatic number of is the maximum number of pairwise disjoint, connected dominating sets in . We establish a sharp lower bound on the number of edges in a connected graph with a given order and given connected domatic number. We also show that a planar graph has connected domatic number at most 4 and give a characterization of planar graphs having connected domatic number 3.
A dominating set in a graph is a connected dominating set of if it induces a connected subgraph of . The minimum number of vertices in a connected dominating set of is called the connected domination number of , and is denoted by . Let be a spanning subgraph of and let be the complement of relative to ; that is, is a factorization of . The graph is --critical relative to if and for each edge . First, we discuss some classes of graphs whether they are -critical relative...
We consider finite graphs G with vertex set V(G). For a subset S ⊆ V(G), we define by G[S] the subgraph induced by S. By n(G) = |V(G) | and δ(G) we denote the order and the minimum degree of G, respectively. Let k be a positive integer. A subset S ⊆ V(G) is a connected global offensive k-alliance of the connected graph G, if G[S] is connected and |N(v) ∩ S | ≥ |N(v) -S | + k for every vertex v ∈ V(G) -S, where N(v) is the neighborhood of v. The connected global offensive k-alliance number is the...
An odd dominating set of a simple, undirected graph G = (V,E) is a set of vertices D ⊆ V such that |N[v] ∩ D| ≡ 1 mod 2 for all vertices v ∈ V. It is known that every graph has an odd dominating set. In this paper we consider the concept of connected odd dominating sets. We prove that the problem of deciding if a graph has a connected odd dominating set is NP-complete. We also determine the existence or non-existence of such sets in several classes of graphs. Among other results, we prove there...
For a vertex v of a connected graph G and a subset S of V(G), the distance between v and S is d(v,S) = mind(v,x)|x ∈ S. For an ordered k-partition Π = S₁,S₂,...,Sₖ of V(G), the representation of v with respect to Π is the k-vector r(v|Π) = (d(v,S₁), d(v,S₂),..., d(v,Sₖ)). The k-partition Π is a resolving partition if the k-vectors r(v|Π), v ∈ V(G), are distinct. The minimum k for which there is a resolving k-partition of V(G) is the partition dimension pd(G) of G. A resolving partition Π = S₁,S₂,...,Sₖ...
For an ordered set of vertices and a vertex in a connected graph , the representation of with respect to is the -vector = (, , where represents the distance between the vertices and . The set is a resolving set for if distinct vertices of have distinct representations with respect to . A resolving set for containing a minimum number of vertices is a basis for . The dimension is the number of vertices in a basis for . A resolving set of is connected if the subgraph...
For an ordered -decomposition of a connected graph and an edge of , the -code of is the -tuple = (
We prove a necessary and sufficient condition under which a connected graph has a connected P₃-path graph. Moreover, an analogous condition for connectivity of the Pₖ-path graph of a connected graph which does not contain a cycle of length smaller than k+1 is derived.
Currently displaying 421 –
440 of
663