The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

Page 1

Displaying 1 – 4 of 4

Showing per page

Lipschitz stability in the determination of the principal part of a parabolic equation

Ganghua Yuan, Masahiro Yamamoto (2009)

ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations

Let y ( h ) ( t , x ) be one solution to t y ( t , x ) - i , j = 1 n j ( a i j ( x ) i y ( t , x ) ) = h ( t , x ) , 0 < t < T , x Ω with a non-homogeneous term h , and y | ( 0 , T ) × Ω = 0 , where Ω n is a bounded domain. We discuss an inverse problem of determining n ( n + 1 ) / 2 unknown functions a i j by { ν y ( h ) | ( 0 , T ) × Γ 0 , y ( h ) ( θ , · ) } 1 0 after selecting input sources h 1 , . . . , h 0 suitably, where Γ 0 is an arbitrary subboundary, ν denotes the normal derivative, 0 < θ < T and 0 . In the case of 0 = ( n + 1 ) 2 n / 2 , we prove the Lipschitz stability in the inverse problem if we choose ( h 1 , . . . , h 0 ) from a set { C 0 ( ( 0 , T ) × ω ) } 0 with an arbitrarily fixed subdomain ω Ω . Moreover we can take 0 = ( n + 3 ) n / 2 by making special choices for h , 1 0 . The proof is...

Lipschitz stability in the determination of the principal part of a parabolic equation

Ganghua Yuan, Masahiro Yamamoto (2008)

ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations

Let y(h)(t,x) be one solution to t y ( t , x ) - i , j = 1 n j ( a i j ( x ) i y ( t , x ) ) = h ( t , x ) , 0 < t < T , x Ω with a non-homogeneous term h, and y | ( 0 , T ) × Ω = 0 , where Ω n is a bounded domain. We discuss an inverse problem of determining n(n+1)/2 unknown functions aij by { ν y ( h ) | ( 0 , T ) × Γ 0 , y ( h ) ( θ , · ) } 1 0 after selecting input sources h 1 , . . . , h 0 suitably, where Γ 0 is an arbitrary subboundary, ν denotes the normal derivative, 0 < θ < T and 0 . In the case of 0 = ( n + 1 ) 2 n / 2 , we prove the Lipschitz stability in the inverse problem if we choose ( h 1 , . . . , h 0 ) from a set { C 0 ( ( 0 , T ) × ω ) } 0 with an arbitrarily fixed subdomain ω Ω . Moreover we can take 0 = ( n + 3 ) n / 2 by making special choices for...

Currently displaying 1 – 4 of 4

Page 1