Doubly commuting operator representations of Dirichlet algebras
In this note we establish a vector-valued version of Beurling’s theorem (the Lax-Halmos theorem) for the polydisc. As an application of the main result, we provide necessary and sufficient conditions for the “weak” completion problem in .
We study representations of Banach algebras on reflexive Banach spaces. Algebras which admit such representations which are bounded below seem to be a good generalisation of Arens regular Banach algebras; this class includes dual Banach algebras as defined by Runde, but also all group algebras, and all discrete (weakly cancellative) semigroup algebras. Such algebras also behave in a similar way to C*- and W*-algebras; we show that interpolation space techniques can be used in place of GNS type arguments....
In this paper we establish a dual weak convergence theorem for the Ishikawa iteration process for nonexpansive mappings in a reflexive and strictly convex Banach space with a uniformly Gâteaux differentiable norm, and then apply this result to study the problem of the weak convergence of the iteration process.
We determine the duals of the homogeneous matrix-weighted Besov spaces and which were previously defined in [5]. If W is a matrix weight, then the dual of can be identified with and, similarly, . Moreover, for certain W which may not be in the class, the duals of and are determined and expressed in terms of the Besov spaces and , which we define in terms of reducing operators associated with W. We also develop the basic theory of these reducing operator Besov spaces. Similar...
Let be a Banach operator ideal. Based on the notion of -compactness in a Banach space due to Carl and Stephani, we deal with the notion of measure of non–compactness of an operator. We consider a map (respectively, ) acting on the operators of the surjective (respectively, injective) hull of such that (respectively, ) if and only if the operator T is -compact (respectively, injectively -compact). Under certain conditions on the ideal , we prove an equivalence inequality involving and ....