The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

Displaying similar documents to “The Roquette category of finite p -groups”

On category 𝒪 for cyclotomic rational Cherednik algebras

Iain G. Gordon, Ivan Losev (2014)

Journal of the European Mathematical Society

Similarity:

We study equivalences for category 𝒪 p of the rational Cherednik algebras 𝐇 p of type G ( n ) = ( μ ) n 𝔖 n : a highest weight equivalence between 𝒪 p and 𝒪 σ ( p ) for σ 𝔖 and an action of 𝔖 on an explicit non-empty Zariski open set of parameters p ; a derived equivalence between 𝒪 p and 𝒪 p ' whenever p and p ' have integral difference; a highest weight equivalence between 𝒪 p and a parabolic category 𝒪 for the general linear group, under a non-rationality assumption on the parameter p . As a consequence, we confirm special cases...

Stable tubes in extriangulated categories

Li Wang, Jiaqun Wei, Haicheng Zhang (2022)

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal

Similarity:

Let 𝒳 be a semibrick in an extriangulated category. If 𝒳 is a τ -semibrick, then the Auslander-Reiten quiver Γ ( ( 𝒳 ) ) of the filtration subcategory ( 𝒳 ) generated by 𝒳 is 𝔸 . If 𝒳 = { X i } i = 1 t is a τ -cycle semibrick, then Γ ( ( 𝒳 ) ) is 𝔸 / τ 𝔸 t .

A note on infinite a S -groups

Reza Nikandish, Babak Miraftab (2015)

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal

Similarity:

Let G be a group. If every nontrivial subgroup of G has a proper supplement, then G is called an a S -group. We study some properties of a S -groups. For instance, it is shown that a nilpotent group G is an a S -group if and only if G is a subdirect product of cyclic groups of prime orders. We prove that if G is an a S -group which satisfies the descending chain condition on subgroups, then G is finite. Among other results, we characterize all abelian groups for which every nontrivial quotient group...

Cotorsion pairs in comma categories

Yuan Yuan, Jian He, Dejun Wu (2024)

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal

Similarity:

Let 𝒜 and be abelian categories with enough projective and injective objects, and T : 𝒜 a left exact additive functor. Then one has a comma category ( T ) . It is shown that if T : 𝒜 is 𝒳 -exact, then ( 𝒳 , 𝒳 ) is a (hereditary) cotorsion pair in 𝒜 and ( 𝒴 , 𝒴 ) ) is a (hereditary) cotorsion pair in if and only if 𝒳 𝒴 , 𝐡 ( 𝒳 , 𝒴 ) ) is a (hereditary) cotorsion pair in ( T ) and 𝒳 and 𝒴 are closed under extensions. Furthermore, we characterize when special preenveloping classes in abelian categories 𝒜 and can induce special preenveloping...

On almost complex structures from classical linear connections

Jan Kurek, Włodzimierz M. Mikulski (2017)

Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska, sectio A – Mathematica

Similarity:

Let f m be the category of m -dimensional manifolds and local diffeomorphisms and  let T be the tangent functor on f m . Let 𝒱 be the category of real vector spaces and linear maps and let 𝒱 m be the category of m -dimensional real vector spaces and linear isomorphisms. We characterize all regular covariant functors F : 𝒱 m 𝒱 admitting f m -natural operators J ˜ transforming classical linear connections on m -dimensional manifolds M into almost complex structures J ˜ ( ) on F ( T ) M = x M F ( T x M ) .

The Ribes-Zalesskii property of some one relator groups

Gilbert Mantika, Narcisse Temate-Tangang, Daniel Tieudjo (2022)

Archivum Mathematicum

Similarity:

The profinite topology on any abstract group G , is one such that the fundamental system of neighborhoods of the identity is given by all its subgroups of finite index. We say that a group G has the Ribes-Zalesskii property of rank k , or is RZ k with k a natural number, if any product H 1 H 2 H k of finitely generated subgroups H 1 , H 2 , , H k is closed in the profinite topology on G . And a group is said to have the Ribes-Zalesskii property or is RZ if it is RZ k for any natural number k . In this paper we characterize...

Finite groups whose all proper subgroups are 𝒞 -groups

Pengfei Guo, Jianjun Liu (2018)

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal

Similarity:

A group G is said to be a 𝒞 -group if for every divisor d of the order of G , there exists a subgroup H of G of order d such that H is normal or abnormal in G . We give a complete classification of those groups which are not 𝒞 -groups but all of whose proper subgroups are 𝒞 -groups.

Recognizability of finite groups by Suzuki group

Alireza Khalili Asboei, Seyed Sadegh Salehi Amiri (2019)

Archivum Mathematicum

Similarity:

Let G be a finite group. The main supergraph 𝒮 ( G ) is a graph with vertex set G in which two vertices x and y are adjacent if and only if o ( x ) o ( y ) or o ( y ) o ( x ) . In this paper, we will show that G S z ( q ) if and only if 𝒮 ( G ) 𝒮 ( S z ( q ) ) , where q = 2 2 m + 1 8 .

Several quantitative characterizations of some specific groups

A. Mohammadzadeh, Ali Reza Moghaddamfar (2017)

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

Similarity:

Let G be a finite group and let π ( G ) = { p 1 , p 2 , ... , p k } be the set of prime divisors of | G | for which p 1 < p 2 < < p k . The Gruenberg-Kegel graph of G , denoted GK ( G ) , is defined as follows: its vertex set is π ( G ) and two different vertices p i and p j are adjacent by an edge if and only if G contains an element of order p i p j . The degree of a vertex p i in GK ( G ) is denoted by d G ( p i ) and the k -tuple D ( G ) = ( d G ( p 1 ) , d G ( p 2 ) , ... , d G ( p k ) ) is said to be the degree pattern of G . Moreover, if ω π ( G ) is the vertex set of a connected component of GK ( G ) , then the largest ω -number which divides | G | , is...

Limits and colimits in certain categories of spaces of continuous functions

Marvin W. Grossman

Similarity:

CONTENTSIntroduction................................................................................................................................................................................5§ 1. Notation and preliminaries.............................................................................................................................................6§ 2. Epimorphisms and monomorphisms.........................................................................................................................7§...