Previous Page 5

Displaying 81 – 96 of 96

Showing per page

More on cardinal invariants of analytic P -ideals

Barnabás Farkas, Lajos Soukup (2009)

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

Given an ideal on ω let 𝔞 ( ) ( 𝔞 ¯ ( ) ) be minimum of the cardinalities of infinite (uncountable) maximal -almost disjoint subsets of [ ω ] ω . We show that 𝔞 ( h ) > ω if h is a summable ideal; but 𝔞 ( 𝒵 μ ) = ω for any tall density ideal 𝒵 μ including the density zero ideal 𝒵 . On the other hand, you have 𝔟 𝔞 ¯ ( ) for any analytic P -ideal , and 𝔞 ¯ ( 𝒵 μ ) 𝔞 for each density ideal 𝒵 μ . For each ideal on ω denote 𝔟 and 𝔡 the unbounding and dominating numbers of ω ω , where f g iff { n ω : f ( n ) > g ( n ) } . We show that 𝔟 = 𝔟 and 𝔡 = 𝔡 for each analytic P -ideal . Given a Borel ideal on...

More on the Ehrenfeucht-Fraisse game of length ω₁

Tapani Hyttinen, Saharon Shelah, Jouko Vaananen (2002)

Fundamenta Mathematicae

By results of [9] there are models and for which the Ehrenfeucht-Fraïssé game of length ω₁, E F G ω ( , ) , is non-determined, but it is consistent relative to the consistency of a measurable cardinal that no such models have cardinality ≤ ℵ₂. We now improve the work of [9] in two ways. Firstly, we prove that the consistency strength of the statement “CH and E F G ω ( , ) is determined for all models and of cardinality ℵ₂” is that of a weakly compact cardinal. On the other hand, we show that if 2 < 2 , T is a countable complete...

More on tie-points and homeomorphism in ℕ*

Alan Dow, Saharon Shelah (2009)

Fundamenta Mathematicae

A point x is a (bow) tie-point of a space X if X∖x can be partitioned into (relatively) clopen sets each with x in its closure. We denote this as X = A x B where A, B are the closed sets which have a unique common accumulation point x. Tie-points have appeared in the construction of non-trivial autohomeomorphisms of βℕ = ℕ* (by Veličković and Shelah Steprans) and in the recent study (by Levy and Dow Techanie) of precisely 2-to-1 maps on ℕ*. In these cases the tie-points have been the unique fixed point...

More remarks on the intersection ideal 𝒩

Tomasz Weiss (2018)

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

We prove in ZFC that every 𝒩 additive set is 𝒩 additive, thus we solve Problem 20 from paper [Weiss T., A note on the intersection ideal 𝒩 , Comment. Math. Univ. Carolin. 54 (2013), no. 3, 437-445] in the negative.

More results in polychromatic Ramsey theory

Uri Abraham, James Cummings (2012)

Open Mathematics

We study polychromatic Ramsey theory with a focus on colourings of [ω 2]2. We show that in the absence of GCH there is a wide range of possibilities. In particular each of the following is consistent relative to the consistency of ZFC: (1) 2ω = ω 2 and ω 2 p o l y ( α ) 0 - b d d 2 for every α <ω 2; (2) 2ω = ω 2 and ω 2 p o l y ( ω 1 ) 2 - b d d 2 .

More set-theory around the weak Freese–Nation property

Sakaé Fuchino, Lajos Soukup (1997)

Fundamenta Mathematicae

We introduce a very weak version of the square principle which may hold even under failure of the generalized continuum hypothesis. Under this weak square principle, we give a new characterization (Theorem 10) of partial orderings with κ-Freese-Nation property (see below for the definition). The characterization is not a ZFC theorem: assuming Chang’s Conjecture for ω , we can find a counter-example to the characterization (Theorem 12). We then show that, in the model obtained by adding Cohen reals,...

Multiple gaps

Antonio Avilés, Stevo Todorcevic (2011)

Fundamenta Mathematicae

We study a higher-dimensional version of the standard notion of a gap formed by a finite sequence of ideals of the quotient algebra 𝓟(ω)/fin. We examine different types of such objects found in 𝓟(ω)/fin both from the combinatorial and the descriptive set-theoretic side.

Multiplication of nonadditive cuts in AST

Karel Čuda (1991)

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

Three complete characteristics of couples of nonadditive cuts such that J × K ̲ J t i m e s K ¯ are given. The equality J × K ¯ = J ! K is proved for all couples of nonadditive cuts. Some examples of nonadditive cuts are described.

Currently displaying 81 – 96 of 96

Previous Page 5