Displaying 61 – 80 of 196

Showing per page

The Lindelöf property and pseudo- 1 -compactness in spaces and topological groups

Constancio Hernández, Mihail G. Tkachenko (2008)

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

We introduce and study, following Z. Frol’ık, the class ( 𝒫 ) of regular P -spaces X such that the product X × Y is pseudo- 1 -compact, for every regular pseudo- 1 -compact P -space Y . We show that every pseudo- 1 -compact space which is locally ( 𝒫 ) is in ( 𝒫 ) and that every regular Lindelöf P -space belongs to ( 𝒫 ) . It is also proved that all pseudo- 1 -compact P -groups are in ( 𝒫 ) . The problem of characterization of subgroups of -factorizable (equivalently, pseudo- 1 -compact) P -groups is considered as well. We give some necessary...

The nonexistence of expansive homeomorphisms of chainable continua

Hisao Kato (1996)

Fundamenta Mathematicae

A homeomorphism f:X → X of a compactum X with metric d is expansive if there is c > 0 such that if x, y ∈ X and x ≠ y, then there is an integer n ∈ ℤ such that d ( f n ( x ) , f n ( y ) ) > c . In this paper, we prove that if a homeomorphism f:X → X of a continuum X can be lifted to an onto map h:P → P of the pseudo-arc P, then f is not expansive. As a corollary, we prove that there are no expansive homeomorphisms on chainable continua. This is an affirmative answer to one of Williams’ conjectures.

The nonexistence of universal metric flows

Stefan Geschke (2018)

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

We consider dynamical systems of the form ( X , f ) where X is a compact metric space and f : X X is either a continuous map or a homeomorphism and provide a new proof that there is no universal metric dynamical system of this kind. The same is true for metric minimal dynamical systems and for metric abstract ω -limit sets, answering a question by Will Brian.

The omega limit sets of subsets in a metric space

Changming Ding (2005)

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal

In this paper, we discuss the properties of limit sets of subsets and attractors in a compact metric space. It is shown that the ω -limit set ω ( Y ) of Y is the limit point of the sequence { ( C l Y ) · [ i , ) } i = 1 in 2 X and also a quasi-attractor is the limit point of attractors with respect to the Hausdorff metric. It is shown that if a component of an attractor is not an attractor, then it must be a real quasi-attractor.

Currently displaying 61 – 80 of 196