Higher order differentiability of nonlinear operators on normed spaces. II.
The aim of this paper is to extend the study of Riesz transforms associated to Dunkl Ornstein-Uhlenbeck operator considered by A. Nowak, L. Roncal and K. Stempak to higher order.
In this article, we shall extend the formalization of [10] to discuss higher-order partial differentiation of real valued functions. The linearity of this operator is also proved (refer to [10], [12] and [13] for partial differentiation).
In this paper we consider a class of Hankel operators with operator valued symbols on the Hardy space where is a separable infinite dimensional Hilbert space and showed that these operators are unitarily equivalent to a class of integral operators in We then obtained a generalization of Hilbert inequality for vector valued functions. In the continuous case the corresponding integral operator has matrix valued kernels and in the discrete case the sum involves inner product of vectors in the...
It is an open question whether every Fourier type 2 operator factors through a Hilbert space. We show that at least the natural gradations of Fourier type 2 norms and Hilbert space factorization norms are not uniformly equivalent. A corresponding result is also obtained for a number of other sequences of ideal norms instead of the Fourier type 2 gradation including the Walsh function analogue of Fourier type. Our main tools are ideal norms and random matrices.
The irreducible Hilbert space representations of a ⁎-algebra, the graded analogue of the Lie algebra of the group of plane motions, are classified up to unitary equivalence.
In this paper, several sufficient conditions for boundedness of the Hilbert transform between two weighted Lp-spaces are obtained. Invariant A∞ weights are obtained. Several characterizations of invariant A∞ weights are given. We also obtain some sufficient conditions for products of two Toeplitz operators of Hankel operators to be bounded on the Hardy space of the unit circle using Orlicz spaces and Lorentz spaces.
On complete pseudoconvex Reinhardt domains in , we show that there is no nonzero Hankel operator with anti-holomorphic symbol that is Hilbert-Schmidt. In the proof, we explicitly use the pseudoconvexity property of the domain. We also present two examples of unbounded non-pseudoconvex domains in that admit nonzero Hilbert-Schmidt Hankel operators with anti-holomorphic symbols. In the first example the Bergman space is finite dimensional. However, in the second example the Bergman space is infinite...
We consider a class of unbounded nonhyperbolic complete Reinhardt domains where , , are positive real numbers and , are positive integers. We show that if a Hankel operator with anti-holomorphic symbol is Hilbert-Schmidt on the Bergman space , then it must be zero. This gives an example of high dimensional unbounded complete Reinhardt domain that does not admit nonzero Hilbert-Schmidt Hankel operators with anti-holomorphic symbols.
A Hille-Yosida Theorem is proved on convenient vector spaces, a class, which contains all sequentially complete locally convex spaces. The approach is governed by convenient analysis and the credo that many reasonable questions concerning strongly continuous semigroups can be proved on the subspace of smooth vectors. Examples from literature are reconsidered by these simpler methods and some applications to the theory of infinite dimensional heat equations are given.
Motivated by a great deal of interest recently in operators that may not be densely defined, we deal with regularized semigroups and integrated semigroups that are either not exponentially bounded or not defined on [0,∞) and generated by closed operators which may not be densely defined. Some characterizations and related examples are presented. Our results are extensions of the corresponding results produced by other authors.
This paper is concerned with the Hölder regularity of viscosity solutions of second-order, fully non-linear elliptic integro-differential equations. Our results rely on two key ingredients: first we assume that, at each point of the domain, either the equation is strictly elliptic in the classical fully non-linear sense, or (and this is the most original part of our work) the equation is strictly elliptic in a non-local non-linear sense we make precise. Next we impose some regularity and growth...