Displaying similar documents to “On the adjacent eccentric distance sum of graphs”

On double domination in graphs

Jochen Harant, Michael A. Henning (2005)

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory

Similarity:

In a graph G, a vertex dominates itself and its neighbors. A subset S ⊆ V(G) is a double dominating set of G if S dominates every vertex of G at least twice. The minimum cardinality of a double dominating set of G is the double domination number γ × 2 ( G ) . A function f(p) is defined, and it is shown that γ × 2 ( G ) = m i n f ( p ) , where the minimum is taken over the n-dimensional cube C = p = ( p , . . . , p ) | p i I R , 0 p i 1 , i = 1 , . . . , n . Using this result, it is then shown that if G has order n with minimum degree δ and average degree d, then γ × 2 ( G ) ( ( l n ( 1 + d ) + l n δ + 1 ) / δ ) n .

On locating-domination in graphs

Mustapha Chellali, Malika Mimouni, Peter J. Slater (2010)

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory

Similarity:

A set D of vertices in a graph G = (V,E) is a locating-dominating set (LDS) if for every two vertices u,v of V-D the sets N(u)∩ D and N(v)∩ D are non-empty and different. The locating-domination number γ L ( G ) is the minimum cardinality of a LDS of G, and the upper locating-domination number, Γ L ( G ) is the maximum cardinality of a minimal LDS of G. We present different bounds on Γ L ( G ) and γ L ( G ) .

Edit distance measure for graphs

Tomasz Dzido, Krzysztof Krzywdziński (2015)

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal

Similarity:

In this paper, we investigate a measure of similarity of graphs similar to the Ramsey number. We present values and bounds for g ( n , l ) , the biggest number k guaranteeing that there exist l graphs on n vertices, each two having edit distance at least k . By edit distance of two graphs G , F we mean the number of edges needed to be added to or deleted from graph G to obtain graph F . This new extremal number g ( n , l ) is closely linked to the edit distance of graphs. Using probabilistic methods we show...

Distance independence in graphs

J. Louis Sewell, Peter J. Slater (2011)

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory

Similarity:

For a set D of positive integers, we define a vertex set S ⊆ V(G) to be D-independent if u, v ∈ S implies the distance d(u,v) ∉ D. The D-independence number β D ( G ) is the maximum cardinality of a D-independent set. In particular, the independence number β ( G ) = β 1 ( G ) . Along with general results we consider, in particular, the odd-independence number β O D D ( G ) where ODD = 1,3,5,....

Some properties of generalized distance eigenvalues of graphs

Yuzheng Ma, Yan Ling Shao (2024)

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal

Similarity:

Let G be a simple connected graph with vertex set V ( G ) = { v 1 , v 2 , , v n } and edge set E ( G ) , and let d v i be the degree of the vertex v i . Let D ( G ) be the distance matrix and let T r ( G ) be the diagonal matrix of the vertex transmissions of G . The generalized distance matrix of G is defined as D α ( G ) = α T r ( G ) + ( 1 - α ) D ( G ) , where 0 α 1 . Let λ 1 ( D α ( G ) ) λ 2 ( D α ( G ) ) ... λ n ( D α ( G ) ) be the generalized distance eigenvalues of G , and let k be an integer with 1 k n . We denote by S k ( D α ( G ) ) = λ 1 ( D α ( G ) ) + λ 2 ( D α ( G ) ) + ... + λ k ( D α ( G ) ) the sum of the k largest generalized distance eigenvalues. The generalized distance spread of a graph G is defined as D α S ( G ) = λ 1 ( D α ( G ) ) - λ n ( D α ( G ) ) ....

The Turán number of the graph 3 P 4

Halina Bielak, Sebastian Kieliszek (2014)

Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska, sectio A – Mathematica

Similarity:

Let e x ( n , G ) denote the maximum number of edges in a graph on n vertices which does not contain G as a subgraph. Let P i denote a path consisting of i vertices and let m P i denote m disjoint copies of P i . In this paper we count e x ( n , 3 P 4 ) .

On path-quasar Ramsey numbers

Binlong Li, Bo Ning (2014)

Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska, sectio A – Mathematica

Similarity:

Let G 1 and G 2 be two given graphs. The Ramsey number R ( G 1 , G 2 ) is the least integer r such that for every graph G on r vertices, either G contains a G 1 or G ¯ contains a G 2 . Parsons gave a recursive formula to determine the values of R ( P n , K 1 , m ) , where P n is a path on n vertices and K 1 , m is a star on m + 1 vertices. In this note, we study the Ramsey numbers R ( P n , K 1 F m ) , where F m is a linear forest on m vertices. We determine the exact values of R ( P n , K 1 F m ) for the cases m n and m 2 n , and for the case that F m has no odd component. Moreover, we...

Several quantitative characterizations of some specific groups

A. Mohammadzadeh, Ali Reza Moghaddamfar (2017)

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

Similarity:

Let G be a finite group and let π ( G ) = { p 1 , p 2 , ... , p k } be the set of prime divisors of | G | for which p 1 < p 2 < < p k . The Gruenberg-Kegel graph of G , denoted GK ( G ) , is defined as follows: its vertex set is π ( G ) and two different vertices p i and p j are adjacent by an edge if and only if G contains an element of order p i p j . The degree of a vertex p i in GK ( G ) is denoted by d G ( p i ) and the k -tuple D ( G ) = ( d G ( p 1 ) , d G ( p 2 ) , ... , d G ( p k ) ) is said to be the degree pattern of G . Moreover, if ω π ( G ) is the vertex set of a connected component of GK ( G ) , then the largest ω -number which divides | G | , is...

On the bounds of Laplacian eigenvalues of k -connected graphs

Xiaodan Chen, Yaoping Hou (2015)

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal

Similarity:

Let μ n - 1 ( G ) be the algebraic connectivity, and let μ 1 ( G ) be the Laplacian spectral radius of a k -connected graph G with n vertices and m edges. In this paper, we prove that μ n - 1 ( G ) 2 n k 2 ( n ( n - 1 ) - 2 m ) ( n + k - 2 ) + 2 k 2 , with equality if and only if G is the complete graph K n or K n - e . Moreover, if G is non-regular, then μ 1 ( G ) < 2 Δ - 2 ( n Δ - 2 m ) k 2 2 ( n Δ - 2 m ) ( n 2 - 2 n + 2 k ) + n k 2 , where Δ stands for the maximum degree of G . Remark that in some cases, these two inequalities improve some previously known results.

Full domination in graphs

Robert C. Brigham, Gary Chartrand, Ronald D. Dutton, Ping Zhang (2001)

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory

Similarity:

For each vertex v in a graph G, let there be associated a subgraph H v of G. The vertex v is said to dominate H v as well as dominate each vertex and edge of H v . A set S of vertices of G is called a full dominating set if every vertex of G is dominated by some vertex of S, as is every edge of G. The minimum cardinality of a full dominating set of G is its full domination number γ F H ( G ) . A full dominating set of G of cardinality γ F H ( G ) is called a γ F H -set of G. We study three types of full domination in...

A spectral bound for graph irregularity

Felix Goldberg (2015)

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal

Similarity:

The imbalance of an edge e = { u , v } in a graph is defined as i ( e ) = | d ( u ) - d ( v ) | , where d ( · ) is the vertex degree. The irregularity I ( G ) of G is then defined as the sum of imbalances over all edges of G . This concept was introduced by Albertson who proved that I ( G ) 4 n 3 / 27 (where n = | V ( G ) | ) and obtained stronger bounds for bipartite and triangle-free graphs. Since then a number of additional bounds were given by various authors. In this paper we prove a new upper bound, which improves a bound found by Zhou and Luo in 2008. Our bound involves...

On γ-labelings of trees

Gary Chartrand, David Erwin, Donald W. VanderJagt, Ping Zhang (2005)

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory

Similarity:

Let G be a graph of order n and size m. A γ-labeling of G is a one-to-one function f:V(G) → 0,1,2,...,m that induces a labeling f’: E(G) → 1,2,...,m of the edges of G defined by f’(e) = |f(u)-f(v)| for each edge e = uv of G. The value of a γ-labeling f is v a l ( f ) = Σ e E ( G ) f ' K ( e ) . The maximum value of a γ-labeling of G is defined as v a l m a x ( G ) = m a x v a l ( f ) : f i s a γ - l a b e l i n g o f G ; while the minimum value of a γ-labeling of G is v a l m i n ( G ) = m i n v a l ( f ) : f i s a γ - l a b e l i n g o f G ; The values v a l m a x ( S p , q ) and v a l m i n ( S p , q ) are determined for double stars S p , q . We present characterizations of connected graphs G of order n for which...

The real symmetric matrices of odd order with a P-set of maximum size

Zhibin Du, Carlos M. da Fonseca (2016)

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal

Similarity:

Suppose that A is a real symmetric matrix of order n . Denote by m A ( 0 ) the nullity of A . For a nonempty subset α of { 1 , 2 , ... , n } , let A ( α ) be the principal submatrix of A obtained from A by deleting the rows and columns indexed by α . When m A ( α ) ( 0 ) = m A ( 0 ) + | α | , we call α a P-set of A . It is known that every P-set of A contains at most n / 2 elements. The graphs of even order for which one can find a matrix attaining this bound are now completely characterized. However, the odd case turned out to be more difficult to tackle. As...

2-factors in claw-free graphs with locally disconnected vertices

Mingqiang An, Liming Xiong, Runli Tian (2015)

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal

Similarity:

An edge of G is singular if it does not lie on any triangle of G ; otherwise, it is non-singular. A vertex u of a graph G is called locally connected if the induced subgraph G [ N ( u ) ] by its neighborhood is connected; otherwise, it is called locally disconnected. In this paper, we prove that if a connected claw-free graph G of order at least three satisfies the following two conditions: (i) for each locally disconnected vertex v of degree at least 3 in G , there is a nonnegative integer s such...