Let [...] f(z)=∑n=0∞αnzn $f\left(z\right)={\sum }_{n=0}^{\infty }{\alpha }_n{z}^n$ be a function defined by power series with complex coefficients and convergent on the open disk D (0, R) ⊂ ℂ, R > 0. For any x, y ∈ ℬ, a Banach algebra, with ‖x‖, ‖y‖ < R we show among others that [...] ‖f(y)−f(x)‖≤‖y−x‖∫01fa′(‖(1−t)x+ty‖)dt $$∥f\left(y\right)-f\left(x\right)∥\le ∥y-x∥{\int }_0^1{f}_a^{\text{'}}\left(∥(1-t)x+ty∥\right)dt$$ where [...] fa(z)=∑n=0∞|αn| zn $f_a\left(z\right)={\sum }_{n=0}^{\infty }|{\alpha }_n|z^n$ . Inequalities for the commutator such as [...] ‖f(x)f(y)−f(y)f(x)‖≤2fa(M)fa′(M)‖y−x‖, $$∥f\left(x\right)f\left(y\right)-f\left(y\right)f\left(x\right)∥\le 2f_a\left(M\right)f_a^{\text{'}}\left(M\right)∥y-x∥,$$ if ‖x‖, ‖y‖ ≤ M < R, as well as some inequalities of Hermite–Hadamard type are also provided. ...

Some Ostrowski’s type inequalities for the Riemann-Stieltjes integral ${\int }_a^{b}f\left(e^{it}\right)du\left(t\right)$ of continuous complex valued integrands $f:𝒞\left(0,1\right)\to ℂ$ defined on the complex unit circle $𝒞\left(0,1\right)$ and various subclasses of integrators $u:\left[a,b\right]\subseteq \left[0,2\pi \right]\to ℂ$ of bounded variation are given. Natural applications for functions of unitary operators in Hilbert spaces are provided as well.

Let $f$ be a continuous function on $I$ and $A$, $B\in {\mathrm{𝒮𝒜}}_I\left(H\right)$, the convex set of selfadjoint operators with spectra in $I$. If $A\ne B$ and $f$, as an operator function, is Gateaux differentiable on $$[A,B]:=\left\{(1-t)A+tB\mid t\in \left[0,1\right]\right\},$$ while $p:\left[0,1\right]\to ℝ$ is Lebesgue integrable, then we have the inequalities $$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill \parallel {\int }_0^{1}p\left(\tau \right)& f\left(\left(1-\tau \right)A+\tau B\right)d\tau -{\int }_0^{1}p\left(\tau \right)d\tau {\int }_0^{1}f\left(\left(1-\tau \right)A+\tau B\right)d\tau \parallel \hfill \\ & \le {\int }_0^1\tau (1-\tau )|\frac{{\int }_{\tau }^{1}p\left(s\right)ds}{1-\tau }-\frac{{\int }_0^{\tau }p\left(s\right)ds}{\tau }|∥\nabla f_{\left(1-\tau \right)A+\tau B}\left(B-A\right)∥d\tau \hfill \\ & \le \frac{1}{4}{\int }_0^1|\frac{{\int }_{\tau }^{1}p\left(s\right)ds}{1-\tau }-\frac{{\int }_0^{\tau }p\left(s\right)ds}{\tau }|∥\nabla f_{\left(1-\tau \right)A+\tau B}\left(B-A\right)∥d\tau ,\hfill \end{array}$$ where $\nabla f$ is the Gateaux derivative of $f$.

The numerical minimization of the functional $\mathcal{F}\left(u\right)={\int }_{\mathrm{\Omega }}\varphi \left(x,{\nu }_u\right)\left|Du\right|+{\int }_{\partial \mathrm{\Omega }}\mu ud{\mathcal{H}}^{n-1}-{\int }_{\mathrm{\Omega }}\kappa udx$, $u\in BV\left(\mathrm{\Omega };\left\{-1,1\right\}\right)$ is addressed. The function $\varphi$ is continuous, has linear growth, and is convex and positively homogeneous of degree one in the second variable. We prove that $\mathcal{F}$ can be equivalently minimized on the convex set $BV\left(\mathrm{\Omega };\left[-1,1\right]\right)$ and then regularized with a sequence ${\left\{{\mathcal{F}}_{ϵ}\left(u\right)\right\}}_{ϵ}$, of stricdy convex functionals defined on $BV\left(\mathrm{\Omega };\left[-1,1\right]\right)$. Then both $\mathcal{F}$ and ${\mathcal{F}}_{ϵ}$, can be discretized by continuous linear finite elements. The convexity property of the functionals on $BV\left(\mathrm{\Omega };\left[-1,1\right]\right)$ is useful in the numerical...

Suppose that in a ballot candidate $A$ scores $a$ votes and candidate $B$ scores $b$ votes and that all possible $\left(a+ba\right)$ voting sequences are equally probable. Denote by ${\alpha }_r$ and by ${\beta }_r$ the number of votes registered for $A$ and for $B$, respectively, among the first $r$ votes recorded, $r=1,\cdots ,a+b$. The purpose of this paper is to derive, for $a\ge b-c$, the probability distributions of the random variables defined as the number of subscripts $r=1,\cdots ,a+b$ for which (i) ${\alpha }_r={\beta }_r-c$, (ii) ${\alpha }_r={\beta }_r-c$ but ${\alpha }_{r-1}={\beta }_{r-1}-c\pm 1$, (iii) ${\alpha }_r={\beta }_r-c$ but ${\alpha }_{r-1}={\beta }_{r-1}-c\pm 1$ and ${\alpha }_{r+1}={\beta }_{r+1}-c\pm 1$, where $c=0,\pm 1,\pm 2,\cdots$.

For paths Pₙ, G. Chartrand, L. Nebeský and P. Zhang showed that $a{c}^{\text{'}}\left(Pₙ\right)\le \left(\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{n-2}{2}\right)+2$ for every positive integer n, where ac’(Pₙ) denotes the nearly antipodal chromatic number of Pₙ. In this paper we show that $a{c}^{\text{'}}\left(Pₙ\right)\le \left(\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{n-2}{2}\right)-n/2-⎣10/n⎦+7$ if n is even positive integer and n ≥ 10, and $a{c}^{\text{'}}\left(Pₙ\right)\le \left(\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{n-2}{2}\right)-(n-1)/2-⎣13/n⎦+8$ if n is odd positive integer and n ≥ 13. For all even positive integers n ≥ 10 and all odd positive integers n ≥ 13, these results improve the upper bounds for nearly antipodal chromatic number of Pₙ.

The scope of this note is a self-contained presentation of a mathematical method that enables us to give an absolute upper bound for the difference of the Gini coefficients $$\left|G({\sigma }_1,\cdots ,{\sigma }_n)-G({\gamma }_1,\cdots ,{\gamma }_n)\right|,$$ where $({\gamma }_1,\cdots ,{\gamma }_n)$ represents the vector of the gross wages and $({\sigma }_1,\cdots ,{\sigma }_n)$ represents the vector of the corresponding super-gross wages that is used in the Czech Republic for calculating the net wage. Since (as of June 2019) ${\sigma }_i=100·⌈1.34{\gamma }_i/100⌉$, the study of the above difference seems to be somewhat inaccessible for many economists. However, our estimate...

For positive integers $n$, Euler’s phi function and Dedekind’s psi function are given by $$\phi \left(n\right)=n\prod _{\begin{array}{c}p\mid n\\ p\mathrm{prime}\end{array}}\left(1-\frac{1}{p}\right)\text{and}\psi \left(n\right)=n\prod _{\begin{array}{c}p\mid n\\ p\mathrm{prime}\end{array}}\left(1+\frac{1}{p}\right),$$ respectively. We prove that for all $n\ge 2$ we have $${\left(1-\frac{1}{n}\right)}^{n-1}{\left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)}^{n+1}\le {\left(\frac{\phi \left(n\right)}{n}\right)}^{\phi \left(n\right)}{\left(\frac{\psi \left(n\right)}{n}\right)}^{\psi \left(n\right)}$$ and $${\left(\frac{\phi \left(n\right)}{n}\right)}^{\psi \left(n\right)}{\left(\frac{\psi \left(n\right)}{n}\right)}^{\phi \left(n\right)}\le {\left(1-\frac{1}{n}\right)}^{n+1}{\left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)}^{n-1}.$$ The sign of equality holds if and only if $n$ is a prime. The first inequality refines results due to Atanassov (2011) and Kannan & Srikanth (2013).