Let T be the standard Cantor-Lebesgue function that maps the Cantor space onto the unit interval ⟨0,1⟩. We prove within ZFC that for every , X is meager additive in iff T(X) is meager additive in ⟨0,1⟩. As a consequence, we deduce that the cartesian product of meager additive sets in ℝ remains meager additive in ℝ × ℝ. In this note, we also study the relationship between null additive sets in and ℝ.
The paper deals with a new mathematical model for quantum mechanics based on the fuzzy set theory [1]. The indefinite integral of observables is defined and some basic properties of the integral are examined.
By studying dimensional types of metric scattered spaces, we consider the wider class of metric σ-discrete spaces. Applying techniques relevant to this wider class, we present new proofs of some embeddable properties of countable metric spaces in such a way that they can be generalized onto uncountable metric scattered spaces. Related topics are also explored, which gives a few new results.
The aim of this paper is to study some properties of Michálek’s fuzzy topology which are quite different of the classic properties of the Chang’s topology.
Motivated by the concept of quantifier (in the sense of P. Halmos) on different algebraic structures (Boolean algebras, Heyting algebras, MV-algebras, orthomodular lattices, bounded distributive lattices) and the resulting notion of monadic algebra, the paper introduces the concept of a monadic quantale algebra, considers its properties and provides several representation theorems for the new structures.
We deal with Boolean algebras and their cardinal functions: π-weight π and π-character πχ. We investigate the spectrum of π-weights of subalgebras of a Boolean algebra B. Next we show that the π-character of an ultraproduct of Boolean algebras may be different from the ultraproduct of the π-characters of the factors.
This paper deals with numerical functions J : [0,1] x [0,1] → [0,1] able to functionally express operators →: [0,1]X x [0,1]Y → [0,1]XxY defined as (μ → σ)(x,y) = J(μ(x),σ(y)), and verifying either Modus Ponens or Modus Tollens, or both. The concrete goal of the paper is to search for continuous t-norms T and strong-negation functions N for which it is either T(a, J(a,b)) ≤ b (Modus Ponens) or T(N(b), J(a,b)) ≤ N(a) (Modus Tollens), or both, for all a,b in [0,1] and a given J. Functions J are taken...
Formalization of a part of [11]. Unfortunately, not all is possible to be formalized. Namely, in the paper there is a mistake in the proof of Lemma 3. It states that there exists x ∈ M1 such that M1(x) > N1(x) and (∀y ∈ N1)x ⊀ y. It should be M1(x) ⩾ N1(x). Nevertheless we do not know whether x ∈ N1 or not and cannot prove the contradiction. In the article we referred to [8], [9] and [10].