We study the complexity of the infinite word $u_{\beta }$ associated with the Rényi expansion of $1$ in an irrational base $\beta \>1$. When $\beta$ is the golden ratio, this is the well known Fibonacci word, which is sturmian, and of complexity $ℂ\left(n\right)=n+1$. For $\beta$ such that $d_{\beta }\left(1\right)=t_1{t}_2\cdots t_m$ is finite we provide a simple description of the structure of special factors of the word $u_{\beta }$. When $t_m=1$ we show that $ℂ\left(n\right)=(m-1)n+1$. In the cases when $t_1=t_2=\cdots =t_{m-1}$ or $t_1\>max\{t_2,\cdots ,t_{m-1}\}$ we show that the first difference of the complexity function $ℂ(n+1)-ℂ\left(n\right)$ takes value in $\{m-1,m\}$ for every $n$, and consequently we determine...

We study the complexity of the infinite word uβ associated with the Rényi expansion of 1 in an irrational base β > 1. When β is the golden ratio, this is the well known Fibonacci word, which is Sturmian, and of complexity C(n) = n + 1. For β such that dβ(1) = t1t2...tm is finite we provide a simple description of the structure of special factors of the word uβ. When tm=1 we show that C(n) = (m - 1)n + 1. In the cases when t1 = t2 = ... tm-1or t1 > max{t2,...,tm-1} we show that the first difference of...

We add a sufficient condition for validity of Propo- sition 4.10 in the paper Frougny et al. (2004). This condition is not a necessary one, it is nevertheless convenient, since anyway most of the statements in the paper Frougny et al. (2004) use it.

We add a sufficient condition for validity of Propo- sition 4.10 in the paper Frougny et al. (2004). This condition is not a necessary one, it is nevertheless convenient, since anyway most of the statements in the paper Frougny et al. (2004) use it.