On some problem of A. Rosłanowski
We present a negative answer to problem 3.7(b) posed on page 193 of [2], where, in fact, A. Rosłanowski asked: Does every set of Lebesgue measure zero belong to some Mycielski ideal?
We present a negative answer to problem 3.7(b) posed on page 193 of [2], where, in fact, A. Rosłanowski asked: Does every set of Lebesgue measure zero belong to some Mycielski ideal?
Let (X,d,μ) be a space of homogeneous type. We study the relationship between two types of s-sets: relative to a distance and relative to a measure. We find a condition on a closed subset F of X under which F is an s-set relative to the measure μ if and only if F is an s-set relative to δ. Here δ denotes the quasi-distance defined by Macías and Segovia such that (X,δ,μ) is a normal space. In order to prove this result, we prove a covering type lemma and a type of Hausdorff measure based criterion...
The collection of all sets of measure zero for a finitely additive, group-valued measure is studied and characterised from a combinatorial viewpoint.
In this paper we give an alternative proof of our recent result that totally unrectifiable 1-sets which satisfy a measure-theoretic flatness condition at almost every point and sufficiently small scales, satisfy Besicovitch's 1/2-Conjecture which states that the lower spherical density for totally unrectifiable 1-sets should be bounded above by 1/2 at almost every point. This is in contrast to rectifiable 1-sets which actually possess a density equal to unity at almost every point. Our present method...
Let be a porosity-like relation on a separable locally compact metric space . We show that the -ideal of compact --porous subsets of (under some general conditions on and ) forms a -complete set in the hyperspace of all compact subsets of , in particular it is coanalytic and non-Borel. Our general results are applicable to most interesting types of porosity. It is shown in the cases of the -ideals of -porous sets, --porous sets, -strongly porous sets, -symmetrically porous sets...
Let be the set of all Dirichlet measures on the unit circle. We prove that is a non Borel analytic set for the weak* topology and that is not norm-closed. More precisely, we prove that there is no weak* Borel set which separates from (or even , the set of all measures singular with respect to every measure in . This extends results of Kaufman, Kechris and Lyons about and and gives many examples of non Borel analytic sets.
If an atomlessly measurable cardinal exists, then the class of Lebesgue measurable functions, the class of Borel functions, and the Baire classes of all orders have the difference property. This gives a consistent positive answer to Laczkovich's Problem 2 [Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar. 35 (1980)]. We also give a complete positive answer to Laczkovich's Problem 3 concerning Borel functions with Baire-α differences.
We show that, generally, families of measurable functions do not have the difference property under some assumption. We also show that there are natural classes of functions which do not have the difference property in ZFC. This extends the result of Erdős concerning the family of Lebesgue measurable functions.
The σ-ideal (v 0) is associated with the Silver forcing, see [5]. Also, it constitutes the family of all completely doughnut null sets, see [9]. We introduce segment topologies to state some resemblances of (v 0) to the family of Ramsey null sets. To describe add(v 0) we adopt a proof of Base Matrix Lemma. Consistent results are stated, too. Halbeisen’s conjecture cov(v 0) = add(v 0) is confirmed under the hypothesis t = min{cf(c), r}. The hypothesis cov(v 0) = ω 1 implies that (v 0) has the ideal...
Motivated by the study of planar homoclinic bifurcations, in this paper we describe how the intersection of two middle third Cantor sets changes as the sets are translated across each other. The resulting description shows that the intersection is never empty; in fact, the intersection can be either finite or infinite in size. We show that when the intersection is finite then the number of points in the intersection will be either 2n or 3 · 2n. We also explore the Hausdorff dimension of the intersection...