The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

Displaying 41 – 60 of 199

Showing per page

Sequential + separable vs sequentially separable and another variation on selective separability

Angelo Bella, Maddalena Bonanzinga, Mikhail Matveev (2013)

Open Mathematics

A space X is sequentially separable if there is a countable D ⊂ X such that every point of X is the limit of a sequence of points from D. Neither “sequential + separable” nor “sequentially separable” implies the other. Some examples of this are presented and some conditions under which one of the two implies the other are discussed. A selective version of sequential separability is also considered.

Short proofs of two theorems in topology

Mohammad Ismail, Andrzej Szymański (1993)

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

We present short and elementary proofs of the following two known theorems in General Topology: (i) [H. Wicke and J. Worrell] A T 1 weakly δ θ -refinable countably compact space is compact. (ii) [A. Ostaszewski] A compact Hausdorff space which is a countable union of metrizable spaces is sequential.

Sigma-finiteness and regularity of generalized Radon measures.

J. Fernández Novoa (1990)

Collectanea Mathematica

We extend some known sigma-finiteness and regularity results for (locally finite) Radon measures to locally sigma-finite or locally moderated Radon measures of type (H), and we obtain other new ones. The main result states that the regularity and the sigma-finiteness are equivalent for alllocally moderated, diffused, Radon measures of type (H) in a T1 topological space which is either weakly metacompact or paralindelöf (resp. metalindelöf) and has a concassage of Lindelöf (resp. separable) subsets....

Skeletally Dugundji spaces

Andrzej Kucharski, Szymon Plewik, Vesko Valov (2013)

Open Mathematics

We introduce and investigate the class of skeletally Dugundji spaces as a skeletal analogue of Dugundji space. Our main result states that the following conditions are equivalent for a given space X: (i) X is skeletally Dugundji; (ii) every compactification of X is co-absolute to a Dugundji space; (iii) every C*-embedding of the absolute p(X) in another space is strongly π-regular; (iv) X has a multiplicative lattice in the sense of Shchepin [Shchepin E.V., Topology of limit spaces with uncountable...

Skula spaces

Alan S. Dow, Stephen W. Watson (1990)

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

Sobre compactificaciones de Wallman-Frink de espacios discretos.

María Emilia Alonso García, José Javier Etayo Gordejuela, José Manuel Gamboa Mutuberria, Jesús María Ruiz Sancho (1980)

Revista Matemática Hispanoamericana

Dado un espacio T3α (X,T), es posible obtener una compactificación T2 del mismo, mediante ultrafiltros asociados a ciertas bases distinguidas de cerrados de (X,T) (Frink [4]). Se plantea así el problema siguiente: ¿Puede obtenerse toda compactificación T2 de (X,T) por este método? Desde el año 1964 en que Frink lo planteó, este interrogante ha tenido respuestas afirmativas parciales. Sin embargo, la solución definitiva es negativa.

Currently displaying 41 – 60 of 199