The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

Page 1

Displaying 1 – 5 of 5

Showing per page

On the existence of nonsmooth control-Lyapunov functions in the sense of generalized gradients

Ludovic Rifford (2001)

ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations

Let x ˙ = f ( x , u ) be a general control system; the existence of a smooth control-Lyapunov function does not imply the existence of a continuous stabilizing feedback. However, we show that it allows us to design a stabilizing feedback in the Krasovskii (or Filippov) sense. Moreover, we recall a definition of a control-Lyapunov function in the case of a nonsmooth function; it is based on Clarke’s generalized gradient. Finally, with an inedite proof we prove that the existence of this type of control-Lyapunov...

On the existence of nonsmooth control-Lyapunov functions in the sense of generalized gradients

Ludovic Rifford (2010)

ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations

Let x ˙ = f ( x , u ) be a general control system; the existence of a smooth control-Lyapunov function does not imply the existence of a continuous stabilizing feedback. However, we show that it allows us to design a stabilizing feedback in the Krasovskii (or Filippov) sense. Moreover, we recall a definition of a control-Lyapunov function in the case of a nonsmooth function; it is based on Clarke's generalized gradient. Finally, with an inedite proof we prove that the existence of this type of control-Lyapunov...

On the L p -stabilization of the double integrator subject to input saturation

Yacine Chitour (2001)

ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations

We consider a finite-dimensional control system ( Σ ) x ˙ ( t ) = f ( x ( t ) , u ( t ) ) , such that there exists a feedback stabilizer k that renders x ˙ = f ( x , k ( x ) ) globally asymptotically stable. Moreover, for ( H , p , q ) with H an output map and 1 p q , we assume that there exists a 𝒦 -function α such that H ( x u ) q α ( u p ) , where x u is the maximal solution of ( Σ ) k x ˙ ( t ) = f ( x ( t ) , k ( x ( t ) ) + u ( t ) ) , corresponding to u and to the initial condition x ( 0 ) = 0 . Then, the gain function G ( H , p , q ) of ( H , p , q ) given by G ( H , p , q ) ( X ) = def sup u p = X H ( x u ) q , is well-defined. We call profile of k for ( H , p , q ) any 𝒦 -function which is of the same order of magnitude as G ( H , p , q ) . For the double integrator...

On the Lp-stabilization of the double integrator subject to input saturation

Yacine Chitour (2010)

ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations

We consider a finite-dimensional control system ( Σ ) x ˙ ( t ) = f ( x ( t ) , u ( t ) ) , such that there exists a feedback stabilizer k that renders x ˙ = f ( x , k ( x ) ) globally asymptotically stable. Moreover, for (H,p,q) with H an output map and 1 p q , we assume that there exists a 𝒦 -function α such that H ( x u ) q α ( u p ) , where xu is the maximal solution of ( Σ ) k x ˙ ( t ) = f ( x ( t ) , k ( x ( t ) ) + u ( t ) ) , corresponding to u and to the initial condition x(0)=0. Then, the gain function G ( H , p , q ) of (H,p,q) given by 14.5cm G ( H , p , q ) ( X ) = def sup u p = X H ( x u ) q , is well-defined. We call profile of k for (H,p,q) any 𝒦 -function which is of the same order of...

Currently displaying 1 – 5 of 5

Page 1