In this paper, we investigate a measure of similarity of graphs similar to the Ramsey number. We present values and bounds for $g(n,l)$, the biggest number $k$ guaranteeing that there exist $l$ graphs on $n$ vertices, each two having edit distance at least $k$. By edit distance of two graphs $G$, $F$ we mean the number of edges needed to be added to or deleted from graph $G$ to obtain graph $F$. This new extremal number $g(n,l)$ is closely linked to the edit distance of graphs. Using probabilistic methods we show...

A graph is called distance integral (or $D$-integral) if all eigenvalues of its distance matrix are integers. In their study of $D$-integral complete multipartite graphs, Yang and Wang (2015) posed two questions on the existence of such graphs. We resolve these questions and present some further results on $D$-integral complete multipartite graphs. We give the first known distance integral complete multipartite graphs $K_{p_1,p_2,p_3}$ with $p_1<p_2<p_3$, and $K_{p_1,p_2,p_3,p_4}$ with $p_1<p_2<p_3<p_4$, as well as the infinite classes of distance integral...

We show that, given any n and α, any embedding of any sufficiently large complete graph in ℝ³ contains an oriented link with components Q₁, ..., Qₙ such that for every i ≠ j, $\left|lk\right(Q_i,Q_j\left)\right|\ge \alpha$ and $\left|a₂\right(Q_i\left)\right|\ge \alpha$, where $a₂\left(Q_i\right)$ denotes the second coefficient of the Conway polynomial of $Q_i$.

The distinguishing number D(G) of a graph G is the least integer d such that G has a labeling with d colors that is not preserved by any nontrivial automorphism. The restriction to proper labelings leads to the definition of the distinguishing chromatic number ${\chi }_D\left(G\right)$ of G. Extending these concepts to infinite graphs we prove that $D\left(Q_{\aleph }₀\right)=2$ and ${\chi }_D\left(Q_{\aleph }₀\right)=3$, where $Q_{\aleph }₀$ denotes the hypercube of countable dimension. We also show that ${\chi }_D\left(Q₄\right)=4$, thereby completing the investigation of finite hypercubes with respect to ${\chi }_D$. Our...

Edge-colourings of graphs have been studied for decades. We study edge-colourings with respect to hereditary graph properties. For a graph $G$, a hereditary graph property $𝒫$ and $l\ge 1$ we define ${\chi }_{𝒫,l}^{\text{'}}\left(G\right)$ to be the minimum number of colours needed to properly colour the edges of $G$, such that any subgraph of $G$ induced by edges coloured by (at most) $l$ colours is in $𝒫$. We present a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of ${\chi }_{𝒫,l}^{\text{'}}\left(G\right)$. We focus on edge-colourings of graphs with respect to the hereditary...

Suppose that $A$ is a real symmetric matrix of order $n$. Denote by $m_A\left(0\right)$ the nullity of $A$. For a nonempty subset $\alpha$ of $\{1,2,...,n\}$, let $A\left(\alpha \right)$ be the principal submatrix of $A$ obtained from $A$ by deleting the rows and columns indexed by $\alpha$. When $m_{A\left(\alpha \right)}\left(0\right)=m_A\left(0\right)+\left|\alpha \right|$, we call $\alpha$ a P-set of $A$. It is known that every P-set of $A$ contains at most $\lfloor n/2\rfloor$ elements. The graphs of even order for which one can find a matrix attaining this bound are now completely characterized. However, the odd case turned out to be more difficult to tackle. As...

For any collection of graphs $G₁,...,G_N$ we find the minimal dimension d such that the product $G₁\times ...\times G_N$ is embeddable into ${ℝ}^d$ (see Theorem 1 below). In particular, we prove that (K₅)ⁿ and $\left(K_{3,3}\right)ⁿ$ are not embeddable into ${ℝ}^{2n}$, where K₅ and $K_{3,3}$ are the Kuratowski graphs. This is a solution of a problem of Menger from 1929. The idea of the proof is a reduction to a problem from so-called Ramsey link theory: we show that any embedding $LkO\to S^{2n-1}$, where O is a vertex of (K₅)ⁿ, has a pair of linked (n-1)-spheres.

The generalized $k$-connectivity ${\kappa }_k\left(G\right)$ of a graph $G$ was introduced by Chartrand et al. in 1984. As a natural counterpart of this concept, Li et al. in 2011 introduced the concept of generalized $k$-edge-connectivity which is defined as ${\lambda }_k\left(G\right)=min\{\lambda \left(S\right):S\subseteq V\left(G\right)$ and $\left|S\right|=k\}$, where $\lambda \left(S\right)$ denotes the maximum number $\ell$ of pairwise edge-disjoint trees $T_1,T_2,...,T_{\ell }$ in $G$ such that $S\subseteq V\left(T_i\right)$ for $1\le i\le \ell$. In this paper we prove that for any two connected graphs $G$ and $H$ we have ${\lambda }_3(G\square H)\ge {\lambda }_3\left(G\right)+{\lambda }_3\left(H\right)$, where $G\square H$ is the Cartesian product of $G$ and $H$. Moreover, the bound is sharp. We also...

Let G be a graph of order n and size m. A γ-labeling of G is a one-to-one function f:V(G) → 0,1,2,...,m that induces a labeling f’: E(G) → 1,2,...,m of the edges of G defined by f’(e) = |f(u)-f(v)| for each edge e = uv of G. The value of a γ-labeling f is $val\left(f\right)={\Sigma }_{e\in E\left(G\right)}{f}^{\text{'}}K\left(e\right)$. The maximum value of a γ-labeling of G is defined as $va{l}_{max}\left(G\right)=maxval\left(f\right):fisa\gamma -labelingofG$; while the minimum value of a γ-labeling of G is $va{l}_{min}\left(G\right)=minval\left(f\right):fisa\gamma -labelingofG$; The values $va{l}_{max}\left(S_{p,q}\right)$ and $va{l}_{min}\left(S_{p,q}\right)$ are determined for double stars $S_{p,q}$. We present characterizations of connected graphs G of order n for which...

Let $G=\left(V\right(G),E(G\left)\right)$ be a simple graph and $E_G\left(v\right)$ denote the set of edges incident with a vertex $v$. A neighbor sum distinguishing (NSD) total coloring $\phi$ of $G$ is a proper total coloring of $G$ such that ${\sum }_{z\in E_G\left(u\right)\cup \left\{u\right\}}\phi \left(z\right)\ne {\sum }_{z\in E_G\left(v\right)\cup \left\{v\right\}}\phi \left(z\right)$ for each edge $uv\in E\left(G\right)$. Pilśniak and Woźniak asserted in 2015 that each graph with maximum degree $\Delta$ admits an NSD total $(\Delta +3)$-coloring. We prove that the list version of this conjecture holds for any IC-planar graph with $\Delta \ge 11$ but without $5$-cycles by applying the Combinatorial Nullstellensatz.

The Ramsey number $R(G,H)$ for a pair of graphs $G$ and $H$ is defined as the smallest integer $n$ such that, for any graph $F$ on $n$ vertices, either $F$ contains $G$ or $\overline{F}$ contains $H$ as a subgraph, where $\overline{F}$ denotes the complement of $F$. We study Ramsey numbers for some subgraphs of generalized wheels versus cycles and paths and determine these numbers for some cases. We extend many known results studied in [5, 14, 18, 19, 20]. In particular we count the numbers $R(K_1+L_n,P_m)$ and $R(K_1+L_n,C_m)$ for some integers $m$, $n$, where $L_n$ is...

Let $G$ be a simple connected graph with vertex set $V\left(G\right)=\{v_1,v_2,\cdots ,v_n\}$ and edge set $E\left(G\right)$, and let $d_{v_i}$ be the degree of the vertex $v_i$. Let $D\left(G\right)$ be the distance matrix and let $T_r\left(G\right)$ be the diagonal matrix of the vertex transmissions of $G$. The generalized distance matrix of $G$ is defined as $D_{\alpha }\left(G\right)=\alpha T_r\left(G\right)+(1-\alpha )D\left(G\right)$, where $0\le \alpha \le 1$. Let ${\lambda }_1\left(D_{\alpha }\left(G\right)\right)\ge {\lambda }_2\left(D_{\alpha }\left(G\right)\right)\ge ...\ge {\lambda }_n\left(D_{\alpha }\left(G\right)\right)$ be the generalized distance eigenvalues of $G$, and let $k$ be an integer with $1\le k\le n$. We denote by $S_k\left(D_{\alpha }\left(G\right)\right)={\lambda }_1\left(D_{\alpha }\left(G\right)\right)+{\lambda }_2\left(D_{\alpha }\left(G\right)\right)+...+{\lambda }_k\left(D_{\alpha }\left(G\right)\right)$ the sum of the $k$ largest generalized distance eigenvalues. The generalized distance spread of a graph $G$ is defined as $D_{\alpha }S\left(G\right)={\lambda }_1\left(D_{\alpha }\left(G\right)\right)-{\lambda }_n\left(D_{\alpha }\left(G\right)\right)$....

For the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) on Halin graphs with three types of cost functions: sum, bottleneck and balanced and with arbitrary real edge costs we compute in polynomial time the persistency partition $E_{All}$, $E_{Some}$, $E_{None}$ of the edge set E, where: $E_{All}$ = e ∈ E, e belongs to all optimum solutions, $E_{None}$ = e ∈ E, e does not belong to any optimum solution and $E_{Some}$ = e ∈ E, e belongs to some but not to all optimum solutions.

Let be a set of graphs and for a graph G let ${\alpha }_{}\left(G\right)$ and $\alpha {*}_{}\left(G\right)$ denote the maximum order of an induced subgraph of G which does not contain a graph in as a subgraph and which does not contain a graph in as an induced subgraph, respectively. Lower bounds on ${\alpha }_{}\left(G\right)$ and $\alpha {*}_{}\left(G\right)$ are presented.

Let $G$ be a finite group. The intersection graph ${\Delta }_G$ of $G$ is an undirected graph without loops and multiple edges defined as follows: the vertex set is the set of all proper nontrivial subgroups of $G$, and two distinct vertices $X$ and $Y$ are adjacent if $X\cap Y\ne 1$, where $1$ denotes the trivial subgroup of order $1$. A question was posed by Shen (2010) whether the diameters of intersection graphs of finite non-abelian simple groups have an upper bound. We answer the question and show that the diameters...

Let α ∈ (0,1) and let $G=(V_G,E_G$) be a graph. According to Dunbar, Hoffman, Laskar and Markus [3] a set $D\subseteq V_G$ is called an α-dominating set of G, if $|N_G\left(u\right)\cap D|\ge \alpha d_G\left(u\right)$ for all $u\in V_G\setminus D$. We prove a series of upper bounds on the α-domination number of a graph G defined as the minimum cardinality of an α-dominating set of G.

Let $ex(n,G)$ denote the maximum number of edges in a graph on $n$ vertices which does not contain $G$ as a subgraph. Let $P_i$ denote a path consisting of $i$ vertices and let $m{P}_i$ denote $m$ disjoint copies of $P_i$. In this paper we count $ex(n,3P_4)$.

Let $G_1$ and $G_2$ be two given graphs. The Ramsey number $R(G_1,G_2)$ is the least integer $r$ such that for every graph $G$ on $r$ vertices, either $G$ contains a $G_1$ or $\overline{G}$ contains a $G_2$. Parsons gave a recursive formula to determine the values of $R(P_n,K_{1,m})$, where $P_n$ is a path on $n$ vertices and $K_{1,m}$ is a star on $m+1$ vertices. In this note, we study the Ramsey numbers $R(P_n,K_1\vee F_m)$, where $F_m$ is a linear forest on $m$ vertices. We determine the exact values of $R(P_n,K_1\vee F_m)$ for the cases $m\le n$ and $m\ge 2n$, and for the case that $F_m$ has no odd component. Moreover, we...