For a fixed positive integer $k$ and $G=(V,E)$ a connected graph of order $n$, whose minimum vertex degree is at least $k$, a set $S\subseteq V$ is a total $k$-dominating set, also known as a $k$-tuple total dominating set, if every vertex $v\in V$ has at least $k$ neighbors in $S$. The minimum size of a total $k$-dominating set for $G$ is called the total $k$-domination number of $G$, denoted by ${\gamma }_{kt}\left(G\right)$. The total $k$-domination problem is to determine a minimum total $k$-dominating set of $G$. Since the exact problem is in general quite difficult...

For a graph $G=(V,E)$, a double Roman dominating function is a function $f:V\to \{0,1,2,3\}$ having the property that if $f\left(v\right)=0$, then the vertex $v$ must have at least two neighbors assigned $2$ under $f$ or one neighbor with $f\left(w\right)=3$, and if $f\left(v\right)=1$, then the vertex $v$ must have at least one neighbor with $f\left(w\right)\ge 2$. The weight of a double Roman dominating function $f$ is the sum $f\left(V\right)={\sum }_{v\in V}f\left(v\right)$. The minimum weight of a double Roman dominating function on $G$ is called the double Roman domination number of $G$ and is denoted by ${\gamma }_{\mathrm{dR}}\left(G\right)$. In this paper, we establish a new...

Let $G$ be a finite group. The main supergraph $𝒮\left(G\right)$ is a graph with vertex set $G$ in which two vertices $x$ and $y$ are adjacent if and only if $o\left(x\right)\mid o\left(y\right)$ or $o\left(y\right)\mid o\left(x\right)$. In this paper, we will show that $G{\cong }^2{G}_2\left(3^{2n+1}\right)$ if and only if $𝒮\left(G\right)\cong 𝒮{(}^2{G}_2\left(3^{2n+1}\right))$. As a main consequence of our result we conclude that Thompson’s problem is true for the small Ree group ${}^2{G}_2\left(3^{2n+1}\right)$.

Let $ex(n,G)$ denote the maximum number of edges in a graph on $n$ vertices which does not contain $G$ as a subgraph. Let $P_i$ denote a path consisting of $i$ vertices and let $m{P}_i$ denote $m$ disjoint copies of $P_i$. In this paper we count $ex(n,3P_4)$.

Let $G$ be a finite group. The main supergraph $𝒮\left(G\right)$ is a graph with vertex set $G$ in which two vertices $x$ and $y$ are adjacent if and only if $o\left(x\right)\mid o\left(y\right)$ or $o\left(y\right)\mid o\left(x\right)$. In this paper, we will show that $G\cong Sz\left(q\right)$ if and only if $𝒮\left(G\right)\cong 𝒮\left(Sz\right(q\left)\right)$, where $q=2^{2m+1}\ge 8$.

Let $G_1$ and $G_2$ be two given graphs. The Ramsey number $R(G_1,G_2)$ is the least integer $r$ such that for every graph $G$ on $r$ vertices, either $G$ contains a $G_1$ or $\overline{G}$ contains a $G_2$. Parsons gave a recursive formula to determine the values of $R(P_n,K_{1,m})$, where $P_n$ is a path on $n$ vertices and $K_{1,m}$ is a star on $m+1$ vertices. In this note, we study the Ramsey numbers $R(P_n,K_1\vee F_m)$, where $F_m$ is a linear forest on $m$ vertices. We determine the exact values of $R(P_n,K_1\vee F_m)$ for the cases $m\le n$ and $m\ge 2n$, and for the case that $F_m$ has no odd component. Moreover, we...

For a finite group $G$ denote by $N\left(G\right)$ the set of conjugacy class sizes of $G$. In 1980s, J. G. Thompson posed the following conjecture: If $L$ is a finite nonabelian simple group, $G$ is a finite group with trivial center and $N\left(G\right)=N\left(L\right)$, then $G\cong L$. We prove this conjecture for an infinite class of simple groups. Let $p$ be an odd prime. We show that every finite group $G$ with the property $Z\left(G\right)=1$ and $N\left(G\right)=N\left(A_i\right)$ is necessarily isomorphic to $A_i$, where $i\in \{2p,2p+1\}$.

Let $G$ be a simple connected graph with vertex set $V\left(G\right)=\{v_1,v_2,\cdots ,v_n\}$ and edge set $E\left(G\right)$, and let $d_{v_i}$ be the degree of the vertex $v_i$. Let $D\left(G\right)$ be the distance matrix and let $T_r\left(G\right)$ be the diagonal matrix of the vertex transmissions of $G$. The generalized distance matrix of $G$ is defined as $D_{\alpha }\left(G\right)=\alpha T_r\left(G\right)+(1-\alpha )D\left(G\right)$, where $0\le \alpha \le 1$. Let ${\lambda }_1\left(D_{\alpha }\left(G\right)\right)\ge {\lambda }_2\left(D_{\alpha }\left(G\right)\right)\ge ...\ge {\lambda }_n\left(D_{\alpha }\left(G\right)\right)$ be the generalized distance eigenvalues of $G$, and let $k$ be an integer with $1\le k\le n$. We denote by $S_k\left(D_{\alpha }\left(G\right)\right)={\lambda }_1\left(D_{\alpha }\left(G\right)\right)+{\lambda }_2\left(D_{\alpha }\left(G\right)\right)+...+{\lambda }_k\left(D_{\alpha }\left(G\right)\right)$ the sum of the $k$ largest generalized distance eigenvalues. The generalized distance spread of a graph $G$ is defined as $D_{\alpha }S\left(G\right)={\lambda }_1\left(D_{\alpha }\left(G\right)\right)-{\lambda }_n\left(D_{\alpha }\left(G\right)\right)$....

Given a graph $G=(V,E)$, if we can partition the vertex set $V$ into two nonempty subsets $V_1$ and $V_2$ which satisfy $\Delta \left(G\left[V_1\right]\right)\le d_1$ and $\Delta \left(G\left[V_2\right]\right)\le d_2$, then we say $G$ has a $({\Delta }_{d_1},{\Delta }_{d_2})$-partition. And we say $G$ admits an $(F_{d_1},F_{d_2})$-partition if $G\left[V_1\right]$ and $G\left[V_2\right]$ are both forests whose maximum degree is at most $d_1$ and $d_2$, respectively. We show that every planar graph with girth at least 5 has an $(F_4,F_4)$-partition.

The Ramsey number $R(G,H)$ for a pair of graphs $G$ and $H$ is defined as the smallest integer $n$ such that, for any graph $F$ on $n$ vertices, either $F$ contains $G$ or $\overline{F}$ contains $H$ as a subgraph, where $\overline{F}$ denotes the complement of $F$. We study Ramsey numbers for some subgraphs of generalized wheels versus cycles and paths and determine these numbers for some cases. We extend many known results studied in [5, 14, 18, 19, 20]. In particular we count the numbers $R(K_1+L_n,P_m)$ and $R(K_1+L_n,C_m)$ for some integers $m$, $n$, where $L_n$ is...

The generalized $k$-connectivity ${\kappa }_k\left(G\right)$ of a graph $G$ was introduced by Chartrand et al. in 1984. As a natural counterpart of this concept, Li et al. in 2011 introduced the concept of generalized $k$-edge-connectivity which is defined as ${\lambda }_k\left(G\right)=min\{\lambda \left(S\right):S\subseteq V\left(G\right)$ and $\left|S\right|=k\}$, where $\lambda \left(S\right)$ denotes the maximum number $\ell$ of pairwise edge-disjoint trees $T_1,T_2,...,T_{\ell }$ in $G$ such that $S\subseteq V\left(T_i\right)$ for $1\le i\le \ell$. In this paper we prove that for any two connected graphs $G$ and $H$ we have ${\lambda }_3(G\square H)\ge {\lambda }_3\left(G\right)+{\lambda }_3\left(H\right)$, where $G\square H$ is the Cartesian product of $G$ and $H$. Moreover, the bound is sharp. We also...

Let X be a Polish space, and let C₀ and C₁ be disjoint coanalytic subsets of X. The pair (C₀,C₁) is said to be complete if for every pair (D₀,D₁) of disjoint coanalytic subsets of ${\omega }^{\omega }$ there exists a continuous function $f:{\omega }^{\omega }\to X$ such that $f^{-1}\left(C₀\right)=D₀$ and $f^{-1}\left(C₁\right)=D₁$. We give several explicit examples of complete pairs of coanalytic sets.

An even factor of a graph is a spanning subgraph in which each vertex has a positive even degree. Let $G$ be a bridgeless simple graph with minimum degree at least $3$. Jackson and Yoshimoto (2007) showed that $G$ has an even factor containing two arbitrary prescribed edges. They also proved that $G$ has an even factor in which each component has order at least four. Moreover, Xiong, Lu and Han (2009) showed that for each pair of edges $e_1$ and $e_2$ of $G$, there is an even factor containing $e_1$ and $e_2$...

Let $T$ be a tree. Then a vertex of $T$ with degree one is a leaf of $T$ and a vertex of degree at least three is a branch vertex of $T$. The set of leaves of $T$ is denoted by $L\left(T\right)$ and the set of branch vertices of $T$ is denoted by $B\left(T\right)$. For two distinct vertices $u$, $v$ of $T$, let $P_T[u,v]$ denote the unique path in $T$ connecting $u$ and $v.$ Let $T$ be a tree with $B\left(T\right)\ne \varnothing$. For each leaf $x$ of $T$, let $y_x$ denote the nearest branch vertex to $x$. We delete $V\left(P_T[x,y_x]\right)\setminus \left\{y_x\right\}$ from $T$ for all $x\in L\left(T\right)$. The resulting subtree of $T$ is called the reducible stem...