The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

Previous Page 3

Displaying 41 – 52 of 52

Showing per page

Products of topological spaces and families of filters

Paolo Lipparini (2023)

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

We show that, under suitably general formulations, covering properties, accumulation properties and filter convergence are all equivalent notions. This general correspondence is exemplified in the study of products. We prove that a product is Lindelöf if and only if all subproducts by ω 1 factors are Lindelöf. Parallel results are obtained for final ω n -compactness, [ λ , μ ] -compactness, the Menger and the Rothberger properties.

Property of being semi-Kelley for the cartesian products and hyperspaces

Enrique Castañeda-Alvarado, Ivon Vidal-Escobar (2017)

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

In this paper we construct a Kelley continuum X such that X × [ 0 , 1 ] is not semi-Kelley, this answers a question posed by J.J. Charatonik and W.J. Charatonik in A weaker form of the property of Kelley, Topology Proc. 23 (1998), 69–99. In addition, we show that the hyperspace C ( X ) is not semi- Kelley. Further we show that small Whitney levels in C ( X ) are not semi-Kelley, answering a question posed by A. Illanes in Problemas propuestos para el taller de Teoría de continuos y sus hiperespacios, Queretaro, 2013.

Pseudo-homotopies of the pseudo-arc

Alejandro Illanes (2012)

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

Let X be a continuum. Two maps g , h : X X are said to be pseudo-homotopic provided that there exist a continuum C , points s , t C and a continuous function H : X × C X such that for each x X , H ( x , s ) = g ( x ) and H ( x , t ) = h ( x ) . In this paper we prove that if P is the pseudo-arc, g is one-to-one and h is pseudo-homotopic to g , then g = h . This theorem generalizes previous results by W. Lewis and M. Sobolewski.

Pseudoradial Spaces: Finite Products and an Example From CH

Simon, Petr, Tironi, Gino (1998)

Serdica Mathematical Journal

∗ The first named author’s research was partially supported by GAUK grant no. 350, partially by the Italian CNR. Both supports are gratefully acknowledged. The second author was supported by funds of Italian Ministery of University and by funds of the University of Trieste (40% and 60%).Aiming to solve some open problems concerning pseudoradial spaces, we shall present the following: Assuming CH, there are two semiradial spaces without semi-radial product. A new property of pseudoradial spaces...

Currently displaying 41 – 52 of 52

Previous Page 3