Page 1 Next

Displaying 1 – 20 of 100

Showing per page

Each nowhere dense nonvoid closed set in Rn is a σ-limit set

Andrei Sivak (1996)

Fundamenta Mathematicae

We discuss main properties of the dynamics on minimal attraction centers (σ-limit sets) of single trajectories for continuous maps of a compact metric space into itself. We prove that each nowhere dense nonvoid closed set in n , n ≥ 1, is a σ-limit set for some continuous map.

Egoroff, σ, and convergence properties in some archimedean vector lattices

A. W. Hager, J. van Mill (2015)

Studia Mathematica

An archimedean vector lattice A might have the following properties: (1) the sigma property (σ): For each a n c o n A there are λ n ( 0 , ) and a ∈ A with λₙaₙ ≤ a for each n; (2) order convergence and relative uniform convergence are equivalent, denoted (OC ⇒ RUC): if aₙ ↓ 0 then aₙ → 0 r.u. The conjunction of these two is called strongly Egoroff. We consider vector lattices of the form D(X) (all extended real continuous functions on the compact space X) showing that (σ) and (OC ⇒ RUC) are equivalent, and equivalent...

Ellis groups of quasi-factors of minimal flows

Joseph Auslander (2000)

Colloquium Mathematicae

A quasi-factor of a minimal flow is a minimal subset of the induced flow on the space of closed subsets. We study a particular kind of quasi-factor (a 'joining' quasi-factor) using the Galois theory of minimal flows. We also investigate the relation between factors and quasi-factors.

Embedding a topological group into a connected group

Ryo Ohashi (2007)

Colloquium Mathematicae

It was proved in [HM] that each topological group (G,·,τ) may be embedded into a connected topological group (Ĝ,•,τ̂). In fact, two methods of introducing τ̂ were given. In this note we show relations between them.

Embedding inverse limits of nearly Markov interval maps as attracting sets of planar diffeomorphisms

Sarah Holte (1995)

Colloquium Mathematicae

In this paper we address the following question due to Marcy Barge: For what f:I → I is it the case that the inverse limit of I with single bonding map f can be embedded in the plane so that the shift homeomorphism f ^ extends to a diffeomorphism ([BB, Problem 1.5], [BK, Problem 3])? This question could also be phrased as follows: Given a map f:I → I, find a diffeomorphism F : 2 2 so that F restricted to its full attracting set, k 0 F k ( 2 ) , is topologically conjugate to f ^ : ( I , f ) ( I , f ) . In this situation, we say that the inverse...

Currently displaying 1 – 20 of 100

Page 1 Next