If the minimum problem (${𝒫}_{\mathrm{\infty }}$) is the limit, in a variational sense, of a sequence of minimum problems with obstacles of the type $$\underset{u\ge {\varphi }_h}{\min }{\int }_{\mathrm{\Omega }}\left[f_h(x,Du)+a(x,u)\right]dx,$$ then (${𝒫}_{\mathrm{\infty }}$) can be written in the form $${𝒫}_{\infty }\underset{u}{min}\left\{{\int }_{\Omega }\left[f_{\infty }(x,Du)+a(x,u)\right]dx+{\int }_{\overline{\Omega }}{g}_{\infty }(x,\overline{u}\left(x\right))d{\mu }_{\infty }\left(x\right)\right\}$$ without any additional constraint.

Se il problema di minimo $({𝒫}_{\mathrm{\infty }})$ è il limite, in senso variazionale, di una successione di problemi di minimo con ostacoli del tipo $$\underset{u\ge {\psi }_h}{\min }{\int }_A\left[f_h(x,u,Du)+b(x,u)\right]dx,$$ allora $({𝒫}_{\mathrm{\infty }})$ può essere scritto nella forma $$\underset{u}{\min }\left\{{\int }_A\left[f_{\mathrm{\infty }}(x,u,Du)+b(x,u)\right]dx+{\int }_A{g}_{\mathrm{\infty }}(x,\tilde{u}(x))d{\lambda }_{\mathrm{\infty }}(x)\right\}$$ dove $\tilde{u}$ è un conveniente rappresentante di $u$ e ${\lambda }_{\mathrm{\infty }}$ è una misura non negativa.

Arhangel’skii proved that if a first countable Hausdorff space is Lindelöf, then its cardinality is at most $2^{\aleph ₀}$. Such a clean upper bound for Lindelöf spaces in the larger class of spaces whose points are $G_{\delta }$ has been more elusive. In this paper we continue the agenda started by the second author, [Topology Appl. 63 (1995)], of considering the cardinality problem for spaces satisfying stronger versions of the Lindelöf property. Infinite games and selection principles, especially the Rothberger property,...

We give an example of a compact space X whose iterated continuous function spaces $C_p\left(X\right)$, $C_p{C}_p\left(X\right),...$ are Lindelöf, but X is not a Corson compactum. This solves a problem of Gul’ko (Problem 1052 in [11]). We also provide a theorem concerning the Lindelöf property in the function spaces $C_p\left(X\right)$ on compact scattered spaces with the ${\omega }_1$th derived set empty, improving some earlier results of Pol [12] in this direction.