Displaying 81 – 100 of 105

Showing per page

Almost Butler groups

Ladislav Bican (2000)

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal

Generalizing the notion of the almost free group we introduce almost Butler groups. An almost B 2 -group G of singular cardinality is a B 2 -group. Since almost B 2 -groups have preseparative chains, the same result in regular cardinality holds under the additional hypothesis that G is a B 1 -group. Some other results characterizing B 2 -groups within the classes of almost B 1 -groups and almost B 2 -groups are obtained. A theorem of stating that a group G of weakly compact cardinality λ having a λ -filtration consisting...

Almost coproducts of finite cyclic groups

Paul Hill (1995)

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

A new class of p -primary abelian groups that are Hausdorff in the p -adic topology and that generalize direct sums of cyclic groups are studied. We call this new class of groups almost coproducts of cyclic groups. These groups are defined in terms of a modified axiom 3 system, and it is observed that such groups appear naturally. For example, V ( G ) / G is almost a coproduct of finite cyclic groups whenever G is a Hausdorff p -primary group and V ( G ) is the group of normalized units of the modular group algebra...

Almost free splitters

Rüdiger Göbel, Saharon Shelah (1999)

Colloquium Mathematicae

Let R be a subring of the rationals. We want to investigate self splitting R-modules G, that is, such that E x t R ( G , G ) = 0 . For simplicity we will call such modules splitters (see [10]). Also other names like stones are used (see a dictionary in Ringel’s paper [8]). Our investigation continues [5]. In [5] we answered an open problem by constructing a large class of splitters. Classical splitters are free modules and torsion-free, algebraically compact ones. In [5] we concentrated on splitters which are larger...

Almost-flat modules

Simion Breaz (2003)

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal

We present general properties for almost-flat modules and we prove that a self-small right module is almost flat as a left module over its endomorphism ring if and only if the class of g -static modules is closed under the kernels.

Almost-free E(R)-algebras and E(A,R)-modules

Rüdiger Göbel, Lutz Strüngmann (2001)

Fundamenta Mathematicae

Let R be a unital commutative ring and A a unital R-algebra. We introduce the category of E(A,R)-modules which is a natural extension of the category of E-modules. The properties of E(A,R)-modules are studied; in particular we consider the subclass of E(R)-algebras. This subclass is of special interest since it coincides with the class of E-rings in the case R = ℤ. Assuming diamond ⋄, almost-free E(R)-algebras of cardinality κ are constructed for any regular non-weakly compact cardinal κ > ℵ...

An addendum and corrigendum to "Almost free splitters" (Colloq. Math. 81 (1999), 193-221)

Rüdiger Göbel, Saharon Shelah (2001)

Colloquium Mathematicae

Let R be a subring of the rational numbers ℚ. We recall from [3] that an R-module G is a splitter if E x t ¹ R ( G , G ) = 0 . In this note we correct the statement of Main Theorem 1.5 in [3] and discuss the existence of non-free splitters of cardinality ℵ₁ under the negation of the special continuum hypothesis CH.

An extension of Zassenhaus' theorem on endomorphism rings

Manfred Dugas, Rüdiger Göbel (2007)

Fundamenta Mathematicae

Let R be a ring with identity such that R⁺, the additive group of R, is torsion-free. If there is some R-module M such that R M R ( = R ) and E n d ( M ) = R , we call R a Zassenhaus ring. Hans Zassenhaus showed in 1967 that whenever R⁺ is free of finite rank, then R is a Zassenhaus ring. We will show that if R⁺ is free of countable rank and each element of R is algebraic over ℚ, then R is a Zassenhaus ring. We will give an example showing that this restriction on R is needed. Moreover, we will show that a ring due to A....

A-Rings

Manfred Dugas, Shalom Feigelstock (2003)

Colloquium Mathematicae

A ring R is called an E-ring if every endomorphism of R⁺, the additive group of R, is multiplication on the left by an element of R. This is a well known notion in the theory of abelian groups. We want to change the "E" as in endomorphisms to an "A" as in automorphisms: We define a ring to be an A-ring if every automorphism of R⁺ is multiplication on the left by some element of R. We show that many torsion-free finite rank (tffr) A-rings are actually E-rings. While we have an example of a mixed...

Currently displaying 81 – 100 of 105