Previous Page 3

Displaying 41 – 54 of 54

Showing per page

Monotonically normal e -separable spaces may not be perfect

John E. Porter (2018)

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

A topological space X is said to be e -separable if X has a σ -closed-discrete dense subset. Recently, G. Gruenhage and D. Lutzer showed that e -separable PIGO spaces are perfect and asked if e -separable monotonically normal spaces are perfect in general. The main purpose of this article is to provide examples of e -separable monotonically normal spaces which are not perfect. Extremely normal e -separable spaces are shown to be stratifiable.

More about spaces with a small diagonal

Alan Dow, Oleg Pavlov (2006)

Fundamenta Mathematicae

Hušek defines a space X to have a small diagonal if each uncountable subset of X² disjoint from the diagonal has an uncountable subset whose closure is disjoint from the diagonal. Hušek proved that a compact space of weight ω₁ which has a small diagonal will be metrizable, but it remains an open problem to determine if the weight restriction is necessary. It has been shown to be consistent that each compact space with a small diagonal is metrizable; in particular, Juhász and Szentmiklóssy proved...

More on strongly sequential spaces

Frédéric Mynard (2002)

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

Strongly sequential spaces were introduced and studied to solve a problem of Tanaka concerning the product of sequential topologies. In this paper, further properties of strongly sequential spaces are investigated.

More on the product of pseudo radial spaces

Angelo Bella (1991)

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

It is proved that the product of two pseudo radial compact spaces is pseudo radial provided that one of them is monolithic.

More on tie-points and homeomorphism in ℕ*

Alan Dow, Saharon Shelah (2009)

Fundamenta Mathematicae

A point x is a (bow) tie-point of a space X if X∖x can be partitioned into (relatively) clopen sets each with x in its closure. We denote this as X = A x B where A, B are the closed sets which have a unique common accumulation point x. Tie-points have appeared in the construction of non-trivial autohomeomorphisms of βℕ = ℕ* (by Veličković and Shelah Steprans) and in the recent study (by Levy and Dow Techanie) of precisely 2-to-1 maps on ℕ*. In these cases the tie-points have been the unique fixed point...

More on κ -Ohio completeness

D. Basile (2011)

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

We study closed subspaces of κ -Ohio complete spaces and, for κ uncountable cardinal, we prove a characterization for them. We then investigate the behaviour of products of κ -Ohio complete spaces. We prove that, if the cardinal κ + is endowed with either the order or the discrete topology, the space ( κ + ) κ + is not κ -Ohio complete. As a consequence, we show that, if κ is less than the first weakly inaccessible cardinal, then neither the space ω κ + , nor the space κ + is κ -Ohio complete.

More reflections on compactness

Lúcia R. Junqueira, Franklin D. Tall (2003)

Fundamenta Mathematicae

We consider the question of when X M = X , where X M is the elementary submodel topology on X ∩ M, especially in the case when X M is compact.

More than a 0-point

Jana Flašková (2006)

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

We construct in ZFC an ultrafilter U * such that for every one-to-one function f : there exists U U with f [ U ] in the summable ideal, i.e. the sum of reciprocals of its elements converges. This strengthens Gryzlov’s result concerning the existence of 0 -points.

Currently displaying 41 – 54 of 54

Previous Page 3