The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

Page 1

Displaying 1 – 12 of 12

Showing per page

L estimates of solution for m -Laplacian parabolic equation with a nonlocal term

Pulun Hou, Caisheng Chen (2011)

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal

In this paper, we consider the global existence, uniqueness and L estimates of weak solutions to quasilinear parabolic equation of m -Laplacian type u t - div ( | u | m - 2 u ) = u | u | β - 1 Ω | u | α d x in Ω × ( 0 , ) with zero Dirichlet boundary condition in Ω . Further, we obtain the L estimate of the solution u ( t ) and u ( t ) for t > 0 with the initial data u 0 L q ( Ω ) ( q > ...

Lipschitz stability in the determination of the principal part of a parabolic equation

Ganghua Yuan, Masahiro Yamamoto (2009)

ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations

Let y ( h ) ( t , x ) be one solution to t y ( t , x ) - i , j = 1 n j ( a i j ( x ) i y ( t , x ) ) = h ( t , x ) , 0 < t < T , x Ω with a non-homogeneous term h , and y | ( 0 , T ) × Ω = 0 , where Ω n is a bounded domain. We discuss an inverse problem of determining n ( n + 1 ) / 2 unknown functions a i j by { ν y ( h ) | ( 0 , T ) × Γ 0 , y ( h ) ( θ , · ) } 1 0 after selecting input sources h 1 , . . . , h 0 suitably, where Γ 0 is an arbitrary subboundary, ν denotes the normal derivative, 0 < θ < T and 0 . In the case of 0 = ( n + 1 ) 2 n / 2 , we prove the Lipschitz stability in the inverse problem if we choose ( h 1 , . . . , h 0 ) from a set { C 0 ( ( 0 , T ) × ω ) } 0 with an arbitrarily fixed subdomain ω Ω . Moreover we can take 0 = ( n + 3 ) n / 2 by making special choices for h , 1 0 . The proof is...

Lipschitz stability in the determination of the principal part of a parabolic equation

Ganghua Yuan, Masahiro Yamamoto (2008)

ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations

Let y(h)(t,x) be one solution to t y ( t , x ) - i , j = 1 n j ( a i j ( x ) i y ( t , x ) ) = h ( t , x ) , 0 < t < T , x Ω with a non-homogeneous term h, and y | ( 0 , T ) × Ω = 0 , where Ω n is a bounded domain. We discuss an inverse problem of determining n(n+1)/2 unknown functions aij by { ν y ( h ) | ( 0 , T ) × Γ 0 , y ( h ) ( θ , · ) } 1 0 after selecting input sources h 1 , . . . , h 0 suitably, where Γ 0 is an arbitrary subboundary, ν denotes the normal derivative, 0 < θ < T and 0 . In the case of 0 = ( n + 1 ) 2 n / 2 , we prove the Lipschitz stability in the inverse problem if we choose ( h 1 , . . . , h 0 ) from a set { C 0 ( ( 0 , T ) × ω ) } 0 with an arbitrarily fixed subdomain ω Ω . Moreover we can take 0 = ( n + 3 ) n / 2 by making special choices for...

L∞(L2) and L∞(L∞) error estimates for mixed methods for integro-differential equations of parabolic type

Ziwen Jiang (2010)

ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis

Error estimates in L∞(0,T;L2(Ω)), L∞(0,T;L2(Ω)2), L∞(0,T;L∞(Ω)), L∞(0,T;L∞(Ω)2), Ω in 2 , are derived for a mixed finite element method for the initial-boundary value problem for integro-differential equation u t = div { a u + 0 t b 1 u d τ + 0 t 𝐜 u d τ } + f based on the Raviart-Thomas space Vh x Wh ⊂ H(div;Ω) x L2(Ω). Optimal order estimates are obtained for the approximation of u,ut in L∞(0,T;L2(Ω)) and the associated velocity p in L∞(0,T;L2(Ω)2), divp in L∞(0,T;L2(Ω)). Quasi-optimal order estimates are obtained for the approximation...

Currently displaying 1 – 12 of 12

Page 1