Displaying 41 – 60 of 69

Showing per page

Construction of functions with prescribed Hölder and chirp exponents.

Stéphane Jaffard (2000)

Revista Matemática Iberoamericana

We show that the Hölder exponent and the chirp exponent of a function can be prescribed simultaneously on a set of full measure, if they are both lower limits of continuous functions. We also show that this result is optimal: In general, Hölder and chirp exponents cannot be prescribed outside a set of Hausdorff dimension less than one. The direct part of the proof consists in an explicit construction of a function determined by its orthonormal wavelet coefficients; the optimality is the direct consequence...

Construction of Non-MSF Non-MRA Wavelets for L²(ℝ) and H²(ℝ) from MSF Wavelets

Aparna Vyas (2009)

Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences. Mathematics

Considering symmetric wavelet sets consisting of four intervals, a class of non-MSF non-MRA wavelets for L²(ℝ) and dilation 2 is obtained. In addition, we obtain a family of non-MSF non-MRA H²-wavelets which includes the one given by Behera [Bull. Polish Acad. Sci. Math. 52 (2004), 169-178].

Continuous wavelet transform on semisimple Lie groups and inversion of the Abel transform and its dual.

K. Trimèche (1996)

Collectanea Mathematica

In this work we define and study wavelets and continuous wavelet transform on semisimple Lie groups G of real rank l. We prove for this transform Plancherel and inversion formulas. Next using the Abel transform A on G and its dual A*, we give relations between the continuous wavelet transform on G and the classical continuous wavelet transform on Rl, and we deduce the formulas which give the inverse operators of the operators A and A*.

Control Norms for Large Control Times

Sergei Ivanov (2010)

ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations

A control system of the second order in time with control u = u ( t ) L 2 ( [ 0 , T ] ; U ) is considered. If the system is controllable in a strong sense and uT is the control steering the system to the rest at time T, then the L2–norm of uT decreases as 1 / T while the L 1 ( [ 0 , T ] ; U ) –norm of uT is approximately constant. The proof is based on the moment approach and properties of the relevant exponential family. Results are applied to the wave equation with boundary or distributed controls.

Currently displaying 41 – 60 of 69