Les modalités de la correction totale
Nous présentons dans ce papier une définition purement syntaxique des types entrées et des types sorties du système . Nous définissons les types de données syntaxiques comme étant des types entrées et sorties. Nous démontrons que les types à quantificateurs positifs sont des types de données syntaxiques et qu’un type entrée est un type sortie. Nous imposons des restrictions sur la règle d’élimination des quantificateurs pour démontrer qu’un type sortie est un type entrée.
We give in this paper a purely syntactical definition of input and output types of system . We define the syntactical data types as input and output types. We show that any type with positive quantifiers is a syntactical data type and that an input type is an output type. We give some restrictions on the ∀-elimination rule in order to prove that an output type is an input type.
In his paper [Kybernetika 31, No. 1, 99–106 (1995; Zbl 0857.03042)], E. Turunen says in the corollary on p. 106: “Notice that the third last line on page 195 in [J. K. Mattila, “Modifier logic”, in: J. Kacprzyk (ed.) et al., Fuzzy logic for the management of uncertainty. New York: Wiley. 191–209 (1992)] stating that LPC+Ch calculus is consistent is not correct.” The system LPC+Ch is consistent, which can be seen quite trivially.
We introduce various kinds of fixed-point properties for modal logics, and we classify the most prominent systems according to these. Our goal is to do a first step towards a complete characterization of provability logics of (possibly non standard) derivability predicates for Peano Arithmetic.
In this paper we present logics about stable and unstable versions of several well-known relations from mereology: part-of, overlap and underlap. An intuitive semantics is given for the stable and unstable relations, describing them as dynamic counterparts of the base mereological relations. Stable relations are described as ones that always hold, while unstable relations hold sometimes. A set of first-order sentences is provided to serve as axioms for the stable and unstable relations, and representation...
The Author describes new systems of logic (called "nonalethic") which are both paraconsistent and paracomplete. These systems are connected with the logic of vagueness and with certain philosophical problems (e.g. with some aspects of Hegel's logic).
Continuing the study of different types of Abstract Logics [5], and following works by Brown-Bloom [1] and Brown-Suszko [2], we analyze in this paper some logics in which, if we identify equivalent formulae by means of the consequence operator, we obtain distributive lattices or Boolean algebras.